Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: cattletrespass act 1871 Court: delhi Page 8 of about 120 results (0.038 seconds)

Meera Devi and Others Vs. Jitender and Others

Court : Delhi

..... order, nor, without the leave of the court, to cross-examine any witness upon any answer given in reply to any such question: provided that the judgment must be based upon facts declared by this act to be relevant, and duly proved: provided also that this section shall not authorise any judge to compel any witness to answer any question or to produce any document which such witness would be entitled to ..... anil kumar verma, (1995) 1 scc 421, the supreme court observed that to enable the courts to ward off unjustified interference in their working, those who indulge in immoral acts like perjury, pre-variation and motivated falsehoods have to be appropriately dealt with, without which it would not be possible for any court to administer justice in the true sense and to the satisfaction of those ..... is the common course of natural events, human conduct and public or private business, and the section proceeds on the assumption that just as in nature there prevails a fixed order of things, so the volitional acts of men placed in similar circumstances exhibits, on the whole, a distinct uniformity which is traceable to the impulses of human nature, customs and habits of society. ..... 15.5 the framers of the act, in the report of the select committee published on 31st march, 1871 along with the bill settled by them, observed: in many cases, the judge has to get at the truth, or as near to it as he can by the aid of collateral inquiries, which may incidentally tend to something relevant; and .....

Ansar Alam and ors. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1998VAD(Delhi)148; 73(1998)DLT706

..... no doubt article 226 of the constitution prescribes no period of limitation but the period fixed by the limitation act within which a suit in civil court must be brought can ordinarily be taken as reasonable standard by which delay in seeking the remedy under article 226 can be measured. ..... 5087/97, 805/98, 1871/96, 4927/97, 1516/98, 1484/98 and 1485/98:-by these writ petitions under article 226 of the constitution, the petitioners have challenged the selection and appointments of candidates on the same grounds mentioned earlier. .....

ibp Co. Limited Vs. Nand Kishore Bajpai and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 147(2008)DLT764

..... conditions as may be applicable at that time.6.0 nomination of a person by the landowner as a contractor to run the retail outlet on coco basis does not give any right to the landowner to make any claims on the corporation on account of any acts or deeds or such person.7.0 ioc will enter into two agreements i.e. ..... legitimate expectation and the provisions of the act cannot be read together to mean that the terms of the auction and the lease deed should be ignored.reference can also be made to the case of bannari amman sugars ltd. v. ..... 2821/07 1871 sq.mtrs 18.10.2002 30 years mandh contract sanjay goel v. .....

Re-M/S Kamla Syntex Ltd. Vs..........

Court : Delhi

..... the legislature took care to declare that irrespective of time when a debt is created in respect of the assets of the establishment, the dues payable under the act would always remain first charge and shall be paid first out of the assets of the establishment notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in ..... as has been stated, there has been a long delay in filing the proof, but a claim is within the period of limitation prescribed by the limitation act, the only consequence of the delay will be that prescribed by section 474 of the companies act according to which a creditor, who does not prove his debt or claim within the time fixed by the court, has to be excluded from the benefit of any distribution made before ..... to the secured creditors and workers, on pari passu basis, keeping in view the provisions of sections 529 and 529 a of the companies act, 1956, dividend to be distributed to the secured creditors and the workers would be in the following manner: canara bank hfc essenda finanze pvt ..... in march 1871, the holder of some bills of exchange to a large amount, which had become payable in february, 1865, gave the first notice of his claim and applied for leave to ..... based on the decision in in re general rolling stock company 1871 (7) ch. ..... made in february 1865 and the certificate of debts and claims was made in december 1870 a dividend was paid on the established debts in january, 1871. ..... by the decision in in re general rolling stock company 1871 (7) ch. .....

Uoi (thr.g.m.northern Railway) vs.mohammad Akhtar & Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... govt of india, from 12th april 1958 to 31st of may 1995 as a driver, the respondent, consequent to his retirement, moved the learned labour court, sometime in july 1996, by way of an application under section 33-c (2) of the industrial disputes act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the act ), registered as lca1371996, claiming that the petitioner had illegally deducted, from the retiral benefits due to him, an amount of rs. ..... at the very outset, it is apparent that the reliance, by the respondent, on the payment of gratuity act, is totally misplaced; it is probably for this reason that this argument has not figured before any of the authorities before ..... chand (supra), it is sought to be submitted, was distinguishable on facts, and did not, in any case, lay down any law; moreover, the respondent submits that his case is covered by the payment of gratuity act, unlike wazir chand (supra), which dealt with the retirement of a railway officer. ..... the preamble to the payment of gratuity act itself states that it is an act to provide for a scheme for the payment of gratuity to employees engaged in factories, mines, oilfields, plantations, ports, railway companies, shops or other establishments and for matters connected therewith or incidental ..... specified in sub-clause(a) of clause (i) of this sub-rule shall be made subject to the conditions laid down in rule 8 being satisfied from recurring pensions and also commuted value thereof, which are governed by the pensions act, 1873 (23 of 1871). .....

