Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: calcutta metro railway operation and maintenance temporary provisions act 1985 section 12 penalty for travelling on roof etc of a train Court: rajasthan

Mar 16 2001 (HC)

Ganpati Plaza Maintenance Society Vs. K.K. Complex Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2001(4)WLN42

..... and at any time hereafter in future at its discretion the promoter shall have the unfettered right and be entitled to form a society (either under societies registration act, co-operative society act) or any association or any other body corporate or the responsibilily of maintenance of common amenities and common services described hereunder and/or with such other object or ..... /services appertaining to the same.39(a). pending formation of the society or body corporate as stated in clause 38 above entire maintenance upkeep and preservation of the said complex, operation of the common services and management of common areas therein shall be done by the promoter or its nominee on the terms and conditions mentioned herein unless agreed to separately .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 30 1954 (HC)

Sajjan Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1954Raj301

..... the applicant on the principle laid down in this case, namely that the high court has power under section 151 to stay the operation of its own order pending appeal to the supreme court. assuming, but not deciding, that this view is correct, it may be ..... order 45 shall be applicable as far as possible. it seems to us that if there is no decree or positive order the operation of which can be stayed, this provision cannot apply even after the supreme court has granted special leave to appeal.we are, ..... nothing pending before us the hearing of which we can stay.7. in -- 'jewan ram gangaram & co. v. commrs. for port of calcutta', air 1939 cal 308 (c), it was held that the high court could stay execution under inherent powers, though the matter may not fall ..... decree under section 151 where order 45, rule 13 did not apply in terms.6. in -- 'sarat kumar v. official assignee of calcutta', air 1931 cal 79 (b), there was an appeal to the privy council from an order of the high court setting aside an .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 05 1959 (HC)

Jaipur Spinning and Weaving Mills, Ltd. Vs. Jaipur Spinning and Weavin ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : (1959)IILLJ656Raj

..... word, 'award' has been defined to include both. an interim award of course contemplates a provisional or temporary arrangement made in cases of urgency to remain in operation till the final award, but nevertheless it is an award. the language of section 10(4) is quite general and must govern all awards, whether final or ..... main thing. obviously, matters which require independent consideration or treatment and have their own importance, cannot be considered 'incidental.' these words came up for interpretation in two recent calcutta cases hukumchand jute mills, ltd. v. labour appellate tribunal a.i.r. 1958 cal. 63 and workmen of bengal electric lamp works, ltd. v. bengal electric ..... process should be adopted for running the 10s counts the second question related to the number of helpers that should be provided on each six siders when operating double sides. no question of increase in wages even as an alternative measure was contemplated and referred to the tribunal. it may be pointed out that .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //