Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: borstal school act 1963 Court: kerala Page 1 of about 694 results (0.060 seconds)

Feb 26 1982 (HC)

Viswanathan Nair Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 1982CriLJ1701

..... the reformatory process envisaged in the concept of a period of detention in the borstal school will not be effective unless after release from the borstal school the adolescent could find for himself a respectable berth in society. ..... one of us, the acting chief justice, on his visit to the borstal school on the 8th of january of this year was told by the inmates that there is scarcely any facility for such training intended to rehabilitate them. ..... we are mentioning this here only to alert the home department of the government to bestow kind and compassionate attention to the borstal school, as the government is in law bound to, particularly with a view to consider what rehabilitative training could be introduced in the borstal school at the earliest.2. ..... for the present we are concerned with what we should do to viswanathan nair, who is released from the borstal school yesterday and who is before us today. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 07 2014 (TRI)

The Principal, Sree Raghavendra College of Nursing Vs. Jasmine and Oth ...

Court : Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram

..... first opposite party, government vocational higher secondary school, thodupuzha represented by its principal in his version contended thus before the forum:- it is admitted that complainant completed the plus 2 course in the first opposite party institution during 2000-2002. ..... barkathali: president this is an appeal filed by the 3rd opposite party in cc.229/05 on the file of cdrf, idukki under section 15 of the consumer protection act challenging the order of the forum dated, july 30, 2012. 2. ..... the case of the complainant as testified by the complainant as pw1 and as detailed in the complaint before the forum in brief is this:- complainant joined in the 3rd opposite party institution, government vocational higher secondary school, thodupuzha for bsc nursing, after successfully completing plus 2 vhsc course from the government vocational higher secondary school, thodupuzha. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 30 2014 (TRI)

Safila Beevi and Another Vs. A.M.Hospital, Rep. by Its Managing Direct ...

Court : Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram

..... section 6(1) of limitation act, 1963 provides thus:- where a person entitled to institute a suit or make an application for the execution of a decree is, at the time from which the prescribed period is to be reckoned, a minor or insane, or an idiot, he may institute the suit or make the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 19 1970 (HC)

Achuthan Pillai and ors. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1972Ker39

..... and examine the record of the commissioner or any deputy or assistant commissioner, of any area committee or of any trustee in respect of any proceeding, not being a proceeding in respect of which a suit or an appeal to a court is provided by this act, to satisfy themselves as to the regularity of such proceeding or the correctness, legality or propriety of any decision or order passed therein; and, if, in any case, it appears to the government that any such decision or order should be modified, annulled, reversed ..... was published in the gazette, and so the government was aware of the order in 1961, that in the disciplinary proceedings taken against the commissioner in 1963 he was charged among other things with sanctioning leases, including the one in question, without complying with the provisions of section 29 and the relevant rules framed under the act; and so the government was fully aware of the infirmities, if any, in the order sanctioning the lease ..... article 94 of the limitation act 1963 which provides for a period of 12 years to set aside a transfer of immovable property comprised in any hindu religious or charitable endowment made by the manager for valid consideration, should, furnish the criterion as to what is the ..... section 10 of the limitation act, 1963 provides no period of limitation for a suit against a person in whom the trust property has become vested for any specific purpose or against his legal representatives or assigns for the purpose of following in his or .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 26 1982 (HC)

Raman Pillai Thankappan Pillai Vs. Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1982Ker350

..... however in discussing the scope of article 137 and certain sections of the limitation act the supreme court observed in para 3 :'further section 4 of the limitation act, 1963, provides for the contingency when the prescribed period for any application expires on a holiday and the only contingency contemplated is 'when the court is closed' ..... with respect, we find it unable to agree with the observation in the referring order that this decision had expressed the view that the limitation act was applicable to proceedings before tribunals or other authorities and thus upheld the view expressed by the high courts of guj-rat and bombay in ilr (1968) guj 348 and air 1975 bom 297 ..... with respect we do not agree with the learned judge in the order of reference that air 1976 sc 2161 held that the limitation act was applicable to proceedings before tribunals or other authorities and thus it upheld the view in ilr (1968) guj 348 and air 1975 bom ..... amina kunhi umma, 1973 ker lt 138 : (air 1974 ker 162) (fb) the majority judgment ruled that the limitation act applies only to courts and prescribes period of limitation in respect of suits, appeals and applications filed only in courts and that even if the power under section 5 were to be read info a special or local law by reason of section ..... 1.20 acres of land with the buildings therein of which the petitioner was the owner was acquired by the state for widening the road from the girls high school junction to the civil station, quilon. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 14 2006 (HC)

Gopalakrishnan Vs. Rajamma

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2006(4)KLT377

..... gift may also be revoked in any of the cases (save want or failure of consideration) in which, if it were a contract, it might be rescinded.save as aforesaid, a gift cannot be revoked.this act of revocation of ext.a-3 settlement deed in the present case is claimed to have been exercised by the mother, not by approaching the civil court on the ground of fraud and misrepresentation, but by executing ext.a-4 ..... the present suit filed long after the expiry of the 3 years' period prescribed under article 59 of the limitation act, 1963 was hopelessly time-barred. ..... present suit fails to establish that the decrees in the previous two suits were secured by fraud or collusion as envisaged by section 44 of the evidence act, then it will be impermissible for the court in the present suit to consider the merits of the respective claims in the previous suits. ..... the said provision reads as follows:defacto guardian not to deal with minor's property-after the commencement of this act, no person shall be entitled to dispose of, ordeal with, the property of a hindu minor merely on the ground of his or her being the de facto guardian of the minor.it is only the minor's ..... hence, the first aspect to be considered is as to whether it is open to a donor after having executed a gift deed which was acted upon by the donees, to execute another gift deed cancelling the earlier gift deed on the ground of fraud and misrepresentation and altering the allotment ..... employed as a teacher in a high school at alappuzha. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 29 1989 (HC)

J.B. Enterprises Vs. State of Kerala and anr.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1990Ker65

..... as the application was by the party under section 14 of the arbitration act, the supreme court held that article 178 of the limitation act, 1908 (corresponding to article 119(a) of the 1963 act) is applicable and that the application is barred by limitation. ..... but, as pointed out in champalal's case, air 1960 sc 629, there is no period of limitation prescribed for an arbitrator to file an award in court by himself, and article 119 of the limitation act will apply only to applications filed by any of the parties for a direction to the arbitrator to file the award in court. ..... hand, government pleader contended that the arbitrator has to file the award or the party has to file an application compelling him to file the award within the period contemplated under article 119(a) of the limitation act and as that having not been done within the prescribed time, no decree can be passed in terms of the award. ..... corresponding article in the limitation act, 1963 is article 119 where the words are similar to the words of article 178 of the limitation act, 1908. ..... 110):'if the arbitrator himself files the award in the court, article 178 of the limitation act, 1908 is not applicable as the said article has been held to be applicable only where a party applies and not to the filing of the award by the arbitrator -- see champalal v. ..... the revision petitioner entered into a contract with the state for the work of 'construction of a building for government high school, ollur' on 26-2-1977. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 23 1979 (HC)

State of Kerala and anr. Vs. Ayilammal Syamala Thamburatti and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1980Ker82

..... apply in respect of so much extent of land comprised in private forests held by an owner under his personal cultivation as is within the ceiling limit applicable to him under the kerala land reforms act, 1963 (1 of 1964) or any building or structure standing thereon or appurtenant thereto: explanation:-- for the purposes of this sub-section, 'cultivation' includes cultivation of trees or plants of any species. ..... entitled to exclude the time requisite for obtaining a copy of the order (decision) of the tribunal appealed from under section 12(2) of the limitation act, 1963, and the time requisite for obtaining a copy of the judgment (statement of reasons given by the tribunal) on which its order is founded under ..... according to the learned counsel for the respondents, the decision under section 8 of the act, though captioned an 'order', is neither a 'decree' nor an 'order' as envisaged in the expression, 'copy of the decree or order appealed from or sought to be revised or reviewed' in sub-sections (2) and (3) of section 12 of the limitation act, 1963, in so far as according to him, the said decision is not a 'decree' or 'order' as defined in sub-sections (2) and ..... in the light of the above discussion it has to be held, and we hold, that sections 4 - 24 (inclusive) of the limitation act, 1963, shall, to the extent to which these provisions have not been expressly excluded by a special or local law, apply for the purpose of determining any period of limitation prescribed for any suit, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 06 1981 (HC)

Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax Vs. Thalayar Rubber Industries ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : [1981]131ITR162(Ker)

..... presented to bodies, other than courts, are now to be governed for purposes of limitation by article 137......under the old limitation act, no doubt(the long title was 'an-act to consolidate and amend the law for the limitation of suits and for other purposes', while, in the new act of 1963, the long title is 'an act to consolidate and amend the law for the limitation of suits and other proceedings and for purposes connected therewith '. ..... the first ground was that in spite of the changes 'made in the indian limitation act, 1963, no drastic change was intended in the scope of article 137 so as to include within it all applications irrespective of the fact whether they had any reference to the code of civil procedure ..... the conclusion would, therefore, follow that the provisions of section 12(2) of the limitation act of 1963, can be relied upon in computing the period of limitation prescribed for filing a revision petition under section 10 of ..... and plants [1975] 35 stc 413 (sc), the question was whether section 14(2) of the limitation act, 1963, can be invoked for excluding the time spent in prosecuting an application under r. ..... the contention that section 5 applies by virtue of the provisions of section 29(2) of the limitation act, 1963, the majority judgment of the full bench stated as follows (p. ..... of india, air 1970 sc 209, the supreme court observed that from sections 4 and 5 of the limitation act, 1963, it was clear that the limitation act deals only with applications to courts. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 1971 (HC)

Kali Pennamma Vs. St. Paul's Convent in Palluruthy Vadakkummuri

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1972Ker185

..... in 1967 ker lt 395 = (air 1967 ker 259), before an alleged custom can receive the recognition of the court and so acquire legal force, there must be satisfactory proof of usage, so long and invariably acted upon in practice as to show that it has, by common consent, been submitted to as the established governing rule of the particular family, class, district or country; and the course of practice upon which the custom ..... was also contended that the plaintiff can succeed only if it is established that the first defendant has a homestead or sufficient extent of land as mentioned in section 2 (25) of the kerala land reforms act, and that, for that purpose, it was not enough if it establishes that the first defendant's husband died leaving property, but it must also satisfy the court as to what is the law under ..... section 75 of the kerala land reforms act, 1963, that gives protection to a kudikidappukaran ..... stated:'it is well settled by a series of decisions of the cochin high court that before the enactment of the cochin thiyya act, the makkathayam thiyyas (commonly known in the state as ezhavas) were governed by custom or usage and not by the strict ..... is whether by virtue of the fact that she succeeded to a half share in her husband's property, she would cease to be a kudikidappukari as defined in section 2 (25) of the kerala land reforms act, 1963. ..... entitled to eviction, if the first defendant is a 'kudikidappukaran' as defined in section 2 (25) of the kerala land reforms act, 1963. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //