Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: border security force act 1968 section 50 combination of punishments Sorted by: recent Page 6 of about 1,715 results (0.176 seconds)

Nov 13 2019 (SC)

Rojer Mathew Vs. South Indian Bank Ltd and Ors Chief Manager

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... of india act 2008 xiv. the competition act 2002 xv. the companies act 2013 xvi. the cinematograph act 1952 xvii. the income tax act 1961 xviii. the customs act 1962 xix. the administrative tribunals act 1985 xx. the consumer protection act 1986 xxi. the securities and exchange board of india act 1992 xxii. the recovery of debts due to banks and financial institutions act 1993 xxiii. the armed forces tribunal act 2007 xxiv ..... . the national green tribunal act 2010 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 21 2019 (HC)

S. S. Rana vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... to the... petitioner on 27th october, 1990.13. on 31st january, 1994, the... petitioner was issued a charge-sheet under section 30 (b) of the border security force act, 1968 ( bsf act ) alleging that while performing the duties of quarter master on 27th october, 1990, he conspired with hc topno to sell 30 quintals of sugar in the agartala ..... from service to the... petitioner. these proceedings were again sent to the ig for confirmation in accordance with rule 106 of the border security force rules, 1969 ( bsf rules ), read with section 108 of the bsf act. on 4th may, 1995 the ig withheld confirmation and transmitted the proceedings to the superior authority. on 31st may, 1995, the ..... of compulsory retirement.2. the background facts are that the... petitioner was, in the year 1990, working as a quarter master of the 123rd battalion of the border security force ( bsf ) having been entrusted that duty by the commandant of the wp (c) 1881/1996 page 1 of 22 said battalion. the duties of the... .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 10 2019 (HC)

Vijay vs.state

Court : Delhi

..... to be mitigating circumstances for not awarding the maximum sentence and accordingly appellant was convicted for the minimum prescribed sentence of 7 years for the offence under section 4 pocso act.28. in view of the above, i find no merit in the appeal. the appeal is accordingly dismissed.29. order dasti under signatures of the court master. ..... the trial court in holding that the prosecution has proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant had committed the offence under section 377 ipc and section 4 of pocso act as also the offence under sectionipc. i find no infirmity in the judgment on conviction.26. it may further be noticed that the trial court in the order ..... on conviction dated 19.07.2018 and order on sentence dated 02.08.2018 whereby the appellant has been convicted for the offence punishable under section 4 pocso act as well as for the offences punishable under sections 367/377/506 ipc and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 7 years under section 4 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 30 2019 (HC)

Jawahar T and Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... in w.p.(c) no.6680/2017 (tanaka ram v. union of india), which was in the context of the employees of the border security force, which was upheld by the supreme court by dismissal of the slp (c) no.252(union of india v. tanaka ram) on ..... (c) no.11(patil gopal babulal v. union of india), which was in the context of persons working with the indo tibetan border police (itbp).6. it requires to be noticed at the outset that at the time when advertisement no.1/2002 was issued, ..... of pension, gratuity, leave travel allowance etc., whatever was applicable to central government employees would be made applicable to members of the force, which includes the gref.7. it has been explained by this court in its judgment dated 27th march, 2017 in w.p.(c ..... fact has been confirmed in a response dated 15th november, 2010 from the general reserve engineer force ( gref ) centre at pune to one of the... petitioners, pursuant to an application under the rti act, 2005. w.p.(c) 3671/2019 page 1 of 4 3. at the outset .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 2019 (HC)

Ex-Constable Subhash Singh vs.government of India & Anr

Court : Delhi

..... commandant (oc) of the 95th battalion, bsf holding the... petitioner guilty of the charges for which he was tried by the summary security force court (ssfc) of the offences under sections 19 (a) and 22 (e) of the border security force act, 1968 (bsf act) and sentencing him to be dismissed from service. he has also challenged the order dated 13th december, 2004 passed by the deputy ..... and sentencing him accordingly.22. section 22(e) of the bsf act reads as under: 22 insubordination and obstruction- any person subject to this act who commits any of the following offences, that is to say- .... (e) neglects to obey any general, local or other order; shall, on conviction by a security force court, be liable to suffer imprisonment for a term which may .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 20 2019 (SC)

