Court : Karnataka
..... 9, pre- amendment enabled the special court to try the offences of land grabbing or the determination of question of title and ownership to, or lawful possession of any land grabbed under the act and offences specified in chapter xiva of karnataka land revenue act and its decision thereof was ..... (2004) 1 sc cases597 collector of central ..... . yet another argument which has been canvassed is that unguided power would result in misuse or abuse of the provisions of the act and as such, it would be vice of arbitrariness and hit by article 14 of the constitution of india and as such, sub-section (1) of section 9 is liable to be quashed is an attractive argument to be brushed aside, inasmuch as, the said issue being no more res integra in the light of law laid down ..... . it is contended that land grabber is one who commits or committed the offence land grabbing 348 prior to act and section 9(1) and section 2(e) makes the offence under section 4(1) retrospective operation and article 21 of the constitution of india prohibits any person to be convicted of any offence if the same is not in violation of a law which was not ..... evolved by the supreme court of the united states of america in the application of the fourteenth amendment were eschewed in our constitution and instead the limits of restrictions on each fundamental right were indicated in the clauses that follow the first clause of the nineteenth article, it cannot be said as an absolute principle that no law will be considered bad .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... 9, pre- amendment enabled the special court to try the offences of land grabbing or the determination of question of title and ownership to, or lawful possession of any land grabbed under the act and offences specified in chapter xiva of karnataka land revenue act and its decision thereof was ..... (2004) 1 sc cases597 collector of central ..... . yet another argument which has been canvassed is that unguided power would result in misuse or abuse of the provisions of the act and as such, it would be vice of arbitrariness and hit by article 14 of the constitution of india and as such, sub-section (1) of section 9 is liable to be quashed is an attractive argument to be brushed aside, inasmuch as, the said issue being no more res integra in the light of law laid down ..... . it is contended that land grabber is one who commits or committed the offence land grabbing 348 prior to act and section 9(1) and section 2(e) makes the offence under section 4(1) retrospective operation and article 21 of the constitution of india prohibits any person to be convicted of any offence if the same is not in violation of a law which was not ..... evolved by the supreme court of the united states of america in the application of the fourteenth amendment were eschewed in our constitution and instead the limits of restrictions on each fundamental right were indicated in the clauses that follow the first clause of the nineteenth article, it cannot be said as an absolute principle that no law will be considered bad .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... 9, pre- amendment enabled the special court to try the offences of land grabbing or the determination of question of title and ownership to, or lawful possession of any land grabbed under the act and offences specified in chapter xiva of karnataka land revenue act and its decision thereof was ..... (2004) 1 sc cases597 collector of central ..... . yet another argument which has been canvassed is that unguided power would result in misuse or abuse of the provisions of the act and as such, it would be vice of arbitrariness and hit by article 14 of the constitution of india and as such, sub-section (1) of section 9 is liable to be quashed is an attractive argument to be brushed aside, inasmuch as, the said issue being no more res integra in the light of law laid down ..... . it is contended that land grabber is one who commits or committed the offence land grabbing 348 prior to act and section 9(1) and section 2(e) makes the offence under section 4(1) retrospective operation and article 21 of the constitution of india prohibits any person to be convicted of any offence if the same is not in violation of a law which was not ..... evolved by the supreme court of the united states of america in the application of the fourteenth amendment were eschewed in our constitution and instead the limits of restrictions on each fundamental right were indicated in the clauses that follow the first clause of the nineteenth article, it cannot be said as an absolute principle that no law will be considered bad .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... 