Court : Guwahati
Decided on : Jun-27-1958
..... proposed allegation would not make the declaration good. the public are deeply interested in this rule, which indeed exists for their benefit and was established in order to secure the independence of judges and prevent their being harassed by vexatious actions.'' 19. the same principle was reiterated by fal-shaw, j. in behari lal v. state ..... who was in charge of rehabilitation. he stated that the plaintiff requested him to provide a wagon for the safe departure of some of his muslim tenants to border stations who were panick-striken and wanted to go away and that it was two or three days before his arrest. this might be what he desired. ..... commandeering private property for war purposes or quelling disturbances by force, to preserve the security of the stale stand on an altogether different footing. such acts are not justiciable in courts of law and the immunity of the state is almost unquestioned. there are other classes of acts which are done under the sanction of certain municipal laws .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Guwahati
Decided on : Aug-07-1958
..... property in dispute was situated and in which the document is said to have been executed. on the strength of these two notifications, it is urged that the registration act was in force in the year 1942 in this area. these two notifications were not brought to the notice of the lower appellate court, and the court below has relied upon ..... to be generally and reasonably for the benefit of the family (a) either by compromising doubtful or disputed rights or by preserving the family property (b) or the peace and security of the family by avoiding litigation (c) or by saving its honour.' the word 'family' has been given extensive meaning. any member of the family may be a party ..... appellant were not before the court below, in the normal course, we would have sent back the case for a further investigation into the matter whether the registration act was in force in that area or not. but as on the interpretation of the document, we are of the opinion that it does not come within section 17 of the .....
Tag this Judgment!