Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: border security force act 1968 section 99 lunacy of accused Page 89 of about 6,981 results (0.279 seconds)

State of West Bengal and ors. Vs. Jiban Krishna Das and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2002SC2048; (2002)3CALLT71(SC); [2002(95)FLR527]; JT2002(4)SC420; 2002LabIC1705; (2002)IIILLJ266SC; 2002(4)SCALE211; (2002)4SCC721; [2002]3SCR542

..... , it is difficult to hold that the respondents who had been enrolled as volunteers under the west bengal national volunteer force act, belong to the class of constable, under the west bengal police force and to treat them separately in matters of fixation of scale of pay, amounts to violating article 14 of the constitution ..... in 1949. the volunteer force was known as 'west bengal national volunteer force'. section 4 of the act says that a volunteer, when called upon for duty, shall discharge such functions in relation to the protection of persons, the security of property and the preservation of ..... of the border districts and also to give training to some citizens in the use of fire-arms so that their services could be used during the period of an emergency, a national volunteer force was constituted in west bengal. for that purpose, the west bengal national volunteer act, 1949 (for short 'the act') was enacted .....

K.A. Kannappa Chetti Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1973)2MLJ212

..... (2) (gg) of the defence of india rules, 1962, came up for interpretation. there, routes on border areas were taken over for operation by government buses in the interest of the security under the defence of india act by cancelling the permits of private operators under the impugned rules. its validity was questioned, and wanchoo, j., ..... business and to the acquisition, holding and disposal of property. the present article 298 replaced the original article 298 by the constitution (seventh amendment) act, 1956. the amendment came into force on 1st november, 1956. the object of the amendment is stated as fellows : -to make it clear that the union government as well as ..... operating in the particular state where such legislation is sought to be introduced and operators outside that state and consequently, article 14 is infringed. there is considerable force in this contention. obviously, if such law is made by the centre, the restrictions imposed by such law on bus operators in the state to which .....

Prithipal Singh Etc. Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2011(4)KLT129(SN); 2012(1)SCC10; 2012(1)SCC(Cr)1; AIR2012SCW594; AIR2012SC1594

..... paramjit kaur.33. this court in its order dated 28.8.1996 took note of the fact that the witnesses had been provided protection/security of central reserve police force/border security force and counsel appearing for the state assured the court to grant necessary sanction under section 197 cr.p.c., if so required for the prosecution ..... his special knowledge regarding such facts, failed to offer any explanation which might drive the court to draw a different inference. section 106 of the evidence act is designed to meet certain exceptional cases, in which, it would be impossible for the prosecution to establish certain facts which are particularly within the knowledge ..... been condemned by the courts in this country. in its 113th report, the law commission of india recommended the amendment to the indian evidence act, 1872 (hereinafter called "evidence act"), to provide that in case of custodial injuries, if there is evidence, the court may presume that injury was caused by the police having .....

Union of India and Others Vs. Vijay Mam and Others

Court : Delhi

..... and their properties destroyed for the message to permeate. it was in these conditions when the safety and security of these respondents and their families was in great jeopardy in kashmir, that the government/appellant decided to ..... violations of human rights or natural or human made disasters, and who have not crossed an internationally recognized state border. 40. so far as housing of idps is concerned, these guidelines contain the following important provisions:- principle 3 ..... specific needs of internally displaced persons worldwide and identify rights and guarantees relevant to the protection of persons from forced displacement and to their protection and assistance during displacement as well as during return or resettlement and reintegration. ..... unauthorized and illegal, it was permissible for the estate officer to initiate action under the provisions of the pp act. the estate officer had passed the eviction order after following the due procedure, recording specific finding that they .....

Goldman Sachs Investments Vs. the Adjudicating Officer,

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Reported in : (2008)BusLR611NULL

..... the circular dated august 8, 2003 and regulation 13 (1) of the regulations and, therefore, initiated adjudication proceedings under chapter via of the securities and exchange board of india act, 1992 (hereinafter called the act). the adjudicating officer served a notice dated june 6, 2006 calling upon the appellant to show cause why penalty be not imposed in terms of ..... with such persons. this requirement of an undertaking appears to us to be opposed to all norms of reason and is totally devoid of logic. in fact, it borders on absurdity and is arbitrary. when the fiis and their subaccounts have not been debarred from dealing in odis with indian residents/ nris/ pios/ocbs and many of ..... principles of natural justice. it is after all an approved rule of fair play. the concept has gained significance and shades with time. these observations apply with full force to the facts of our case. in view of what we have said above, we have no hesitation in holding that the show cause notice is not only .....

