Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: border security force act 1968 section 50 combination of punishments Page 13 of about 1,715 results (0.325 seconds)

Mahavir Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 96(2002)DLT23; 2002(62)DRJ875

..... by the order passed by respondent no. 2, director general of border security force (for short 'bsf'), dismissing the statutory petition filed by the petitioner against his conviction and sentence passed by the summary security force court (for short 'ssfc') under the boarder security force act, 1968.2. brief facts which are necessary to dispose of this ..... sub inspector suresh chand proceeded for border on 7.10.1995. he came back on 9.10.1995 and was summoned by his superior assistant commandant m.a. sayeed and he asked him to give a written complaint regarding the incident. the summary security force court trial was held and the petitioner ..... is allowed and the order passed by respondent no. 2 rejecting the petitioner's statutory complaint is accordingly set aside. the proceedings of the summary security force court, the conviction and sentence awarded to the petitioner and set aside. the petitioner is consequently entitled to reinstatement in service with all consequential benefits .....

V.S. Hamsa Vs. Director General, Border Security Force and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 1997CriLJ878

..... was released by the b.s.f. officers. now, the contention advanced by the appellant is that he is no longer a member of the border security force and therefore any proceedings initiated under the b.s.f. act, 1968 are void and the appellant cannot be subjected to any such proceedings.2. the above argument is based on section 3 of the b ..... also the fir 53/95 of r.k. puram police station, new delhi on the ground that these proceedings are illegal and void. the appellant was a member of the border security force and he retired from that service on 31-10-93. according to respondents, in an enquiry conducted by the d.i.g. (hq) fhq it was found that the ..... offence triable by such court as well as by a security force court.the above section shows that if the trial has commenced within a period of six months proceedings could be taken against the persons who have retired from service. section 77 says that an offence under this act while subject to this act and if he had ceased to be so subject .....

Mahender Singh (Ex. Const) Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2008(104)DRJ749

..... pleading guilty and that he understands the nature of the charges. the tenor of what is recorded is almost verbatim of what is required as per rule 142 of the border security force rules, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the 'said rules'). rule 142 reads as under:142. general plea of 'guilty' or 'not guilty'.--(1) the accused person' ..... that it was si chattar singh and hc bala ram who had abused the petitioner and assaulted him. on a fresh charge sheet dated 30.5.2004, summary court force proceedings were held. on 7.6.2004, the petitioner is alleged to have pleaded 'guilt' to the first three out of the four charges while pleading 'not ..... aside and the director general, bsf was asked to consider afresh the statutory petition filed by the petitioner in terms of section 117 of the bsf act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the 'said act') and pass appropriate orders, the director general, bsf was also directed to examine the question of proportionality of sentence.7. the director general, bsf .....

Ex.-const. Driver Bhagirath Singh, S/O Sri Budhi Ram Vs. Union of Indi ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 122(2005)DLT134; 2005(83)DRJ37

..... . whether petitioner's dismissal from service for not taking food and water while undergoing rigorous imprisonment was disproportionate is the point for consideration in this petition.2. the petitioner joined border security force as constable on 1st march, 1990 at bsf, stc jodhpur. he was posted at shq bsf, siliguri with effect from 1st april, 1992. while posted at siliguri, petitioner received information ..... contended by them that the copy of charge sheet and record of evidence (roe) including exhibits were given to the petitioner on 2nd november, 1997. under section 40 of the act he could be awarded sentence up to seven years' imprisonment, but looking at the case, the commandant decided to dispose of by ssfc and in ssfc the imprisonment of one .....

N. Bommon Behram and anr. Vs. the Government of Mysore and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1970Kant89; AIR1970Mys89

..... to the writ petition. certain lands which are owned by the petitioners were notified for acquisition under section 4(1) of the act. the lands were required for the use of the border security force under the control of the central government. prior to the issue of this notification on 1-5-1967, there were certain ..... district. reference is made in this letter to the secretary having forwarded a semiofficial letter from sri p, e. rajagopal, deputy director (admn.) directorate general of border security force, new delhi. it has been stated by the secretary to the deputy commissioner that in view of what rajagopal has stated in his communication, the deputy commissioner ..... 5, 9, 11, 12 and 13 belonging to shri bomman behram and smt. mehra mehta of vaderapura village acquired for locating the viii battalion of the border security force. the breakup of the total award with reasons indicated against each of the items is as under.'then the communication indicates what in the opinion of the .....

Bachu Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2005(3)JKJ218

..... s.k. gupta, j.1. the petitioner was enrolled in border security force as constable (gd) on 22.06.1988. after the basic training, the petitioner was posted to 25 bn ..... he was dismissed from service. the order of dismissal was passed at tekanpur. according to mr. magoo, all the provisions of b.s.f. act and rules have been followed and full opportunity was afforded to the petitioner in observance of principle of natural justice.7. whereas, mrs. surinder kour ..... to the petitioner to rejoin the duty before passing the order of dismissal, in invoking the provisions of section 11(2) of the bsf act read with rule 22 of the bsf rules. it is further borne out from the record that the order of termination from service of ..... petitioner of being heard. the order of dismissal having been passed without enquiry and in violation of the provisions of the b.s.f. act and rules, deprived the petitioner of his valuable right of service. the petitioner further stated that the order of dismissal amounts to harsh .....

Nawaz-ul-haq Vs. State of J. and K. and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2000CriLJ420

..... during the month of march, 1993, he along with other militants, namely, hashooq nazaaz, nizam, javid bablu, habibullah and kaiser had attacked the personnel of border security force at paddar, tehsil bhaderwah. in the month of july, 1995, he along with his associates had fired the guns upon army and stf during cordon at ..... join mitancy but later on started giving food, clothing and shelter to the militants. because of mounting pressure of the security forces, the detenu in the month of august, 1995 surrendered before the border security force authorities and was released on the same day. instead of becoming a law abiding citizen, he joined another militants outfit ..... namely, 'harkat ansar' and one mashooq s/o ghulam mustafa r/o bhaderwah issued one pistol to him. then he started acting as a courier and messenger .....

Ex.Uttam Navik Dalbir Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

..... rule 149 of the bsf rules, 1969 or by the appellate authority under section 117(2) of the border security force act, 1968. in the said case, the supreme court had carefully examined the provisions of rule 149 of the border security force rules, 1969 and observed that since in rule 149, which specifically governs the procedure of ssfc, has ..... or evil consequences ensue by reason of an administrative order. in the said case it was further held that the summary security force court (ssfc) should have passed a speaking order while convicting the member of the force. 20. however, the decision of this court in the matter nirmal lakara (supra) had been over-ruled by ..... coast guard (discipline) rules, 1983. the charges framed against the petitioner were as under:- (i) first charge: under section 19 (a) of coast guard act, 1978:- using criminal force to his superior officer. in that he, did, on 30-0397, while on board cgs vajra, at about 1140 hours strike his superior officer assistant commandant pb .....

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Umesh Kumar Malik

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2006(4)Raj2805

..... conduct would have been different.7. the learned counsel for the appellant has pointed out that section 62 of the b.s.f. act is a procedure provided for declaring a person deserter from security force and then to suffer the consequence as a deserter. desertion from b.s.f. tentamounts to an offence. on the other hand to ..... misconduct if accorded with the aforesaid procedure does not suffer from the vice of non-enquiry or defective enquiry.14. it may further be noticed that the security force in itself enjoys different status and the rules have been framed under legislative mandate and not under proviso to article 309. the ordinary principle of natural justice ..... -rule (2) required that when after considering the reports on an officer's misconduct, the competent authority is satisfied that the trial of the officer by a security force court is inexpedient for impracticable, but is of the opinion, that further retention of the said officer in the service is undesirable, it shall inform him that .....

Hargovind Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... , 1968, (for brevity, 'the bsf act') to the confirming authority pointing out some irregularities in the proceeding before the gsf court and the illegality in the order ..... the petitioner then submitted a petition dated 20th july, 2000 under sub-section (2) of section 117 of the bsf act to the director general of border security force pointing out the irregularities in the proceedings before the gsf court as well as the illegality in the order of conviction. ..... security force court, (for short, 'gsf court'), found the petitioner guilty of civil offence of murder under section 302, indian penal code, and on december 7, 1999 imposed the sentence of imprisonment for life and dismissal from service on the petitioner. the petitioner submitted a petition dated 11th december, 1999 under sub-section (1) of section 117-of the border security force act .....