9, pre- amendment enabled the special court to try the offences of land grabbing or the determination of question of title and ownership to, or lawful possession of any land grabbed under the act and offences specified in chapter xiva of karnataka land revenue act and its decision thereof was ..... (2004) 1 sc cases597 collector of central ..... . yet another argument which has been canvassed is that unguided power would result in misuse or abuse of the provisions of the act and as such, it would be vice of arbitrariness and hit by article 14 of the constitution of india and as such, sub-section (1) of section 9 is liable to be quashed is an attractive argument to be brushed aside, inasmuch as, the said issue being no more res integra in the light of law laid down ..... . it is contended that land grabber is one who commits or committed the offence land grabbing 348 prior to act and section 9(1) and section 2(e) makes the offence under section 4(1) retrospective operation and article 21 of the constitution of india prohibits any person to be convicted of any offence if the same is not in violation of a law which was not ..... evolved by the supreme court of the united states of america in the application of the fourteenth amendment were eschewed in our constitution and instead the limits of restrictions on each fundamental right were indicated in the clauses that follow the first clause of the nineteenth article, it cannot be said as an absolute principle that no law will be considered bad .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... 9, pre- amendment enabled the special court to try the offences of land grabbing or the determination of question of title and ownership to, or lawful possession of any land grabbed under the act and offences specified in chapter xiva of karnataka land revenue act and its decision thereof was ..... (2004) 1 sc cases597 collector of central ..... . yet another argument which has been canvassed is that unguided power would result in misuse or abuse of the provisions of the act and as such, it would be vice of arbitrariness and hit by article 14 of the constitution of india and as such, sub-section (1) of section 9 is liable to be quashed is an attractive argument to be brushed aside, inasmuch as, the said issue being no more res integra in the light of law laid down ..... . it is contended that land grabber is one who commits or committed the offence land grabbing 348 prior to act and section 9(1) and section 2(e) makes the offence under section 4(1) retrospective operation and article 21 of the constitution of india prohibits any person to be convicted of any offence if the same is not in violation of a law which was not ..... evolved by the supreme court of the united states of america in the application of the fourteenth amendment were eschewed in our constitution and instead the limits of restrictions on each fundamental right were indicated in the clauses that follow the first clause of the nineteenth article, it cannot be said as an absolute principle that no law will be considered bad .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... 9, pre- amendment enabled the special court to try the offences of land grabbing or the determination of question of title and ownership to, or lawful possession of any land grabbed under the act and offences specified in chapter xiva of karnataka land revenue act and its decision thereof was ..... (2004) 1 sc cases597 collector of central ..... . yet another argument which has been canvassed is that unguided power would result in misuse or abuse of the provisions of the act and as such, it would be vice of arbitrariness and hit by article 14 of the constitution of india and as such, sub-section (1) of section 9 is liable to be quashed is an attractive argument to be brushed aside, inasmuch as, the said issue being no more res integra in the light of law laid down ..... . it is contended that land grabber is one who commits or committed the offence land grabbing 348 prior to act and section 9(1) and section 2(e) makes the offence under section 4(1) retrospective operation and article 21 of the constitution of india prohibits any person to be convicted of any offence if the same is not in violation of a law which was not ..... evolved by the supreme court of the united states of america in the application of the fourteenth amendment were eschewed in our constitution and instead the limits of restrictions on each fundamental right were indicated in the clauses that follow the first clause of the nineteenth article, it cannot be said as an absolute principle that no law will be considered bad .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... 9, pre- amendment enabled the special court to try the offences of land grabbing or the determination of question of title and ownership to, or lawful possession of any land grabbed under the act and offences specified in chapter xiva of karnataka land revenue act and its decision thereof was ..... (2004) 1 sc cases597 collector of central ..... . yet another argument which has been canvassed is that unguided power would result in misuse or abuse of the provisions of the act and as such, it would be vice of arbitrariness and hit by article 14 of the constitution of india and as such, sub-section (1) of section 9 is liable to be quashed is an attractive argument to be brushed aside, inasmuch as, the said issue being no more res integra in the light of law laid down ..... . it is contended that land grabber is one who commits or committed the offence land grabbing 348 prior to act and section 9(1) and section 2(e) makes the offence under section 4(1) retrospective operation and article 21 of the constitution of india prohibits any person to be convicted of any offence if the same is not in violation of a law which was not ..... evolved by the supreme court of the united states of america in the application of the fourteenth amendment were eschewed in our constitution and instead the limits of restrictions on each fundamental right were indicated in the clauses that follow the first clause of the nineteenth article, it cannot be said as an absolute principle that no law will be considered bad .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... 9, pre- amendment enabled the special court to try the offences of land grabbing or the determination of question of title and ownership to, or lawful possession of any land grabbed under the act and offences specified in chapter xiva of karnataka land revenue act and its decision thereof was ..... (2004) 1 sc cases597 collector of central ..... . yet another argument which has been canvassed is that unguided power would result in misuse or abuse of the provisions of the act and as such, it would be vice of arbitrariness and hit by article 14 of the constitution of india and as such, sub-section (1) of section 9 is liable to be quashed is an attractive argument to be brushed aside, inasmuch as, the said issue being no more res integra in the light of law laid down ..... . it is contended that land grabber is one who commits or committed the offence land grabbing 348 prior to act and section 9(1) and section 2(e) makes the offence under section 4(1) retrospective operation and article 21 of the constitution of india prohibits any person to be convicted of any offence if the same is not in violation of a law which was not ..... evolved by the supreme court of the united states of america in the application of the fourteenth amendment were eschewed in our constitution and instead the limits of restrictions on each fundamental right were indicated in the clauses that follow the first clause of the nineteenth article, it cannot be said as an absolute principle that no law will be considered bad .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... 9, pre- amendment enabled the special court to try the offences of land grabbing or the determination of question of title and ownership to, or lawful possession of any land grabbed under the act and offences specified in chapter xiva of karnataka land revenue act and its decision thereof was ..... (2004) 1 sc cases597 collector of central ..... . yet another argument which has been canvassed is that unguided power would result in misuse or abuse of the provisions of the act and as such, it would be vice of arbitrariness and hit by article 14 of the constitution of india and as such, sub-section (1) of section 9 is liable to be quashed is an attractive argument to be brushed aside, inasmuch as, the said issue being no more res integra in the light of law laid down ..... . it is contended that land grabber is one who commits or committed the offence land grabbing 348 prior to act and section 9(1) and section 2(e) makes the offence under section 4(1) retrospective operation and article 21 of the constitution of india prohibits any person to be convicted of any offence if the same is not in violation of a law which was not ..... evolved by the supreme court of the united states of america in the application of the fourteenth amendment were eschewed in our constitution and instead the limits of restrictions on each fundamental right were indicated in the clauses that follow the first clause of the nineteenth article, it cannot be said as an absolute principle that no law will be considered bad .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... 9, pre- amendment enabled the special court to try the offences of land grabbing or the determination of question of title and ownership to, or lawful possession of any land grabbed under the act and offences specified in chapter xiva of karnataka land revenue act and its decision thereof was ..... (2004) 1 sc cases597 collector of central ..... . yet another argument which has been canvassed is that unguided power would result in misuse or abuse of the provisions of the act and as such, it would be vice of arbitrariness and hit by article 14 of the constitution of india and as such, sub-section (1) of section 9 is liable to be quashed is an attractive argument to be brushed aside, inasmuch as, the said issue being no more res integra in the light of law laid down ..... . it is contended that land grabber is one who commits or committed the offence land grabbing 348 prior to act and section 9(1) and section 2(e) makes the offence under section 4(1) retrospective operation and article 21 of the constitution of india prohibits any person to be convicted of any offence if the same is not in violation of a law which was not ..... evolved by the supreme court of the united states of america in the application of the fourteenth amendment were eschewed in our constitution and instead the limits of restrictions on each fundamental right were indicated in the clauses that follow the first clause of the nineteenth article, it cannot be said as an absolute principle that no law will be considered bad .....
Tag this Judgment!