Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: border security force act 1968 section 126 execution of sentence of fine Page 16 of about 178 results (0.114 seconds)

Sri Dattusingh Rathod Vs. The Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

..... 06.2016 noticing the fact that the order of penalty of dismissal from service was appealable under section 117 of the border security force act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the said act for short) directed the petitioner to file an appeal before the appellate authority.4. petitioner in terms of the direction ..... the same, suffer from no error.18. in the aforesaid facts, it is necessary to emphasize that border security force is a disciplined force. discipline is of paramount importance in central paramilitary forces like the border security force. the petitioner having violated good order and discipline on several occasions, rightly incurred a penalty of dismissal ..... dated 22.06.2009 passed by the third respondent commandant and the order dated 06.02.2017 passed by the second respondent-director general, border security force imposing penalty of 3 dismissal from service pursuant to certain disciplinary proceedings.2. sans unnecessary details, the facts that are germane for consideration .....

Director General, Border Security Force and ors. Vs. Iboton Singh (Kh)

Court : Guwahati

..... the accused having been lodged by the coy. commander, moreh coy. the bsf authorities exercised their discretion, under section 80 of the border security force act, 1968 (in short, 'bsf act'), to institute a general security force court (in short, 'gsfc'). a gsfc was accordingly convened and the respondent herein faced the trial on the charge of having intentionally caused ..... is further submitted by mr. komal that even if the learned single judge had noticed some infraction, in either following the procedure prescribed under the bsf act and the border security force rules (in short, 'the bsf rules') framed thereunder or even if the learned single judge had found that the summing up by the law officer ..... for trial by a sfc has to be tested on the touchstone of article 21 and if the procedural safeguards given to a person from the border security force, under the bsf act and/or the bsf rules, are violated, violation thereof would, in substance, be denial of the right to a fair trial. a person, .....

Rita Singh Vs. Govt. of India and anr

Court : Delhi

..... bearing no. 330, d-6, vasant kunj, new delhi to the petitioner.3. relying upon the definition of enemy given in section 2(j) of the border security force act, 1968, which defines enemy to include all armed mutineers, armed rebels, armed rioters, pirates and any person in arms against whom it is the duty of any ..... the defence category, the allotment would be cancelled.2. the petitioner sought information from various authorities with respect to definition of the expression war widow. the border security force vide letter dated 12.06.2012 informed dda that the husband of the petitioner had sacrificed his life in a militant attack on 16.08.1992, while ..... in this regard, delhi development authority should not lose sight of the fact that the officers and jawans of para-military forces such as border security force are constantly engaged in an important duty in the security of the nation, at tremendous risk to their life and, therefore, attempt should be to give an interpretation which is .....

Siya Ram Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

t. vaiphei, j.1. this writ petition is filed by the petitioner challenging the proceeding of the summary security force court held against the petitioner under section 46 and 40 of the border security force act, 1968 (the act for short) and the penalty/sentence contained in the order dated 10.8.2001 of reduction in rank to the post of constable from havildar passed in connection therewith ..... in sections 47, 52 and 80 of the act read with rules 41 and 42 of the border security force rules, 1969 ('the rules' for short), all offences under the act committed by a person subject to the act are to be tried by the security force courts constituted under the act, namely, (1) general security force courts, (2) petty security force courts and (3) summary security force courts. the provisions of section 52 provide .....

Dula Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2000)126PLR609

..... bad as no show cause notice was served upon the plaintiff. counsel further contended that under section 11 of the border security force act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the act) read with rules 20 and 21 of the border security force rules, 1969 ( hereinafter referred to as the rules) it was mandatory for the commandant not only to cause ..... 3.1980 but after availing of said leave he did not resume his duties. as a result court of enquiry was ordered under the relevant provision of border security force act and the rules framed thereunder. based upon the opinion of court of enquiry, plaintiff was declared deemed to be deserter. subsequently, show cause notice dated ..... and, therefore, is of no help to the case of the defendant.11. counsel for the union of india then contended that members of border security force being part of armed forces of the union, are not civil servants and, therefore, cannot invoke the principles of natural justice and article 311 of the constitution of india .....

Balwan Singh S/O Late Sh. Jagdev Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Throu ...

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2003(1)JKJ104

..... record of the file, it is clearly discernible that the respondents have strictly complied with the procedure before passing order of dismissal in conformity with the border security force act and the rules on the subject, details where of are explicitly given in para 4 of the counter, which reads as under:-4. that the ..... is that the petitioner without exhausting the statutory remedy provided under section 117 of the border security force act 1968 read with rule 22 of the border security force rules, 1969, which provides that a person aggrieved by a finding or sentence of any security force court may put up one petition to the confirming authority before confirmation and one ..... reply or to present himself by issuing a show cause notice dated 4.1.2001, as envisaged. under the provision of rule 22 of the border security force rules. it is also stated that all statutory requirements were observed by the respondents viz issuing various letters to the petitioner for re-joining conducted court .....

Ravi Kumar Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... rules, and for purpose of which, chapter xv titled special provisions relating to border security force was inserted in the crpf rules. on 02.09.1968 the parliament enacted the border security force act 1968, to provide for the constitution and regulation of an armed force of the union for ensuring the safety of the borders of india and the matters connected therewith. in exercise of the power conferred ..... by section 141 of the bsf act, the central government promulgated the border security force rules 1969, governing the conditions of service of .....

Union of India and ors. Vs. Madhu E.V. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... less than 20 years are entitled to pension/pensionary benefits under relevant provisions of the border security force act, 1968 (for short, "bsf act") and the bsf rules or the ccs (pension) rules.8. this court referred to section 8 of the bsf act and rule 19 of the bsf rules and the provisions of the ccs (pension) ..... grounds.later on, it was found that the pensionary benefits were not admissible to them and few others whose resignation was accepted under rule 19 of the border security force rules, 1969 (for short, "bsf rules"). accordingly, on october 20, 1998, a letter was sent intimating them that no pensionary benefits were admissible to ..... mr. m.p. vinod, learned counsel for the respondents.3. the respondents were the original writ petitioners before the high court. they were constables in the border security force (bsf). on completion of 10 years service, they tendered resignation. their resignation was accepted by the commandant 48 bn bsf. the order accepting resignation provided that .....

Union of India Vs. Virpal Singh

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

..... against the respondent had provided sufficient opportunity of hearing to the respondent, that the court of inquiry held u/s 62 of the border security force act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the act) beside other material before the commandant was sufficient for the commandant to arrive at the conclusion that the trial of the respondent was ..... remedy under rule 28 of the border security force rules, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the rules) therefore was not entitled to any relief under article 226 of the constitution of india, that there ..... respondent reinstated while leaving the appellant free to pass a fresh order in accordance with law. 2. we have heard mr. varinder kumar, deputy commandant, border security force, who has assailed the judgement passed by the ld. single judge inter alia on the ground that the respondent had failed to avail of an efficacious alternative .....

No.90006506 CT Gajen Gara Goyary Vs. The Union of India, Represented b ...

Court : Guwahati

..... that the punishment for the constable is required to be revisited by the authorities. the various punishments awardable by the security force court are specified in section 48 of the border security force act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the bsf act ) and apart from dismissal, other punishment options are available under section 48(1)(c) of the bsf ..... act. in my view the mitigating factors in respect of the delinquent constable were not taken into account by the bsf ..... respondents are represented by ms. a. gayan, the learned central govt. counsel (cgc). 2. the petitioner was a constable in the 57th battalion of the border security force (bsf) and while he was on naka duty along with head constable dwarika prasad, both members of the g coy unit were placed under suspension by the .....