Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: border security force act 1968 section 20 striking or threatening superior officers Page 4 of about 1,598 results (0.174 seconds)

Shri Chandram J.M. S/O Shri Jettappa Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) Rep. ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2008(3)KarLJ303; 2007(6)AIRKarR441; 2008LabIC(NOC)83(Kar)

..... made by the petitioner; that the writ petition is to be dismissed.34. petitioner is a member of the border security force which is a paramilitary force created under the border security force act, 1968. this force was part of central police act, 1949. it was given a separate identity as border security force. it appears after the year 1965, it was sought to be given an independent status and that heralded the ..... legislation of the border security force act, 1968. members of this force are governed by the provisions of this act. the service conditions are as prescribed .....

Gajendra Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1995CriLJ3347; 1995(3)WLC635; 1995(2)WLN31

..... dated 23rd july, 1994, passed by the learned sessions judge, jodhpur, whereby he allowed the application dated 23-5-1994 filed under section 80 of the border security force act, 1968 (in short, 'the act') by the d. i. g., b. s. f., bikaner (non-petitioner no. 2) and directed that the accused-petitioner be handed over to ..... . the central government in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (k) of sub-section (2) of section 141 of the act has made the criminal courts and border security force courts (adjustment of jurisdiction) rules 1969 (in short 'adjustment of jurisdiction rules'). rule 2(iii) of the said rules defines 'competent authority', which means ..... the director general, inspector general, or a deputy inspector general of the border security force.13. rule 3 deals with the trial of person subject to the act. it proclaims that where a person subject to the act is brought before a magistrate and charged with an offence for which he is liable to be .....

Bhushan Singh and anr. Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... dated 13.02.1997. 21. aggrieved by the finding and sentence awarded by the security force court which stood confirmed by the inspector general, the petitioners preferred petition(s) under section 117(2) of border security force act, 1969 to the directorate general border security force, ministry of home affairs, government of india, which petition(s) were rejected vide ..... last submission advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner was an extension of the first; that the circumstances on record establish that inspector general border security force, south bengal frontier was determined to convict the petitioners in the present case. learned counsel drew attention of the court to the fact that the ..... 20. the record of the case was forwarded to the inspector general border security force, south bengal frontier sh.r.n.bhattacharya for the purposes of the confirmation of the finding and sentence of the gfsc in terms of section 108 of act. vide order dated 27.09.1996, in exercise of his power .....

Krishna Chandra Chaurasiya Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2004(2)AWC1409; (2004)2UPLBEC1784

..... the first 12 questions detailed in part a, he would be liable to be punished, as provided in border security force act, 1968.8. section 23 of the border security force act, 1968 provides as below :'any person having become subject to this act who is discovered to have made at the time of enrolment a willfully false answer to any question set ..... it is not disputed that for giving false information in reply to the question no. 12 of the aforesaid questionnaire, the proceedings under section 23 of the border security force act had commenced. he was charged of making willful false statement to the aforesaid question and it was ultimately proved against the petitioner and the punishment in question ..... the first 12 of following questions you will be liable to be punished as provided in the border security force act, 1968.'since at the trial the petitioner was found to be guilty under section 23 of the b.s.f. act, 1968 for giving willful false answer to the question no. 12 contained in part a of .....

Constable No. 860020697, Rama Kant Shukla Vs. Union of India Through t ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2000(1)AWC783; (2000)1UPLBEC687

..... action nor any part of it had arisen within territorial jurisdiction of this court and secondly petitioner has an adequate and efficacious remedy available under section 117 border security force act, 1968.6. i have heard sri a. n. tripathi. learned counsel for the petitioner and sri 5. k. rai, advocate, learned counsel representing ..... and without undue delay decides on merit on being approached.15. in view of the above, petitioner may avail his alternative remedy under section 117. border security force act. 1968 in accordance with law which respondent shall not oppose on ground of delay/laches or limitation, as expressed before this court and noted above ..... from taking objection of delay, if petitioner approaches for relief under section 117, border security force act, 1968.in view of the above, no party has grievance if the rights of the petitioner are adjudicated on merit under section 117. border security force act. 1968.in the result, writ petition fails and is dismissed in limine solely .....