d.d.a. & Ors. Vs.ram Kaur & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... the document is just a photocopy and it is not admissible in evidence for the reasons that neither it is proved in terms of sections 61, 62, 63, 65, 66, 74 & 76 of indian evidence act, 1872 nor the contents of the document confirm to the contents of the original resolution no.10 dated 28.01.1943 produced before the court, and also from the various sale deeds executed contradicts the plaintiffs document ex. ..... there is no dispute that resolution no.10 dated 28.01.1943 is an official document being a resolution and thus a public document as defined in section 74 of indian evidence act and under clause section 65 (e), the secondary evidence is admissible which should be the certified copy of the document and no other kind of secondary evidence is admissible. ex. ..... the supreme court in anil rishi vs gurbaksh singh, (2006) 5 scc558held that- in terms of section 102 (indian evidence act, 1872) the initial onus is always on the plaintiff to prove his case and if he discharges that onus and makes out a case which entitles him to a relief, the onus shifts to the defendant to prove those circumstances if ..... the matter was referred to the estate officer viii to initiate action under public premises act for evicting the unauthorized occupants but dda was informed that in terms of the field report dated 29.9.1983 there were no jhuggi dwellers on plot no.18. ..... yds 3rfa4092004 & lpa582005 page 49 11 mr mohammad 1871 sq. ..... din 1871 sq. .....

Mcd vs.d.r. Parashar & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... the document is just a photocopy and it is not admissible in evidence for the reasons that neither it is proved in terms of sections 61, 62, 63, 65, 66, 74 & 76 of indian evidence act, 1872 nor the contents of the document confirm to the contents of the original resolution no.10 dated 28.01.1943 produced before the court, and also from the various sale deeds executed contradicts the plaintiffs document ex. ..... there is no dispute that resolution no.10 dated 28.01.1943 is an official document being a resolution and thus a public document as defined in section 74 of indian evidence act and under clause section 65 (e), the secondary evidence is admissible which should be the certified copy of the document and no other kind of secondary evidence is admissible. ex. ..... the supreme court in anil rishi vs gurbaksh singh, (2006) 5 scc558held that- in terms of section 102 (indian evidence act, 1872) the initial onus is always on the plaintiff to prove his case and if he discharges that onus and makes out a case which entitles him to a relief, the onus shifts to the defendant to prove those circumstances if ..... the matter was referred to the estate officer viii to initiate action under public premises act for evicting the unauthorized occupants but dda was informed that in terms of the field report dated 29.9.1983 there were no jhuggi dwellers on plot no.18. ..... yds 3rfa4092004 & lpa582005 page 49 11 mr mohammad 1871 sq. ..... din 1871 sq. .....

Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Sunni Majlis Aukaf and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1968Delhi216

..... one of the first and highest duties of all courts is to take care that the act of the court does no injury to any of the suitors', does nto, in my view, mean that whenever a court after wrongly deciding a case between two parties discovers that the decision was erroneous, it has inherent jurisdiction to ..... the comptoir d'escompte de paris, (1871) lr 3 pc 465 in the following words:- '. . . . . .....

Bharath Skins Corporation Vs. Taneja Skins Company Pvt. Ltd

Court : Delhi

..... article 1 is thus in effect, to apply the old english common law of acknowledgement (which is different from the acknowledgments and payments referred to in sections 18 and 19 of the limitation act, 1963) to a certain type of cases for the purpose of exempting the plaintiff from the principle that limitation runs against each item from its date, and to provide that if the last ..... has expressly stated that for purposes of limitation, article 1 of the schedule to the rfa(os) 13/2002 page 2 of 15 limitation act 1963 would apply, but it is apparent from the reasoning of the learned single judge that he had applied article 1 of the schedule to the limitation act, 1963 while determining issue no.2, which article provides that in case of a suit filed for recovery of balance due on a mutual, ..... given by one party to the rfa(os) 13/2002 page 3 of 15 other is an admission of there being an unsettled account between them, the amount of which is afterwards to be ascertained; and any act which the jury may consider as an acknowledgment of its being an open account is sufficient to take the case out of the statute.".9. ..... kesharichand jaisukhlal v the shillong banking corporation the supreme court defined the scope of the expression mutual occurring in article 85 of the schedule to the indian limitation act, 1908 (precursor to article 1 of the schedule to the limitation act, 1963) in the following terms:- "the next point in issue is whether the proceedings are governed by art.85. ..... act ix of 1871 .....

Kshetra Pal Singh Vs. Nct of Delhi and ors

Court : Delhi

..... ) 13 scc 637.it was held that termination of services was not justified if a driver was held guilty of misconduct of driving a bus into a barrier, once it was proved that the incident happened not on account of any deliberate act but negligence of the driver.16. ..... (6) memo not f18(5)/87-mc/1871 dated 9th aug. .....