Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: border security force act 1968 section 17 mutiny Court: chennai Page 11 of about 2,968 results (0.297 seconds)

Aug 09 1979 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Rao Bahadur Calavala Cunnan Chetty Char ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1982]135ITR485(Mad)

..... prescribed manner specifying the purpose for which the income is being accumulated or set apart. the money so accumulated or set apart is to be invested in any govt. security. if the income so accumulated is not utilised after the expiry of ten years, then the income which remains so unutilised would be deemed to be the income of ..... income. section 11 gives the exemption as well as the exclusion, subject to certain conditions. section 11, in so far as it is material and as it was in force in the relevant year, ran as follows :'subject to the provisions of sections 60 to 63, the following income shall not be included in the total income of the ..... that the authorities below had not applied the provisions properly. in substance, the tribunal's conclusions were that the ito should determine the actual income in accordance with the act, and arrive at 25 per cent. thereof and that after having ascertained the said figures the ito had to determine whether there was any surplus left which was in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 24 2010 (HC)

G. Alayamani S/O Gopal Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Its Secreta ...

Court : Chennai

..... the powers vested in him, the government shall, by notice in writing, require the chairman to offer within a specified date, his explanation with respect to his acts of omission or commission mentioned in the notice.(2) if the explanation is received within the specified date and the government considers that the explanation is satisfactory, the ..... imperative on the part of the presiding officer to record the votes by ballot on a motion expressing no confidence against a sarpanch under the bombay village panchayats act, 1958. there also were two provisions, one governing the election of the sarpanch and the other governing the no confidence motion. when it came to the election ..... the appellant, had submitted, on the other hand, that a reference to the general rules governing the meetings is not excepted, since section 212(1) of the act provides that motion of no-confidence is to be made in accordance with the procedure laid down herein meaning thereby in the very section. it was, therefore, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 15 2012 (HC)

Chandramohan Vs. Shanmugavalli

Court : Chennai

..... be traced. in his cross examination, dw.1 admitted that he has no proof to show that the original will was submitted to the bank either as security or surety and further admitted that he has not requested the bank in writing to return back the original will. hence, it is evidently clear that he has ..... .r.subramaniam, the learned counsel for the respondent contended that the appellant must satisfactorily prove the execution of the will in accordance with the provisions of succession act and the propounder must remove the suspicions surrounding the execution of the will by cogent and satisfactory evidence. the learned counsel relied on the observations made in ..... , namely chellammal. it was strenuously contended that ex.b25 will had not been proved in accordance with the strict requirements of section 68 of the indian evidence act. the learned counsel would also submit that the appellant is not legally permitted to claim adverse possession, when he has claimed ownership to the suit property by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 18 2006 (HC)

Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited Rep. by Its Vice Presiden ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2006]134CompCas267(Mad); 2006(3)CTC529; (2006)2MLJ822; [2006]72SCL18(Mad)

..... first taking any of the measures specified in clauses (a) to (d) of sub-section (4) in relation to the secured assets under this act.(12) the rights of a secured creditor under this act may be exercised by one or more of his officers authorized in this behalf in such manner as may be prescribed.(13) ..... 13 is as under:-section 13: enforcement of security interest:- (1) notwithstanding anything contained in section 69 or ..... provisions of this act to override other laws:-the provisions of this act shall have effect, notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force or any instrument having effect by virtue of any such law. 8. the relevant provision of the securitisation act about the rights of secured creditor in section .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 04 2012 (HC)

Ms. Infovision Private Limited. Vs. the Inspector of Police and ors.

Court : Chennai

..... reconstruction company registered with the reserve bank of india under the provisions of the securitisation and reconstruction of financial assets and enforcement of security interest act, 2002 (sarfaesi act). the impleading petitioner is recognized as a 'financial institution" within the meaning of section 2(h)(ia) of the recovery of ..... magistrate on 24.11.2009 and informed that the property is in possession of the impleading petitioner in terms of the provisions of the sarfaesi act. the learned executive magistrate directed the impleading petitioner's representatives to file written submissions and documents regarding the rights of the impleading petitioner. ..... forced to initiate, inter alia, the following actions:-(i) several original applications before the ho'ble debts recovery tribunal, chennai in the year 1996 for recover of money under the rddb act including through sale of the mortgaged assets;(ii) a notice dated december 15, 2004 was issued under section 13(2) of the sarfaesi act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 16 2012 (HC)