State of J and K and Another Vs. Lakhwinder Kumar and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... judicial custody. he went on to say that in exercise of his discretion under section 80 of the border security force act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the act) he has decided to institute proceeding against them before the security force court. in the aforesaid premise it was requested to stay the proceeding and to forward the accused persons ..... 549 of cr.p.c. 1989 (j and k) for instituting proceedings against them under the bsf act and rules made thereunder.6. that the outcome of the trial of the accused persons by border security force court of the result of effectual proceedings instituted or ordered to be taken against them shall be intimated as ..... command and,3. whereas in exercise of my discretion as envisaged in section 80 of the bsf act, 1968, i have decided to institute proceedings against the said accused persons lakhwinder kumar and randhir kumar birdi before the border security force court.4. whereas, the accused persons i.e. lakhwinder kumar and randhir kumar birdi are .....

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Ashok Kumar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC124; [2005(107)FLR840]; JT2005(12)SC515; 2005(8)SCALE397; (2005)8SCC760; 2006(1)SLJ312(SC)

..... held that the removal of the delinquent officer from service was in violation of the provisions contained in section 10 of the border security force act, 1968 (in short 'the act') read with rule 20 of the border security force rules, 1969 (in short 'the rules). the appeal filed by the delinquent officer was allowed upsetting the judgment of the ..... director general recorded his satisfaction that the material witnesses connected with case will not be available and as such the trial of the delinquent officer before security force court was inexpedient and impracticable and opined that further retention of the delinquent officer in service was undesirable.on 23/25.9.1992 show-cause ..... of chapter xiv of the rules, and he was found guilty of six lapses.(iii) the view formed by competent authority to dispense with holding of general security force court was on the basis of material on record. (iv) the decision to remove delinquent officer from service was not actuated by malafide consideration. (v .....

Abid Ali Khan Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1995(33)DRJ77; 1995LabIC371

..... four charges against the petitioner, for which he was tried by a petty security force court, found guilty and sentenced. three charges were under section 40 of the border security force act (for short the act) : ' an act prejudicial to good order and discipline of the force' and the 4th charge under section 46 of the act 'for having committed a civil offence being a public servant accepting from a ..... person for himself gratification other than legal remuneration as a reward for showing favor in the exercise of his official functions punishable under act 1988 .....

Deputy Inspector General, Border Security Force Vs. the State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2002IIIAD(Delhi)433; 96(2002)DLT217; 2002(62)DRJ16

..... the order dated 13th july, 1995, passed by the court of metropolitan magistrate, dismissing application moved by the commanding officer under section 80 of the border security force act, 1968 (for short, 'bsf act') read with bsf courts (adjustment of jurisdiction) rules, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the 'rules') framed by central government under section 475 cr.p ..... petitioner argued that section 475 cr.p.c. is equivalent to section 549 of the old code: that rules 3 to 9 of the criminal courts and border security force courts (adjustment of jurisdiction) rules, 1969 are equivalent to rules 3 to 9 in criminal courts and court martial (adjustment of jurisdiction) rules, 1952 and ..... there is a case for trial, and pursuant to the aforesaid rule delivers the accused to the commanding officer or the competent military, naval or air force authority, the law intends that the accused must either be tried by a court martial or some other effectual proceedings must be taken against him. to .....

Shiv Parshad Pandey Vs. C.B.i. Through Director, New Delhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2003(51)BLJR934; 2003CriLJ1710; JT2003(2)SC413; 2003(2)SCALE658; (2003)11SCC508; 2003(1)LC640(SC)

..... 17 or shall affectthe jurisdiction of a criminal court to try anyoffence triable by such court as well as by asecurity force court.'11. this section authorises the border security force to arrestand initiate proceedings and punish an offender who was subject tothe act provided such person is tried for an offence under the actwithin six months after he has ceased to be subject to ..... of the same offence thediscretion to proceed or not to proceed under the bsf act lies withthe director general, or other officers specified therein withinwhose command the accused person is serving. it must be noticedherein that this section applies only to such persons who 'isserving' in the border security force and not to a person whoceases to be an officer of the bsf at .....