secretary,govt.of India . Vs. Dharambir Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... operationally oriented mine field or lifting or negotiating mine field laid by the enemy or own forces in operational areas near international borders or the line of control. (vi) war like situations, including cases which are attributable to/aggravated by:- (1) extremist acts, exploding mines etc, while on way to an operational area (2) battle demonstration with ..... . regulation 173 of the pension regulations for the army, 1961, 8 reads as under: 173. the grant of pensionary awards to personnel of the defence security corps shall be governed by the same regulations as are applicable to personnel below officer rank of the army, except where they are inconsistent with the provisions ..... duty at the relevant time. this benefit will be given more liberally to the claimant in cases occurring on active service as defined in the army/navy/air force act. 13. in respect of accidents or injuries, the following rules shall be observed:- (a) (b) injuries sustained when the man is on duty as defined .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 27 2019 (SC)

Bobindra Kumar Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the said standing order. it is also contended that judgment in rohitash kumar relied upon by the high court was in respect of seniority of assistant commandants in the border security force where the rule itself contemplates that in case of direct entrant, the date of appointment shall be the date of commencement of their training course. therefore, the ..... read the statement contained in the recruitment roll set out in the schedule in terms of section 5 of the act. the expression member of the force is defined in section 2(d) of the central reserve police force act, 19496 and also rule 6 of the rules. rule 6 contemplates that all the officers and men mentioned in ..... 5 does not restrict its scope and applicability only to the constables and to the persons appointed by the commandant. in terms of section 2(d) of the act, it includes a person who has been appointed by the commandant and also a person appointed by the central government. still further, rule 6 contemplates that all officers .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 20 2019 (SC)

Tilak Raj Bakshi Vs. Avinash Chand Sharma(dead) Through Lrs.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... in such instalments and at such rate of interest as may be prescribed. (3) notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, until the entire consideration money together with interest or any other amount, if any, due to the central government on account of the transfer of any site ..... of sites and building rules, 1960 provides that no fragmentation of any site is permitted. subsequently, in exercise of powers under sections 3 and 22 of the act, chandigarh estate rules, 2007 came to be made. rule 16 deals with fragmentation/amalgamation, which reads as follows: 16. fragmentation/amalgamation. no fragmentation or amalgamation ..... by brothers for sale?. f. what is the effect of the prohibition against fragmentation of property in question under the capital of punjab (development and regulation) act, 1952?. 13 findings whether there was a family settlement?.17. as far as the first question is concerned, whether there was a family settlement, at paragraph .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 05 2019 (HC)

Mohar Singh vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... petition with the prayer to issue writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, quashing the order dated 21.02.2018 passed by the director general border security force.3. the relevant facts of the case are that no.970077512 ex-ct (now ex-hc) mohar singh of 200 bn bsf, the petitioner alongwith const. sunil ..... that : by now it is a well established principle of law that the high court exercising power of judicial review under article 226 of the constitution does not act as an appellate authority. is circumscribed and confined to correct errors of law or procedural error if any resulting in manifest miscarriage of justice or violation of principles ..... the appeal was allowed with the directions to the department to consider and dispose of the statutory appeal filed by the petitioner u/s 117(2) of bsf act, 1968 within 04 weeks by passing a reasoned order which was to be communicated to the petitioner forthwith.8. thereafter the petitioner submitted a statutory petition dated 08 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 30 2019 (HC)

Fayaz Khan vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... against him was mala fide, there is no specific averment made against any particular officer of the army, who is claimed to have acted mala fide against the petitioner or his father.9. pertinently, the armed forces tribunal did express any opinion on the factual aspects, and its decision was premised on purely technical question whether the chief of the ..... behalf of the respondents submits that merely because the action taken against the petitioner u/s 70 of the army act was held to be illegal and not warranted in the facts of the case, and the armed forces tribunal held that the petitioner should have been tried under a court martial and by resort to section 69 of ..... the army act, it does not follow that the petitioner is entitled to claim compensation. he submits that if this proposition is .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //