Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: border security force act 1968 section 26 intoxication Page 91 of about 36,936 results (0.250 seconds)

Hm Treasury Vs. Ahmed and Others

Court : UK Supreme Court

..... of state for defence (justice intervening) [2007] ukhl 58; [2008] 1 ac 332. the claimant in that case had been detained by british forces in iraq, acting pursuant to security council resolution 1546 made under article 42 of the charter. he claimed under the hra a declaration that his detention infringed his rights under article 5(1 ..... as appears necessary or expedient for enabling the effective application of "measures not involving the use of armed force" which the security council has decided "are to be employed to give effect to its decisions". measures to which the 1946 act refers must necessarily have a degree of specificity. they have to be capable of being "employed" ..... section 1 (1) of the united nations act 1946 (the 1946 act). section 1(1) is central to the appeals: "if, under article 41 of the charter of the united nations . . . (being the article which relates to measures not involving the use of armed force) the security council of the united nations call upon his majesty' .....

Rojer Mathew Vs. South Indian Bank Ltd and Ors Chief Manager

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... of india act 2008 xiv. the competition act 2002 xv. the companies act 2013 xvi. the cinematograph act 1952 xvii. the income tax act 1961 xviii. the customs act 1962 xix. the administrative tribunals act 1985 xx. the consumer protection act 1986 xxi. the securities and exchange board of india act 1992 xxii. the recovery of debts due to banks and financial institutions act 1993 xxiii. the armed forces tribunal act 2007 xxiv ..... . the national green tribunal act 2010 .....

State Of U.p. Vs. Anand Engineering College

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the close vicinity of the national chambal sanctuary project undertaken by the state government. that due to the effluent flowing out of the premises of the college that borders the sanctuary has resulted in serious threat to the ecology of the area as well as causing environmental damage and consequently has endangered the flora and fauna as ..... of the original writ petitioners that the authority passing the order imposing damages is not vested with any such power under any law for the time being in force. it was also the case on behalf of the original writ petitioners that the amount of damages imposed is too excessive without there being any statistical basis ..... the powers under section 33 of the wild life (protection) act, 1972. 65. on a fair reading of section 33 of the wild life (protection) act, 1972, reproduced hereinabove, the appropriate authority shall have wide powers to take such steps as well as to ensure the security of wild animals in the sanctuary and the preservation of the .....

Morrow Vs. Whitney

Court : US Supreme Court

..... error. the additional facts are stated in the opinion of the court. mr. justice field delivered the opinion of the court. the act of feb. 21, 1823, 3 stat. 724, after reviving and continuing in force certain previous acts for the adjustment of land claims in the territory of michigan, which them included wisconsin, provided, in its fifth section, that ..... always arises where their establishment rests in the uncertain recollection of witnesses as to an ancient possession. it would thus have proved to its possessor an instrument of quiet and security, but it would not have added any thing to the interest vested by the confirmation. ryan v. carter, 93 u. s. 78 . if, then, there was no ..... occur. gardapier might easily have been mistaken as to the length of his frontage on the river; but he could not well have been mistaken as to the land bordering on each side of his small tract, or as to whom it was confirmed. his tract was sufficiently identified by the boundaries named; and in such cases it .....

Arun Kumar Mukherjee Vs. Coal India Limited and Ors.

Court : Kolkata

..... advocate for the respondents responded to the submission of the petitioner on furnishing the wrong information at the time of employment by saying that if the employment is secured by adopting fraudulent practice giving incorrect and wrong information, it constitutes a serious misconduct as held by the supreme court in case of union of india & ..... for the purpose of ascertaining whether there was any delay on the part of the board in initiating disciplinary proceedings against the appellant has no merit and force. the stand now taken by the respondent in this court in the counter-affidavit is not convincing and is only an afterthought to give some explanation for ..... as 10.08.1961 at the time of seeking such employment. after such appointment, the service book was prepared, which includes form b prescribed in the mines act and rules and the particulars recorded therein should be verified by the employee and to certify that the information recorded therein are true and correct. admittedly, the .....

Jayappa Lokappa Narsinganawar Vs. Shivangouda Dyamangouda Patil

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1928Bom42; (1928)30BOMLR19

..... appellant surety jayappa to the first class subordinate judge's court at dharwar in suit no. 229 of 1917, requires registration under the indian registration act, and (2) whether this security bond can be enforced in the present darkhast either against the property thereby expressed to be mortgaged, or against the obligor personally or otherwise, ..... proceedings and incorporated therewith. it follows, therefore, i think that section 59 of the transfer of property act does not necessitate registration; for 'registered' is defined to mean 'registered under the law for the time being in force regulating the registration of documents'. further, sections 5, 58, and 100 contemplate a transaction between two persons ..... a case where the old code of civil procedure was in force when the suit began, but the new code of 1903 was in force when the application against the widow and sureties for the recovery of mesne profits was started. there also a security bond had been given to the court, but no person .....

Saudi Arabian Air Lines Vs. Ashok Margovind Panchal and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2003(2)BomCR357; [2003(96)FLR211]; 2002(1)MhLj745

..... to give after completion of 240 days continuous service. according to the respondent failure to make him as permanent security guard, after completion of 240 days continuous service, attracted item 9 of schedule iv of the act as the model standing orders which are admittedly applicable to the establishment of the petitioner. the respondent invoked item 4 ..... by the learned judge, to thepresent case, the conclusion is inescapable that the work continued and the postof security guard was of permanent nature and, therefore, there was noapplication of section 2(oo)(bb) of the i.d. act. even the learned single judge ofthe madras high court in the case of k. rajendran v. director ( ..... and permanent employment and to try to get the protection of section 2(oo) (bb) of the act. shri bukhari has established from the evidence and material on record that the petitioner had appointed and terminated six other security guards and that they were again re-employed on and from 14-9-1992. the petitioner had .....

G. Narayana Gowda Vs. B.L. Narayanaswami and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1960Kant150; AIR1960Mys150

..... the appellant and his part candidate for the reserved seat have got comparable numbers of votes and that indeed the appellant has secured a somewhat larger number of votes. we therefore find that this contention also has no force.(21) the appeal fails and is accordingly dismissed with costs (advocate's fee rs. 100/-).hegde, j.(22) i agree ..... the existence of a disqualification in respect of a candidate. clauses (b) and (c) relate to defects in fulfilling the requirements of secs. 33 and 34 of the act.the requirements under section 33 are : (i) that the candidate should present the nomination paper in person or by his proposer: (ii) that it should be presented between ..... qualification or is disqualified, cls. (b) and (c) provide for such rejection for failure to comply with the provisions of section 33 or section 34 of the act or on the ground that the signature of the candidate or the proposer on the nomination paper is not genuine. section 33 relates to the presentation of nomination papers .....

State Government Pensioners Association Vs. State of A.P. and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2004(1)ALD338

..... who retired subsequent to that date simultaneously denying the same to those who retired prior to that date. if the liberalisation was considered necessary for augmenting social security in old age to government servants then those who retired earlier cannot worst (sic) off than those who retire later. therefore, this division which classified pensioners ..... sought to be achieved.the above principles were laid down while considering the validity of a law made by legislature, but those principles apply with full force to executive orders also. the state is enjoined by article 14 to ensure equality not only in legislative matters but also in executive side. an executive ..... by the government after consultation with the recognized unions, such a decision cannot be unilaterally altered to their prejudice and thus the government is estopped from acting in derogation of the decisions taken. they also contended that when once the pension has been fixed on the basis of notional pay drawn, there is .....

Bhatele Ramesh Chand Vs. Dr. Shyam Lal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1946All34

..... another case botheroyd v. woolley (1835) 1 gale 66 the matter was put still more strongly: 'it is better to adhere to the plain words of the statute than to force constructions.' and nothing can be more emphatically pronounced than what was observed in the well-known case in woodward v. watts (1853) 2 el. & bl. 452:the golden rule ..... in veerayya v. kotireddi ('41) 28 a.i.r. 1941 mad. 588 the point really is, will the saving clause 'by any law for the time being in force' be given effect to in every case or only if the proceedings in the primary court are also governed by that law? this question has, as mentioned above, been answered ..... 1936 sharda prasad, respondent 2 and his two sons, respondents 3 and 4, applied under section 4, u.p. encumbered estates act, both ramesh chand, the appellant and dr. shyam lal, respondent 2, put in their claims as secured creditors and the learned special judge determined the claims of both these creditors and passed decrees in their favour on 1st september .....