Ramalingam Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

..... 9 tanks mentioned in the plaint schedule have been in enjoyment of the plaintiff's family for the past 50-60 years. when the village panchayat act of 1958 has come into force all the tanks described as poramboke in government accounts have been handed over to the village panchayat. but concerning village poramboke tanks belonging to private persons, ..... public auction by the block development officer or an officer deputed as per g.o. in force and that the plaintiff subbiah mudaliar therein could be present and even bid at the auction without prejudice and the best price would therefore, be secured etc.41.at this stage, it is to be pointed out that section 132 of the ..... tamil nadu panchayats act, 1994 speaks of 'vesting of communal property or income in village panchayat' which reads as follows:"any property .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 14 2000 (HC)

A.C. Lakshmipathy and Another Vs. A.M. Chakrapani Reddiar and Five Oth ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR2001Mad135; (2001)1MLJ1:2009AIRSCW7144:2009(6)LHSC3858

..... they have been executed on or after the date on which, act no. xvi of 1864, or the indian registration act 1866 (20 of 1866) or indian registration act, 1871 (8 of 1871) or the indian registration act, 1877 (3 of 1877) or this act came or comes into force, namely- (a)........ (b) other non-testamentary instruments which ..... purport or operate to create, declare, assign, limit or extinguish, whether in future, any right, title or interest, whether vested or contingent, of the value of one hundred rupees and upwards to or in immovable property; 19. the indian stamp act, ..... itself does not create or extinguish any rights in immovable properties and therefore does not fall within the mischief of section 17 of the indian registration act and therefore, not compulsorily registerable. similarly, a mere list prepared by the parties, not setting out the entire terms of the family arrangement need be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 10 2003 (HC)

P. Deeptha and Minor P.Prashant, Rep. by Father and Natural Guardian D ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2004(1)ALD(Cri)859; III(2003)BC479; 2003CriLJ4660; 2003(3)CTC202

..... herein appears to have filled up a fictitious date in the cheque and presented it for collection; that since the transaction for which the said cheque was given as security had already been satisfactorily closed, her father did not bother to check the account, and therefore, the cheque was dishonoured; that the respondent herein issued a notice ..... juvenile. ... if a juvenile is accused of any offence, committed under section 223 of the code of criminal procedure or any other law for the time being in force, but for the prohibition contained in sub-section (1), such juvenile and any person who is not a juvenile, are charged and tried together, the board taking cognizance ..... void, without jurisdiction and void ab initio; and (e) that the cheque has been issued only as security and not for the discharge of any lawful debt or obligation, and therefore, the proceedings u/s. 138 of the act are not maintainable.4. in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent, it would be submitted that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 06 2011 (HC)

K.Murugeswari Vs. Tamil Nadu State Election Commission and ors.

Court : Chennai

..... 2007] 8 scc 449, which was relating to certain proceedings under section 13(2) of the securitization, reconstruction of financial assets and enforcement of security interest act, 2002, wherein by referring to the powers of this court under article 226 of the constitution of india, the supreme court has observed as ..... like the returning officers, etc., especially in respect of rejection of nomination, for which a remedy is available under the madurai city municipal corporation act, 1971.23. by following the earliest judgment on this issue, viz., n.p.ponnuswami v. returning officer, air 1952 sc 64, it ..... exercise of the powers conferred under the tamil nadu district municipalities act, chennai city municipal corporation act, madurai city municipal corporation act, coimbatore city municipal corporation act, tiruchirapalli city municipal corporation act, tirunelveli city municipal corporation act, salem city municipal corporation act, the governor of tamil nadu in consultation with the tamil nadu .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 06 2011 (HC)

Sanmina Sci Thozhilalar Sangam Vs. Commissioner of Labour Dms Compound ...

Court : Chennai

..... for mandamus will not lie for an order of reinstatement to an office which is essentially of a private character nor can such an application be maintained to secure performance of obligations owed by a company towards its workmen or to resolve any private dispute. (see sohan lal v. union of india.)therefore, the term ..... are the permanent workers, raises any dispute regarding the conditions of service and for that purpose, resorts to any method which is prescribed under the industrial disputes act, the same is different. but, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition challenging the advertisement on surmises that the permanent workmen of the third respondent company ..... all consequences to the telecom regulatory authority. (d) the third respondent also manufactures several critical equipments, which are supplied to the army and air force for use in ground as well as air borne radars. therefore, the functioning of the third respondent is in public interest and it is also vital for the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //