Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: borstal school act 1963 Court: rajasthan Page 1 of about 534 results (0.036 seconds)

Kauda Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1982WLN563

..... ), or of any law in force in any state relating to juvenile offenners of borstal schools.this section expressly excludes the operation of its provisions in respect of the acts mentioned therein. ..... of certain enactments: nothing in this act shall affect the provisions of section 31 of the reformatory schools act, 1897(act no. ..... view of the aforesaid decisions of the supreme court and of this court and section 18 of the act of 1958, i am of opinion that benefit of section 4 of the act of 1958 can be granted to an accused who is convicted under section 4(2) of the act though the offence was punishable with two years imprisonment and with fine which may extend to two thousand ..... accused-petitioner was prosecuted for the offence under section 4(2) of the rajasthan prohibition act (no.xvii of 19 9)(here in after referred to as 'the act') for having been found in possession of one bottle of liquor on november ..... the code not to apply in certain areas : subject to the provisions of section 18, section 562 of the code shall cease to apply to the states or parts there of in which this act is brought into force.a learned single judge of this court in smt. ..... mehta contended that though the offence under section 4(2) of the act is punishable with two years imprisonment and with fine which may extend to two thousand rupees, still it does not exclude the applicability of the provisons of ..... trial, he was convicted under section 4(2) of the act and sentenced to six months simple imprisonment and a fine .....

Parmesh Pachar Vs. Convener, Central Undergradutate Admission Board an ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2003(4)Raj2284; 2003(3)WLC137

..... in the opinion of professor roger robinson, retired professor of paediatrics at guy's hospital medical school, london, as expressed in his letter dated 28.6.2002 (referred to above), denial of admission to a candidate by a medical school on the basis of red-green colour blindness is unacceptable and discriminatory. 9. ..... thus, it is clear that in british, american, australian and canadian medical schools, a student suffering from colour blindness is not barred from being admitted. ..... in his email dated 24.6.2002 to the petitioner has confirmed that colour blindness would not preclude the petitioner from applying in medical course at the school of medicine & dentistry, queen mary university of london. ..... far as i know, such a thing is unheard of in any british medical school, and would be regarded as wholly unacceptable discrimination. ..... admissions and outreach counselor, stanford university school of medicine, stanford, canada, in his email message dated 26.6.2002 to the petitioner, has categorically stated that colour blindness does not make the petitioner ineligible to apply for admission, however, it will limit his choices in ..... the second schedule to the indian medical council act, 1956, reveals that bachelor of medicine and bachelor of surgery from university of bristol, university of leeds, university of liverpool, university of london, university of oxford, university of sheffield, university of wales, university of edinburgh, university of glasgow, university of dundee, university of .....

Shri Ram Bishnoi and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2000(2)WLC628; 2000(2)WLN63

..... the coming into force of the order withdrawing recognition under sub-section (1), or where an institution offering a course or training in teacher education immediately before the appointed day fails or neglects to obtain recognition or permission under this act, the qualification in teacher education obtained pursuant to such course or training or after undertaking a course or training in such institution, shall not be treated as a valid qualification for purposesof employment under the central government, any state ..... (iii) persons considered and selected for appointment but not given appointment on the ground that the educational qualification acquired by them through institutions not recognised under the national council for teacher education act, 1993; and(iv) persons who were given appointment on the basis of those qualifications but their certificates are now sought to be terminated because their qualifications are not in conformity with the provisions of the national ..... government or university, or in any school, college or other educational body aided by the central government or any state government.a perusal of the section narrated above, proves that there is nothing in the act to show that the provisions are retrospective and they cannot be so held by the necessary implication also. .....

Raman Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2001CriLJ800; 2001(2)WLC632; 2000(3)WLN39

..... authority since the said ads had no reasonable connection or nexus to the duty or authority imposed upon the officer under the bombay police act or any other enactment conferring power of the police under the colour of which this act was done and that such acts fall completely outside the duties and scope of the policeofficers and they were not entitled to the protection conferred by section 161(1) of ..... indian police service and the said provisions provide for the limitation of three months from the dale of misconduct/offence, and for other remaining police officials, of section 161 of bombay police act, 1951, (applicable in gujarat also), which provides for the limitation of six months and for taking cognizance and for prosecution, two years from the date of offence. ..... was the duty of the said police officers to record the report and so also to file the challan in court and, thus, the acts complained of were done under the colour of office of the said officers and, thus, fell within the ambit of section 140(1) of the act and, therefore, the case had to be filed within limitation provided therein and the suit was found to be barred by limitation having ..... public servant, not removable from his office save by or with sanction of the government, is accused of an offence alleged to have been committed by him while acting or purported to act in the discharge of his official duty, no court shall take cognizance of such offence except with the previous sanction of the competent authority. .....

Mr.Ghanshyam Singh Sisodia Vs. Mr.K.K. Singh

Court : Rajasthan Jaipur

..... state of maharashtra [(2002) 2 scc 135], the apex court has opined that the judges should neither act as a mouthpiece of the prosecution, nor as a post office for the prosecution. .....

Board of Rajasthan and anr. Vs. Rajendra

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2001(4)WLN401

..... rama nandan prasad (4), the supreme c court has held that section 5 of the limitation act, 1963 does not apply if the authority is not a court and the collector acting under section 15 of the kosi area (restoration of lands to raiyats) act, 1951 not a courl, though vested with certain specified powers under the code of civil ..... do not stand to acquire any right of employment nor does any such accrued to them by mere death of such government servant and, therefore, they cannot be allowed to invoke section 6( 1 )(c) of the rajasthan general clauses act which provides that where any rajasthan law repeals any enactment thereto made, then unless a different intention appears, the repeal shall not affect any right, privilege, obligation or liability acquired, accrued or incurred ..... in the third division of the schedule to the limitation act, 1963, all the other applications mentioned in the various articles are applications filed in ..... further section 4 of the limitation act, 1963, provides for the contingency when the prescribed period for any application expires on a holiday and the only contingency contemplated is 'when the court is ..... case it is alleged that the father of the respondent died on 11.10.1996 while working on the post of teacher, government secondary school, khawa which is an establishment/institution of the education department of the government, of rajas-than. ..... according to the respondent his qualification is secondary school examination from board of secondary education in .....

