Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: central excise tariff amendment act 2004 chapter lxv headgear and parts thereof Court: delhi Page 1 of about 6 results (0.305 seconds)

Jul 02 2009 (HC)

Naz Foundation Vs. Government of Nct and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2010CriLJ94; 160(2009)DLT277

..... , inter alia, recommended the following:respect, protect and fulfill the rights of men who have sex with men and address stigma and discrimination in society and in the workplace by amending laws prohibiting sexual acts between consenting adults in private; enforcing anti-discrimination; providing legal aid services, and promoting campaigns that address homophobia. ..... in anuj garg, constitutional validity of section 30 of the punjab excise act, 1914 prohibiting employment of 'any man under the age of 25 years' or 'any woman' in any part of such premises in which liquor or intoxicating drug is consumed by the public was challenged before the ..... that the impugned provision is necessary since the deletion thereof would well open flood gates of delinquent behaviour and can possibly be misconstrued as providing unfettered licence for homosexuality ..... the constitution demands for the autonomy of the person in making these choices, the court stated as follows:these matters, involving the most intimate and personal choices a person may make in a lifetime, choices central to personal dignity and autonomy, are central to the liberty protected by the fourteenth amendment. ..... this chapter section 377 ipc is categorised under the sub-chapter titled 'of unnatural offences' and reads ..... the writ petition was dismissed by this court in 2004 on the ground that there is no cause of action in favour of the petitioner and that such a petition cannot be entertained to examine the academic challenge to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 04 2019 (HC)

Aarshiya Gulati (Minor) Thr. Next Friend & Ors vs.kuldeep Singh Gulati ...

Court : Delhi

..... it cs (os) 2223/2013 page 32 of 49 only deals with the interpretation and effect of the hindu succession (amendment) act, 2005 to section 6 with regard to female coparcenors. ..... is separately acquired has been deliberately and voluntarily thrown by the owner into the joint stock with the clear intention of abandoning his claim on the said property and with the object of assimilating it to the joint family property, then the said property becomes a part of the joint family estate; in other words, the separate property of a coparcener loses its separate character by reason of the owner's conduct and get thrown into the common stock ..... the identity of the properties which were the subject-matter of the earlier suit vis- -vis the properties which were subsequently acquired and the effect thereof is beyond the purview of order 7 rule 11(d) of the code.38. ..... surjit singh and others, plr (2004) cs (os) 2223/2013 page 43 of 49 138 p&h469 and matu ram (deceased) thru lrs vs. ..... the textual authority of the mitakshara lays down in express terms that the joint family property is held in trust for the joint family members then living and thereafter to be born (see mitakshara, chapter i, pp. 1-27). ..... he also referred to the central govt. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 03 2018 (HC)

r.s. Dahiya vs.state (Through Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

..... 54/2004, 81/2004 & 198/2004 page 2 of 108 kumar has been sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and also fine of rs.80,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment of 1 year for the offence punishable under section 302 ipc; rigorous imprisonment for two years and fine of rs.1,000/- and in default thereof to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for one month for the offence punishable under section 330 ipc; and rigorous imprisonment for six months and fine of rs.500/- in default thereof to ..... by special leave, the privy council, relying upon section 230 of the code of criminal procedure, 1898 concurred with the judgment of the federal court that the amended charge was maintainable and observed that as has been pointed out in the earlier part of this judgment, the whole of the facts, which would justify equally a charge under s. ..... provision would show that in order to invoke the exception, the following essentials must be satisfied: (1) the person accused of murder must be a public servant as defined in section 21 ipc; (2) the act must have been done in good faith; (3) the offender must have believed the act to be lawful and necessary for the due discharge of this duty as a public servant; and (4) the act must have been done without any ill-will towards the victim.153. ..... also submits that the appellant dahiya, based on the complaint filed, had acted promptly and as per chapter 25 of the punjab police rules suspended constable anil kumar immediately. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 03 2018 (HC)

Sher Singh vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

..... 54/2004, 81/2004 & 198/2004 page 2 of 108 kumar has been sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and also fine of rs.80,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment of 1 year for the offence punishable under section 302 ipc; rigorous imprisonment for two years and fine of rs.1,000/- and in default thereof to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for one month for the offence punishable under section 330 ipc; and rigorous imprisonment for six months and fine of rs.500/- in default thereof to ..... by special leave, the privy council, relying upon section 230 of the code of criminal procedure, 1898 concurred with the judgment of the federal court that the amended charge was maintainable and observed that as has been pointed out in the earlier part of this judgment, the whole of the facts, which would justify equally a charge under s. ..... provision would show that in order to invoke the exception, the following essentials must be satisfied: (1) the person accused of murder must be a public servant as defined in section 21 ipc; (2) the act must have been done in good faith; (3) the offender must have believed the act to be lawful and necessary for the due discharge of this duty as a public servant; and (4) the act must have been done without any ill-will towards the victim.153. ..... also submits that the appellant dahiya, based on the complaint filed, had acted promptly and as per chapter 25 of the punjab police rules suspended constable anil kumar immediately. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 03 2018 (HC)

Anil Kumar vs.state

Court : Delhi

..... 54/2004, 81/2004 & 198/2004 page 2 of 108 kumar has been sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and also fine of rs.80,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment of 1 year for the offence punishable under section 302 ipc; rigorous imprisonment for two years and fine of rs.1,000/- and in default thereof to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for one month for the offence punishable under section 330 ipc; and rigorous imprisonment for six months and fine of rs.500/- in default thereof to ..... by special leave, the privy council, relying upon section 230 of the code of criminal procedure, 1898 concurred with the judgment of the federal court that the amended charge was maintainable and observed that as has been pointed out in the earlier part of this judgment, the whole of the facts, which would justify equally a charge under s. ..... provision would show that in order to invoke the exception, the following essentials must be satisfied: (1) the person accused of murder must be a public servant as defined in section 21 ipc; (2) the act must have been done in good faith; (3) the offender must have believed the act to be lawful and necessary for the due discharge of this duty as a public servant; and (4) the act must have been done without any ill-will towards the victim.153. ..... also submits that the appellant dahiya, based on the complaint filed, had acted promptly and as per chapter 25 of the punjab police rules suspended constable anil kumar immediately. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 27 2017 (HC)

Federation of Retired Lic Class I Officer vs.uoi & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... the supreme court after referring to the life insurance corporation act, 1956 (for short, the lic act ), vide judgment and order dated 31st march, 2016, held that the board resolution dated 24th november, 2001 to amend the lic of india (employees) pension rules, 1955 (pension rules for short), for upgrading the basic pension to all india consumer price index of 1740 point and 100 per cent dearness allowance neutralization thereon in respect ..... scc (l&s) 1 (1983) 2 scr165 was that the benefits of liberalisation and the extent thereof given in accordance with the wp(c)184/2007 & connected matters page 39 of 90 liberalised pension scheme have to be given equally to all retirees irrespective of their date of retirement and those benefits cannot be confined only to the persons who retired on or after the specified date because for the purpose of grant of the benefits of liberalisation in pension, all retirees constitute one class irrespective of their ..... (see paragraph 2.35 of the fourth central pay commission s report, part-ii relating to pension).64. ..... xxxx (p) pension includes the basic pension and the additional pension referred to in chapter vi of these rules; xxxx amount of pension - (1) in respect of employees 35 ..... noticing the adverse effect of the ballooning pension bill, the central government has introduced the contributory national pension scheme with effect from 01.01.2004. ..... (the position has changed with effect from 01.01.2004 with the introduction of the national pension scheme. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //