Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: border security force act 1968 section 17 mutiny Court: guwahati Year: 1956 Page 1 of about 3 results (0.060 seconds)

Jul 16 1956 (HC)

Ramesh Chandra Dey Vs. the State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jul-16-1956

Reported in : [1957]8STC384(Gauhati)

..... march, 1951, of the sales tax which was being levied before the commencement of the constitution and in fact the president, on the same day as the constitution came into force, actually made an order in exercise of this power as hereinbefore stated. there was, therefore, no immediate danger to state revenue and the status quo was maintained. further, clause ..... one state to another.12. and finally he summed up his conclusions in these memorable words:-the reasonings adopted by the learned judges in the above cases apply with full force not only to clause (2) but also to clause (1)(b) of article 286, and we should construe the words 'in the course of in the same way as ..... was delivered by das, acting c.j., (as he then was). he followed the majority view expressed in state of travancore-cochin and ors. v. shanmugha vilas cashew-nut factory a.i.r. 1953 s.c. 333. in this case it was found as a fact that the assessees were purchasing for purposes of export. they had secured orders already. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 16 1956 (HC)

Ramesh Chandra Dey Vs. the State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jul-16-1956

..... march, 1951, of the sales tax which was being levied before the commencement of the constitution and in fact the president, on the same day as the constitution came into force, actually made an order in exercise of this power as hereinbefore stated. there was, therefore, no immediate danger to state revenue and the status quo was maintained. further, clause ..... one state to another.12. and finally he summed up his conclusions in these memorable words:-the reasonings adopted by the learned judges in the above cases apply with full force not only to clause (2) but also to clause (1)(b) of article 286, and we should construe the words 'in the course of in the same way as ..... was delivered by das, acting c.j., (as he then was). he followed the majority view expressed in state of travancore-cochin and ors. v. shanmugha vilas cashew-nut factory a.i.r. 1953 s.c. 333. in this case it was found as a fact that the assessees were purchasing for purposes of export. they had secured orders already. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 21 1956 (HC)

Maidhandas Agarwalla Vs. Sricharan Barua

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : May-21-1956

..... and hirendra samaddar, reached dhubri on 11-7-51 and reported the matter to mr. j. n. chatterji, the pleader whom they engaged for the purpose of securing bail for maidhandas agarwalla. the petition for bail was moved the next day in court, and maidhandas was released on bail of rs. 1000/- that day by the ..... case against the accused, and directed their prosecution under relevant charges, as i have already indicated.7. the learned advocate for the accused sricharan barua has very forcefully argued that the learned special judge considered the evidence for what it is worth, and he has reasonably come to a finding that no case had been made ..... interest in prosecuting the complainant maidhandas agarwalla and his two partners, even though the police had, no obligation to prosecute persons for offences coming under the essential supplies act or the assam roodgrains control order, and the case itself was found not substantiated.the learned special judge at one place observes that if ext. 26, the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //