Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: calcutta metro railway operation and maintenance temporary provisions act 1985 section 11 prohibition of demonstrations upon the metro railway Sorted by: old Court: rajasthan

Aug 30 1954 (HC)

Sajjan Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1954Raj301

..... the applicant on the principle laid down in this case, namely that the high court has power under section 151 to stay the operation of its own order pending appeal to the supreme court. assuming, but not deciding, that this view is correct, it may be ..... order 45 shall be applicable as far as possible. it seems to us that if there is no decree or positive order the operation of which can be stayed, this provision cannot apply even after the supreme court has granted special leave to appeal.we are, ..... nothing pending before us the hearing of which we can stay.7. in -- 'jewan ram gangaram & co. v. commrs. for port of calcutta', air 1939 cal 308 (c), it was held that the high court could stay execution under inherent powers, though the matter may not fall ..... decree under section 151 where order 45, rule 13 did not apply in terms.6. in -- 'sarat kumar v. official assignee of calcutta', air 1931 cal 79 (b), there was an appeal to the privy council from an order of the high court setting aside an .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //