Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jun-15-1999
Reported in : ILR1999KAR2903; 1999(4)KarLJ668
..... special licences, hotel and boarding house licences, tourist hotel licences, tourist hotel beer bar licences, military canteen licences, military canteen stores bonded warehouse licence, border security force or paramilitary force licences, refreshment room (bar) licence, auctioneer's licences. rule 4 deals with filing of applications; rules 4-a, 5 provides for grant of licences ..... the same are liable to be dismissed.4. to appreciate the above contentions, it is relevant to extract some of the provisions of the act. the act is promulgated with a view to provide uniform laws regarding production, manufacture, import, export, purchase and sale of liquor and in such states ..... interest litigation assailing the action of the officers of the excise department empowered to grant licences, in granting innumerable licences under the karnataka excise act, 1965 ('act', for short) and rules framed therein. brief facts of the case are:2. the petitioners are the residents of different places in the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jul-28-1999
Reported in : ILR2000KAR453; 2000(3)KarLJ242
..... stipulation which would indicate that the possession of the land in question was handed over to the father of the third respondent on 12th of june, 1961 as a security in respect of the loan advanced to the first petitioner. on the other hand, in the document annexure-c, it is stated in unequivocal terms that the land ..... if such land is not cultivated personally by the owner and if such person is not.-- (a) member of the owner's family, ..................'. further, section 24 of the act clearly provides that the tenancy rights are heritable. the said section reads as follows:'24. right of tenant to be heritable.--where a tenant dies, the landlord shall be ..... has leased the land in question as per documents annexure-c and d and further the document annexure-d, in unequivocal terms, states that the first petitioner is acting on behalf of the second petitioner also while executing the said document, the possession of the father of the third respondent in respect of the land in question being .....
Tag this Judgment!