Court : Delhi
$~R-5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment Pronounced on:08. 02.2019 Judgment Reserved on:23.01.2019 W.P. (C) 9001/2006, 12690/2006, 12691/2006 BABU LAL & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Rajiv Agarwal, Advocate. versus GENERAL MANAGER, NORTHERN RAILWAY ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Geetanjali Mohan, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.1. The present writ petition has been filed assailing the award dated 01.06.2005 passed by the learned Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No.II in ID No.31/2000 whereby the learned Labour Court answered the reference against the petitioners/workmen and has held that they are not entitled for a temporary status under the Northern Railway as they were engaged as casual workers by the Northern Railway Sports Association (hereinafter referred to as NRSA) for working at Railways Karnail Singh Stadium. W.P.(C ) No.9001/2006 Page 1 of 8 2. The petitioner no.1 was engaged as a peon on 01.05.1990 at initial salar...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~13 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:11. 03.2019 + W.P.(C) 4596/2018 & CM APPL. 17760, 27817/2018 & CRL.M.A. 12728/2018 BAPU MARKET ASSOCIATION Through: Mr. Ravinder Tyagi, Advocate versus ........ Petitioner NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. H.S. Phoolka, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) The petitioners claim to be the members of the petitioner association.1. They also claim to be regular Teh-bazari holders of Kiosks at Bapu Market, Gandhi Maidan, Chandani Chowk, Delhi. The members of the petitioner association received a notice dated 24.04.2018 calling upon them to vacate the Teh-bazari sites by 30.04.2018 failing which eviction action would be taken by the Department.2. The members of the petitioner association have filed this writ petition seeking the following prayers: a) Kindly issue a Writ Of Mandamus Or Any Other Ap...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~3 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 3225/2016 Decided on:18. h March, 2019 BANARSI LAL GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Pawan Narang, Mr. Siddharth Handa, Mr. Ketan Goel & Mr. Himanshu Sethi, Advs. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. Upon consideration of the report (cancellation report) under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) dated 05.02.2013, submitted on conclusion of investigation into first information report (FIR) No.32/2008 of police station Pahar Ganj, the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (ACMM) took cognizance of offence punishable under Section 431 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and summoned M/s B L Gupta Construction Pvt. Ltd. along with two of its directors including the petitioner (Managing Director) and his wife Aruna Gupta (Director) as accused.2. The said two persons including the petitioner assai...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI NISHANT STATE ROHIT Reserved on:10. h January, 2019 Decided on:1. t July, 2019 CRL.A. 647/2016 Represented by: Mr. Rajiv Bajaj, Advocate ..... Appellant versus Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for ..... Respondent the State CRL.A. 924/2016 ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Dhan Mohan, Mr. Tanu B. Mishra, Mr. Ravi Mishra, Ms. Harkamal Jeet Kaur, Ms. Roshni Rani and Mr. Gaura Bindal, Advocates STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 Nishant and Rohit challenge the impugned judgment dated 26th May, 2016 convicting them for offence punishable under Section 3IPC and the order on sentence dated 30th May, 2016 directing them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of four years and six months each and to pay a fine of 10,000/- each, in default whereof to undergo simple Crl.A.647/2016 & Crl.A.924/2016 Page 1 of 6 imprisonment for a period ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI NISHANT STATE ROHIT Reserved on:10. h January, 2019 Decided on:1. t July, 2019 CRL.A. 647/2016 Represented by: Mr. Rajiv Bajaj, Advocate ..... Appellant versus Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for ..... Respondent the State CRL.A. 924/2016 ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Dhan Mohan, Mr. Tanu B. Mishra, Mr. Ravi Mishra, Ms. Harkamal Jeet Kaur, Ms. Roshni Rani and Mr. Gaura Bindal, Advocates STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 Nishant and Rohit challenge the impugned judgment dated 26th May, 2016 convicting them for offence punishable under Section 3IPC and the order on sentence dated 30th May, 2016 directing them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of four years and six months each and to pay a fine of 10,000/- each, in default whereof to undergo simple Crl.A.647/2016 & Crl.A.924/2016 Page 1 of 6 imprisonment for a period ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~66 * + Date of Decision:24. 7.2019 % W.P.(C.) No.7954/2019 BALJEET SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankit Jain, Advocate with Mr. Siddhant Nath, Mr. Shiven Khurrana, Ms. Aayushi, & Mr. Sarmas, Advocates. Versus GOVERNMENT OF NCTD & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel GNCTD (Services) with Mr. N.K. Singh, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR RAJNISH BHATNAGAR, J.(ORAL) CM No.329Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C.) No.7954/2019 Page 1 of 16 W.P.(C) No.791. Issue notice. Counsel for the respondents accepts notice. We have heard learned counsels for the parties, perused the record, and we proceed to dispose of the petition at this stage itself.2. The petitioner has filed the present writ of certiorari, inter alia, with the following prayers : To set aside the order dated 02.11.2018 passed in O.A. No.11...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) 9878/2018 & CM APPL. 38484/2018 GHALIB ZEYAD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Varma, and Mr. Ms.Mannat Mr.Akhil Kumar Gola, Advs. Vedanta Sandhu versus JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY & ORS..Respondents Through: Ms. Monika Arora, SC for JNU with Mr. Harsh Ahuja, Mr. Kushal Kumar and Mr. Praveen Singh, Advs. Mr. Ravinder Agarwal, Adv. for UGC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR % 1. The petitioner is a student, who aspires to pursue the M.Phil. JUDGMENT0508.2019 programme with the Jawaharlal Nehru University (Respondent No.1 herein and referred to, hereinafter, as JNU). He is visually impaired, suffering from 100% blindness in his right eye and 50% blindness in his left eye. Facts 2. One may commence the recital of the relevant facts, in the present case, with the clearing, by the petitioner, of the first year of his W.P. (C) 9878/2018 Page 1 of 26 Bachelor of Arts (B.A.) Examination, from the Maulana ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~29 & 30 * % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:02. 09.2019 MAC.APP. 762/2019 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant versus LOKESH VERMA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS MAC.APP. 763/2019 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Versus LOKESH VERMA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Rawat, Advocate for appellant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) MAC.APP. 762/2019, CM APPL. 39298/2019 & CM APPL. 39299/2019 MAC.APP. 763/2019, CM APPL. 39359/2019 & CM APPL. 39360/2019 1. The award of compensation dated 31.05.2019 passed by the Ld. MACT in MACP No.81/2016 is impugned on the ground that the injured himself has stated that his motorcycle had been hit from behind by a tempo. Therefore, the impugned order has erred in awarding compensation apropos the same accident having been caused by the insured Santro Car bearing MAC.APP. Nos. 762 & 763 of 2019 Page 1 of 10 Registration No.DL7CE6876. Mr. Rawat, the learned counsel for ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~29 & 30 * % + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:02. 09.2019 MAC.APP. 762/2019 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant versus LOKESH VERMA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS MAC.APP. 763/2019 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Versus LOKESH VERMA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Rawat, Advocate for appellant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) MAC.APP. 762/2019, CM APPL. 39298/2019 & CM APPL. 39299/2019 MAC.APP. 763/2019, CM APPL. 39359/2019 & CM APPL. 39360/2019 1. The award of compensation dated 31.05.2019 passed by the Ld. MACT in MACP No.81/2016 is impugned on the ground that the injured himself has stated that his motorcycle had been hit from behind by a tempo. Therefore, the impugned order has erred in awarding compensation apropos the same accident having been caused by the insured Santro Car bearing MAC.APP. Nos. 762 & 763 of 2019 Page 1 of 10 Registration No.DL7CE6876. Mr. Rawat, the learned counsel for ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:09. 10.2019 REVIEW PET. 360/2019 and CM APPL. 39523/2019 (Stay) + in W.P.(C) 8188/2019 MAN MOHAN PANDEY AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath and Mr. B.K. versus Pandey, Advs. BHARAT ELECTRONICS LIMITED AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr. Manish Paliwal, Mr. Vikas Kumar, Mr. Viplav Acharya, Advs. and Mr. B.V. Ramaiyya, DGM, Legal, BEL./ R-1 Mr. Vijay Joshi, Sr. Panel Counsel for R-2/UOI Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr. Rohan Anand, Adv. and Mr. Waize Ali Noor, GP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby to recall the order dated 31.07.2019 passed by this Court in WP(C) No.8188/2019.2. At the outset, it is pointed out that in Para 19 of order dated REVIEW PET. 360/2019 in W.P.(C) 8188/2019 Page 1 of 11 31.07.2019, it is recorded that the petitioners are above level E-VIII; howe...
Tag this Judgment!