Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: central agricultural university act 1992 section 39 protection of action taken in good faith Court: andhra pradesh state consumer disputes redressal commission scdrc hyderabad

Jul 05 2011 (TRI)

Ratna Raja Nursery Chinee, Lime Seedlings and Budded Plant Suppliers V ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

..... the main case of the appellants/opp.parties that they are registered as no.6 of a.p.agricultural university and exs.b1 to b12 evidence that these plants were purchased from agricultural university and that their nursery has nothing to do with defects, if any, in the plants ..... exs.b1 to b12 evidence that these opposite parties purchased the said satgudi bud sticks from the agricultural university whose brochure states the yield to be 1000 to 2000 fruits per tree. ..... kind or variety or other than notified kind or variety of seeds shall ensure that the standards of quality of seeds claimed by him shall conform to the standards prescribed for the notified kind or variety of seeds under section 6 of the seeds act, 1966 (54 of 1966) and any other additional standards, relating to size , colour and content of the label as may be specified. ..... you suspect that it is due to new pest or pathogen , plant protection personnel(entomologist and plant pathologist) will be sent to your place. ..... of sweet orange as per nabard guidelines which the horticultural officer has given as follows: table ex.a19 is a certificate issued by the mro in which he certified that there is clear genetical variation in respect of the farmers following good crop management practices and that the fruits are unfit for consumption. ..... parties have not chosen to file any application for sending the seeds to any laboratory in the instant case opposite parties were set exparte and no steps were taken for sending the samples for testing. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2013 (TRI)

The Manager, Indian Bank, Kongareddypalli Branch Chittoor Branch and A ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

..... interest): (i) disbursed up to march 31, 2007 and overdue as on december 31, 2007 and remaining unpaid until february 29, 2008; (ii) restructured and rescheduled by banks in 2004 and in 2006 through the special packages announced by the central government, whether overdue or not; and (iii) restructured and rescheduled in the normal course upto march 31, 2007 as per applicable rbi guidelines on account of natural calamities, whether overdue or not. ..... the complainant submitted that due to drought prevailed at the relevant period, he could not discharge the loan and even after the debt waive scheme is introduced by the central government , he approached the opposite party-bank on 14.11.2007 to discharge the loan and the opposite party informed him that it sold the pledged gold items in auction and after adjusting ..... for filing complaint under the provisions of the consumer protection act is 2 years from the date of cause of action. ..... (a) advances against pledge or hypothecation of agricultural produce other than standing crop; and (b) agricultural finance to corporates, partnership firms, societies other than cooperative credit institutions (referred to in para 3.4), and any ..... obliviously the district forum might have taken into consideration of the mental tension suffered by the complainant owing to the fact that he cannot claim for the return of gold ornaments on account of prohibition imposed by law of limitation to seek for such ..... fast rule can be laid down for universal application. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //