Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: calcutta metro railway operation and maintenance temporary provisions act 1985 section 11 prohibition of demonstrations upon the metro railway Page 9 of about 107 results (5.847 seconds)

Oct 18 2016 (SC)

Lanco Anpara Power Ltd. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... only undertaken the process of construction of premises which are to be ultimately used as factories, and since such power project has not started and there was no operation for which the licence was obtained under the factories act till the production commences, it could not be said that factory has come into existence and, therefore, ..... under the factories act for registration to work a factory, the appellants were still not excluded from the provisions of welfare cess act as no manufacturing process or factory operation had started by the appellants and, therefore, appellants did not answer the description of 'factory' within the meaning of factories act. as per the high court, ..... aid of power, or is ordinarily so carried on,- but does not include a mine subject to the operation of [the mines act, 1952 (35 of 1952)]. or [a mobile unit belonging to the armed forces of the union, a railway running shed or a hotel, restaurant or eating place].. [explanation [i]. - for computing the number of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 20 1922 (FN)

Cumberland Tel. and Tel. Co. Vs. Louisiana P.S.C.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... for the eastern district of louisiana syllabus 1. upon appeal from an order merely refusing a preliminary injunction, under jud.code 266, there is nothing upon which a supersedeas may operate. p. 260 u. s. 215 . 2. under jud.code, 266, a single judge, in allowing an appeal from an order of the district court, constituted of three judges, ..... issued a mandamus directing him to annul the order of vacation. we are of opinion that a single judge has no power, in view of 266, to affect the operation of the order of the court constituted by the three judges granting or denying the interlocutory injunction applied for. to hold that he may grant a temporary injunction varying ..... judges who have heard the whole matter, have read the record, and can pass on the issue without additional labor. that was the course taken by this court in southern railway co. v. watts, 259 u.s. 576. a similar order will be made here. the action of the district court thus constituted, however, will not revive or vitalize .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 16 1948 (FN)

Seaboard Air Line R. Co. Vs. Daniel

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the complaint also asserted that the order, by explicit reference to the commission finding in its report, affirmatively authorized appellant to own and operate the entire railway system without complying with the south carolina railroad corporation laws. [ footnote 4 ] the answer to the complaint did not challenge the ..... the appellant, seaboard air line railroad company, with the approval of the interstate commerce commission, succeeded to the ownership and operation of a unitary railroad system with 4,200 railway miles in six southern states. seven hundred and thirty-six miles of its lines traverse south carolina connecting with its lines ..... with congressional enactments applicable to railroads. in furtherance of this congressional policy, these agencies approved reorganization plans which called for the purchase and operation of these properties, including the portion in south carolina, by appellant, as a virginia corporation. this court has previously approved a commission .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 27 2005 (HC)

Thane Municipal Transport, Undertaking and Transport Manager, Thane Mu ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (2005)107BOMLR623; (2006)ILLJ874Bom

..... a view to their use, transport or sale;(g) establishment in which any work relating to the construction, development or maintenance of buildings, roads, bridges or canals, or relating to operation connected with navigation, irrigation, development or maintenance of buildings, roads, bridges or mission and distribution of electricity or any other form of power is being carried on;(h) any other ..... or 1936) or(ii) a factory as defined in clause (m) of section 2 of the factories act, 1948 (63 of 1948);(iii) a railway as defined in clause (iv) of section 2 of the indian railways act, 1890 (9 of 1890);the definition of 'industrial establishment' under the payment of wages act, 1936 in sub-clause (ii) of section 2 reads .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 20 1950 (HC)

The Bangalore District Hotel Owners' Association Vs. the District Magi ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1951Kant14; AIR1951Mys14

..... carry on any occupation, trade or business. under sub-clause (6) of that article it is provided that nothing in sub-clause (g) of the said clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it imposes, or prevents the state from making any law imposing in the interests of the general public reasonable restrictions on the ..... a case of an application for the issue of a writ of mandamus, the applicant claimed that in consequence of his appointment for two years as a lecturer in the calcutta university he was entitled to receive certain remuneration, but that after the first year the governor-general in council had refused to sanction his appointment and the senate had declined .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 24 1997 (HC)

Smt. Kathiza and Others Vs. the District Magistrate and Deputy Commiss ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1998KAR537; 1998(1)KarLJ162

..... before the date of the notifications concerned. even then, the exceptions provided for in section 115 in this regard do not amount to discriminating the subsequent operators vis-avis those who had obtained permits prior to the date of the notification. section 115 is not violative of article 14 of the constitution. ..... where more and more educational institutions are permitted to be started in a particular neighbourhood, the supreme court deferred to the very principle when the existing operators questioned the liberal policy of the motor vehicles act, 1988 in the matter of granting permits. as noticed earlier, the supreme court emphasised the eventual ..... to the existing operators may also be taken or the area may be thrown open to the fresh stage carriages.(c) the next decision relied upon by the learned counsel for the appellants is corporation of calcutta v calcutta tramways company limited, calcutta. the supreme court was considering section 437(1)(b) of the calcutta municipal act, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 15 2001 (HC)

Apsrtc, Musheerabad, Hyd. Vs. State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Hyd. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : II(2001)ACC760; II(2002)ACC337; 2001(3)ALD235; 2001(2)ALT532

..... reserve to maintain the services and to provide for specialoccasions.12 1/2% of the total number ofvehicles required for the operation of scheduled services will be kept inservice.7.the arrangements proposedfor housing maintenance and repair of the vehicles.the existing depot atvisakhapatnam, bhima-varam and ..... place and everything is in its place.30. in anantha kumar v. state of west bengal, 1999 (4) slr 661, a division bench of the calcutta high court has noticed the authorities as regards purposive construction. in francis bennion statutory interpretation, second edition, as regards the rule of 'purposive construction', it ..... of other persons.the following number of tripsare proposed to be performed to the complete exclusion of other personsexcept holders of the existing stage carriage permits operating on theportions of the route in east godavari and visakhapatnam districts. (a) maximum number3 (b) minimum number16.number of vehicles intendedto be kept in .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 04 1998 (HC)

Saroj Kumari, Teacher Govt. Girls Sr. Sec. School, Ferozepur and ors. ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1998)120PLR123

..... in the strike on 8th february, 1978 :- (i) they will be granted the premature increment in the scale of pay in which they were working on 8th february, 1978, by operation of rule 4.10 of the punjab civil services rules, volume i, para i. this increment will not disturb the date of normal increment which would be admissible on the ..... .the benefit is to be allowed to employee is admissible to working in punjab government such employees offices outside the state i.e. delhi, provided it was a faridabad and calcutta, if they did working day in not participate in the strike on the punjab govt. 8.2.78. offices located at those places. vii. whether the benefit of premature yes .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 22 1961 (SC)

State of Bihar Vs. Lt. Col. K.S.R. Swami

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1966SC1847; 1962(0)BLJR333; [1962]3SCR727

..... the land of this and certain other 'protected forests' for cultivation. as local employees of the forest department acting under the divisional forest officer, gaya, started interfering with the agricultural operations carried on on behalf of the petitioner apparently on the strength of this notification of may 29, 1953, the respondent sought the permission of the collector of gaya to start ..... land for cultivation or any other purpose necessarily involving the cutting and removal of trees. 15. on behalf of the appellant-state mr. jha argued that rule 8 has no operation so long as trees are standing and it is only if trees have been cut or removed under the provisions of rules 1, 2 and 3 and only stumps of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 13 2004 (SC)

Jamshed Hormusji Wadia Vs. Board of Trustees, Port of Mumbai and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2004SC1815; 2004(176)ELT24(SC); JT2004(1)SC232; 2004(1)SCALE341; (2004)3SCC214

..... issue decided against him though the order, judgment or decree was in the end in his favour. illustratively, see ramanbhai ashabhai patel : [1965]1scr712 ; management of northern railway co-operative society ltd. : (1967)iillj46sc ; bharat kala bhandar ltd. - : [1966]59itr73(sc) . the learned asg is right. but we would like to clarify that ..... and indulging in whimsical or unreasonable evictions or bargains.19. a balance has to be struck between the two extremes. having been exempted from the operation of rent control legislation the courts cannot hold them tied to the same shackles from which the state and its instrumentalities have been freed by the legislature ..... trusts and other instrumentalities of state. what is the purpose? does the legislatures intend to leave such entitles absolutely unbridled and uncontrolled as landlords from the operation of the rent control legislation or do they do so with some hope and trust in such institutions? in dwarkadas marfatia and sons (supra) a few .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //