Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: capacitor Court: madhya pradesh Page 1 of about 23 results (0.030 seconds)

Dec 15 2006 (HC)

Asian Electronics Ltd. Vs. M.P. State Electricity Board

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-15-2006

Reported in : 2007(3)ARBLR22(MP); 2007(2)MPLJ144

..... 10,80,059 being the outstanding amount of invoices raised for the work of installation, commissioning and monitoring of the capacitor banks at various divisions of the respondent. ..... 1,25,66,256 being the outstanding amount of the supply of switched type capacitor bank.(b) rs. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 09 1989 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Steel Tubes of India (P.) Ltd.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-09-1989

Reported in : [1989]180ITR159(MP)

..... bhandari capacitor private ltd. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 14 1995 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Bhandari Capacitors (P.) Ltd.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-14-1995

Reported in : [1996]218ITR162(MP)

..... briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee derived income from the manufacture and sale of capacitors. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 08 1991 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Vikram Metal Powder Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-08-1991

Reported in : [1992]193ITR741(MP)

v. s. kokje j. - this is an application under section 256(2) of the income-tax act, 1961 (for short 'the act') by the commissioner of income-tax, bhopal, praying for a direction to the income-tax appellate tribunal, indore bench, to frame the following question and refer it to this court for its opinion :'whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the income-tax appellate tribunal was legally correct in directing the income-tax officer to apply the decision of the madhya pradesh high court in the case of cit v. bhandari capacitors pvt. ltd. : [1987]168itr647(mp) by which the hon ble high court had held that the amount of capital subsidy is not deductible from the actual cost of the assets for the purpose of allowing depreciation ?'an application under section 256(1) of the income-tax act was moved before the tribunal which rejected it following the decision of this court in cit v. bhandari capacitors p. ltd. : [1987]168itr647(mp) . a division bench of this court in cwt v. smt. usha devi : [1990]183itr75(mp) has held that where the tribunal has passed an order following the decision of the high court in another case, the court would be justified in rejecting an application under section 256(2) and pendency of the point before the supreme court is no ground for allowing the application. in view of the aforesaid decision, no referable question survives before us. the application is, therefore rejected with no order as to costs.

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 1995 (HC)