Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: border security force act 1968 section 88 judicial notice Court: mumbai Page 4 of about 1,676 results (0.108 seconds)

Sir Dolatsingji Jaswantsingji Vs. Oghad Vira Khachar

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1924Bom72; (1923)25BOMLR726

..... its interesting character. but in fact its investigation has led us to explore the somewhat misty history of the border-lands of kathiawar in those pre-british days when might was right, and no man's life or property was secure. jama or tribute used then to be collected by the annual excursions of armed bands led by one who ..... government could be proved by the kathi defendants if once walker's settlement was out of the way. they were no direct parties to that settlement. whether if government forced them to pay, they would have any right of indemnity against the thakore sahib under the provisions of a presumed lost grant in 1777 or 1781 i need not discuss ..... a gameti who has lost all or most of his lordships. these estates being very small the holder was not included in the definition of talukdar until the amending act (bombay act ii of 1905) recognized as a talukdar a mulgameti who holds lands directly from government.64. the plaintiff's contention in the lower court was-(1) that the kathi .....

Binod Rao Vs. Minocher Rustom Masani

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1976)78BOMLR125

..... that was a case in which, a habeas corpus petition was filed challenging- the orders of detention passed under section 3(1)(c) of the maintenance of internal security act, 1971. the kerala high court held that once a common law right was enshrined in the constitution as a fundamental right, it became merged in the relevant article ..... , however, find the description of the said item as an attempt to threaten the economic stability of india to be so fanciful and far-fetched as to border on the farcical. mr. advani also submitted that the publication of this item would undermine the public confidence in the national credit and in government loans and that ..... proclamations of emergency are in force. by the defence of india ordinance, 1975 (ordinance no. 5 of 1975) promulgated by the president on june 30, 1975, the defence of india act, 1971, was amended. by the said ordinance the title of the said act was: changed to 'the defence and internal security of india act, 1971', and certain sections .....

Maharashtra State Electricity Board Vs. Datar Switchgear Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2003(2)BomCR81

..... order as stringent as a stay of the arbitral proceedings, the court in the exercise of its power under section 9 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 can impose such sanctions to secure due compliance with an order of the arbitral tribunal. this power must, however, in my view, be wielded with extreme caution and circumspection. ..... a different forum of adjudication with less cumbersome procedure, delay and expense and not to abandon all or any of its substantive rights under the various laws in force, according to which only even the arbitrator is obliged to adjudicate the claims referred to him. as long as there is nothing in the arbitration agreement to ..... arbitral tribunal. a willful disregard of the order of the tribunal must be shown to exist, bordering on contumacious behaviour.52. the question as to whether a provision which is analogous to section 9 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 would include the power to grant a stay of the arbitral proceeding, came up for .....

Emperor Vs. Bashan Madar Korbu

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1948)50BOMLR290

..... 2, 1947, he was removed to yeravda central prison. about december 8, 1947, a copy of the notice of the grounds of detention under section 3 of the public security measures act dated november 25, 1947, was served upon him. the notice, after setting out the grounds for detention, stated that he had a right to make a representation to/ ..... notice served upon him under section 3 have nothing to do with the sholapur city. the grounds mentioned in that notice are:your village is the last village of the border of this district. your movements have been very suspicious. your activities these days have been prejudicial to the public peace, safety and convenience of this district.4. so ..... the district magistrate, provided the circumstances justify it, shall make an order directing that he be detained. but section 2(4) provides that 'so long as there is in force in respect of any person an order under clause (a) of sub-section (1), he shall be liable to be removed to, and detained in, such place and under .....

Deepak Sadashiv Nikalje Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR2003Bom255; 2003(2)ALLMR187; 2003(1)BomCR481; (2003)1BOMLR371; 2003(2)MhLj44

..... to such person when demanded unless the passport authority is of the opinion that it will not be in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of india, the security of india, friendly relations of india with any foreign country or in the interests of the general public to furnish such copy. the regional passport officer has recorded ..... remanding the matter back to regional passport officer for consideration of the petitioner's application for issuance of passport facility. the authorities appear to us have failed to act in unbiased manner in considering the petitioner's application for issuance of passport facility in accordance and due conformity with law. remitting the matter again to the same ..... his good conduct. there is absolutely nothing placed before us that during the period the bond of rs. 25000/- was in force for the period from 5-1-1995 to 4-1-1997 the petitioner misconducted or acted in breach of the terms of the bond. as a matter of fact, it is not in dispute before us that .....

Wall Street Finance Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Prev.)

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2000)(69)ECC109

..... specifically for the offences relating to smuggling for foreign currency and traveller cheques. the commissioner ordered confiscation of rs. 23 lakhs which was (sic) possession of wsfl as security amount as also the amounts which were in trans from ttc to them via banking channels. the amounts are claimed by wsfl as the legitimate dues from ttc. even ..... .4(b). m/s ttc was a partnership firm with two partners viz. riyaz retiwala and savio fernandes. in his various statements, riyaz retiwala stated that he had securities and fixed deposits totally amounting to rs. 55.5 lakhs with m/s wsfl for getting the asf tcs for sale. these deposits were in his personal name and ..... remedy, and to suppress subtle inventions and evasions for continuance of the mischief, and pro privato commodo, and to add force and life to the cure and remedy according to the true intent of the makers of the act, pro bono publico.46. as i have brought out above, before the introduction of sections 120 and 121 the mischief .....

Sir Dinshaw Manockji Petit and ors. Vs. Sir Jamsetji Jeejeebhoy and or ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2Ind.Cas.701

..... of the indian zoroastrians, because that is the ground upon which i have, after long and anxious reflection, felt that our common decision can be most securely founded. while theoretically adhering to their ancient religion and consistently avowing its principal tenets- including, of course the merit of conversion as the theological dogma, they ..... intended to regulate procedure, and that it never applied to this country at any time; but even if it did, i hold that the evidence act, when it came into force, entirely superseded it. the legislature, however, without waiting, and. in order to avoid complications-on the assumption that this view was correct-repealed ..... was a converted zoroastrian. and the equal solemnity with which some of the learned witnesses asserted and others contradicted the suggestion that akbar was a zoroastrian bordered on the ridiculous. mr. behramgore tehmurus anklesaria gravely told the court that, from his researches, he had come to the conclusion that at a certain .....

Indian Petro Chemicals Corporation Limited Vs. Air India Limited and O ...

Court : Mumbai

..... notice dated 10th/14th february 1995 did not contain a whisper regarding security. the said notice was replied to by the petitioners and no further proceedings took place before the estate officer, except for another show cause notice which was ..... director, legal and administration, as estate officer issued a notice dated 3rd november 1995 under section 4 of the ppe act. in the said notice the estate officer rightly did not mention any ground of security as the basis on which he had formed the opinion that the petitioners should be evicted from the premises as the termination ..... of publication of this order and in the event of their refusal or failure to comply therewith, they were liable to be evicted by use of force. 12] the petitioners being aggrieved and dissatisfied with this order, preferred appeal no.261 of 2001 invoking jurisdiction of the appellate authority under section 9 of the .....

Ashok Thapper Vs. Saral Enterprises and ors. and Saral Enterprises and ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2001(2)BomCR61; (2001)2BOMLR57; 2001(2)MhLj795

..... agreement with the said judgment of the learned judge of the orissa high court. in our case, by consent the defendants had agreed to give their own flat as security in case, they fail to make payment of the decretal amount. the circumstances mentioned in the consent terms are clear enough that if the defendants fail to make ..... and nothing more. 10. i am not at all impressed by this submission as there is nothing on record to show that there were any compulsive circumstances or coercive forces which led the defendants to sign the consent terms. there is not even a whisper on record anywhere. it is to the contrary that the defendants have further ..... registration before it could be put for execution. if the parties by consent indicate or mention some immovable properties as security for the decretal amount, such a decree, according to me, would not require registration under section 17 of the act. shri mehta also cited a division bench of the madras high court in the case of m. pappu reddiar .....

Shivlal Khubchand Vs. Apaji Bhivrav and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1878)ILR2Bom654

..... under section 338 of act viii of 1859.12. but there is a case in all fours with ..... and another 10 bom. h.c. rep. 1 was cited, but it cannot be considered to govern the present case; for in narayan dev v. gajanand dikshit the security bond had been executed under section 36 of act xxiii of 1861, and in giving judgment in that case the court pointed out that there was 'a marked distinction between' a ..... security bond executed under section 36 of act xxiii of 1861 and a security bond executed under section 338 of act viii of 1859. the security bond in the present case was executed .....