Steamship Company Vs. Joliffe

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the laws of either of the states," no other legislation on the subject was had until the 30th of august, 1852. an act was then passed entitled "an act to amend an act entitled 'an act to provide for the better security of the lives of passengers on board of vessels, propelled in whole or in part by steam, and for other purposes.' ..... we see a system of pilotage as complete, or more so, than any which had previously existed, and, in my judgment, one more judicious, and better calculated to secure safety of life and property than the one provided by the california statute. if, then, the principle be a sound one that when congress has provided such a system, ..... from the earliest period of the government. on the formation of the union there were laws in force in the different states bordering on the sea for the regulation of pilots and pilotage, and at its first session, in 1789, congress passed an act adopting the existing regulations and page 69 u. s. 460 such as might be provided by .....

Scott Vs. Donald

Court : US Supreme Court

..... three thousand dollars, with good and sufficient sureties, conditioned that he will well and truly obey the laws of the state of south carolina, now or hereafter in force, in relation to the sale of intoxicating liquors, that he will pay all fines, penalties, damages and costs that he may be assessed or recorded against him ..... is a monopoly of the federal government. lowenstein v. evans, 69 f. 908. the only objections to the dispensary law which strike me as being of any force are the provisions of the fifteenth and twenty-third sections, requiring the state commissioner to purchase his supplies from the brewers and distillers in the state. but even this ..... , and no others except such as are authorized by special act of the general assembly, provided, however, that any county, town, or city wherein the sale of alcoholic liquors was prohibited by law prior to july 1, 1893, may secure the establishment of a dispensary within its borders in the following manner: upon petition signed by one-fourth .....

Stephens Vs. Cherokee Nation

Court : US Supreme Court

..... in said districts to said appellate court, in criminal cases, shall be prosecuted under the provisions of chapter forty-six of said mansfield's digest, by this act put in force in the indian territory. but no one of said judges shall sit in said appellate court in the determination of any cause in which an appeal is ..... nation should at no future time, without their consent, be included within the territorial limits or jurisdiction of any state or territory, and that the government would secure to that nation "the right by their national councils to make and carry into effect all such laws as they may deem necessary for the government of the persons ..... of the united states government toward the people, indian citizens and united states citizens, residing in this territory under governments which it has itself erected within its own borders?" "no one conversant with the situation can doubt that it is impossible of continuance. it is of a nature that inevitably grows worse, and has in itself .....

Swiss National Ins. Co., Ltd. Vs. Miller

Court : US Supreme Court

..... of the district which dismissed the appellant's bill against the alien property custodian and the treasurer of the united states to recover securities seized and held under the trading with the enemy act. mr. chief justice taft delivered the opinion of the court. this is an appeal from the court of appeals of the ..... the serbs, croats and slovenes, and that for this government to retain the property of persons who are citizens of those countries and resident within their borders would have a prejudicial effect upon the relations between the countries in question and the united states. the secretary of state's recommendation was that any amendment ..... gave right of recovery to subjects page 267 u. s. 61 of associated nations whose property had been sequestered solely because of residence within territory occupied by enemy forces -- e.g., belgium and northern france. there were several hundred cases of french and belgium property taken solely because the owners were in such occupied territory. .....

Morrison Vs. National Australia Bank Ltd.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... be fraud (abroad): a proposal for a new u. s. jurisprudence with regard to the extraterritorial application of the anti-fraud provisions of the 1933 and 1934 securities acts, 28 law & pol y int l bus. 477, 492 493 (1997). the criticisms seem to us justified. the results of judicial-speculation-made-law divining ..... , j., joined by scalia and kennedy, jj., dissenting) (presumption against extraterritoriality lend[s] no support to a rule restricting a federal statute from reaching conduct within u. s. borders ); continental ore co. v. union carbide & carbon corp. , 370 u. s. 690 , 705 (1962) (presumption against extraterritoriality not controlling [s]ince the activities of ..... s as it is now, that the presumption against extraterritoriality does not apply when the conduct [at issue] occurs within the united states, and has lesser force when the failure to extend the scope of the statute to a foreign setting will result in adverse effects within the united states. environmental defense fund, inc. .....