Jhulelal Charitable and Education Trust Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1999Raj309; 2000(1)WLC632

..... the petitioner is misconceived, inasmuch as, no limitation is prescribed for invoking the revisional jurisdiction of additional divisional commissioner, udaipur under section 300 of the rajasthan municipalities act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act of 1959') calling the records from municipal board, nimbahera for the purpose of being satisfied as to the correctness, legality or propriety of the licence dated 12-9-1991 annexure 12 granted to the ..... it is well to remember that in special act, if no limitation is prescribed for filing revision under section 300 of the said act then within the meaning of section 29 of the indian limitation act, 1963 read with article 137 of the said act, the revision can be filed within three ..... 1974 according to which no land shall be allotted for a price less than the sanction reserve price except for categories covered under rule 17 provided that lands for school and other public and charitable institution may be allotted on payment of 50% of the sanctioned reserve price. ..... has been conveniently ignored by the municipal board, nimbahera on non-existent ground that secretary of the institution is living in one portion of the school building whereas according to the terms and conditions of allotment made to respondent no. ..... was raised by the municipal board, nimbahera and the collector, chktorgarh, the secretary of the school shifted to some other place. ..... school ..... which licence is granted to the petitioner on 12-9-1991 a school is being run by it. .....

Amar Singh Vs. Ghanshyam and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1998Raj333; 1999(2)WLC407; 1998(1)WLN365

..... profits thereof are distinct causes of action, so that a person who has been dispossessed of immovable property, is entitled to sue for its possession under section 9, specific relief act and to leave the question of mesne profits for another suit, as mesne profits would depend on title, a matter which cannot be gone into in a suit under section 9 of the specific relief ..... mad 328, a division bench of the madras high court took the view that a claim for mesne profits ought not to be made in a suit for possession under section 9 of the specific relief act (old) as the question of title cannot be directly decided in such a suit and, therefore, a relief which depends upon title, considered apart from possession, cannot be given in such a suit. ..... after all, remedy under section 6 of the specific relief act, 1963 is a special remedy providing speedy relief to a person who is thrown out of ..... , air 1971 goa 24, the learned judicial commissioner observed that the suit being under section 6 of the new specific relief act in which the question of title is not decided by the court, the lower court should not have entertained a claim ..... nuc 4854 (hp), the learned judicial commissioner of himachal pradesh also held that in a suit under section 9 of the specific relief act mesne profits or damages cannot be awarded and a separate suit for mesne profits would not be barred by the principles of ..... defendant has examined ugam singh a class iv servant of a school who has nothing to do with the case. .....

Surajmal and anr. Vs. Mangilal and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1978Raj22; 1977()WLN22

..... clissold and reiterated that even after expiry of the period mentioned in section 8 of the specific relief act, 1963, a suit based on possessory title was maintainable and in such a suit the plaintiff .need not prove his title, stating :-- 'it cannot be disputed that a person in possession of land in the assumed character of owner and exercising peaceably ..... learned counsel drew our attention to the long title of the limitation act 1963 which shows that it is an act to consolidate and amend the law for the limitation of suits, etc. ..... it was said that, 'whatever be the legal position under the 1908 act, the new act 1963 had completely changed that legal position' and that, 'the subsequent act of parliament was a 'parliamentary exposition of the law as it stood prior to the enactment of the 1963 act and. ..... the objects and reasons of the limitation act, 1963 no doubt states that, 'articles 142 and 144 of the limitation act, 1908 have given rise to a good deal of confusion with respects to suits for possession by owners of property'. ..... when section 31(b) of the limitation act, 1963 expressly states that nothing in the act shall apply to pending suits, we fail to see how articles 64 and 65 of that act can be called in aid to the construction of article 142 of the limitation act. ..... alexander, air 1968 sc 1165, expressing that articles 64 and 65 of the limitation act, 1963 were not remedial but declaratory of law. .....

Smt. Shakuntla Devi Vs. Mohanlal Amrit Raj JaIn Market, Pali

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1994Raj259

..... it is made perfectly clear by section 23 of the specific relief act, 1963 that the court has to determine onthe facts and circumstances of each case before it whether specific performance of a contract to convey a property ought to be granted, or it should be ..... arose in the present case, on account of failure on the part of the defendant-appellant in the matter of performance on her part of contract, inasmuch as, she did not move an application under section 230a of the income-tax act, 1961 to obtain a clearance certificate and unless the clearance certificate is obtained by her, the question of payment of balance of price did not arise.16. ..... again due to inability shown by the defendant-appellant herself not able to obtain the income-tax clearance certificate under section 230a of the income-tax act, 1961, the time for execution of the sale-deed which wasearlier extended from 30-5-78 was again extended up to 15-6-78. ..... does not by itself remove the strong presumption as contemplated under section 10 read with section 23 of the specific relief act, 1963. ..... the defendant-appellant deliberately avoided to move an application u/s.230a of the income-tax act, 1961 and now after such interval of about 16 years taking the defence that she entitled to pay ..... view of the aforementioned discussion, in my humble opinion, the net result is that presumption as contemplated in the explanation of section 12 of the old act corresponding to section 10 of the new specific relief act has not been rebutted. .....