Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: border security force act 1968 section 115 transmission of proceedings of summary security force courts Court: sebi securities and exchange board of india or securities appellate tribunal sat Page 1 of about 1 results (0.232 seconds)

Goldman Sachs Investments Vs. the Adjudicating Officer,

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Reported in : (2008)BusLR611NULL

..... the circular dated august 8, 2003 and regulation 13 (1) of the regulations and, therefore, initiated adjudication proceedings under chapter via of the securities and exchange board of india act, 1992 (hereinafter called the act). the adjudicating officer served a notice dated june 6, 2006 calling upon the appellant to show cause why penalty be not imposed in terms of ..... with such persons. this requirement of an undertaking appears to us to be opposed to all norms of reason and is totally devoid of logic. in fact, it borders on absurdity and is arbitrary. when the fiis and their subaccounts have not been debarred from dealing in odis with indian residents/ nris/ pios/ocbs and many of ..... principles of natural justice. it is after all an approved rule of fair play. the concept has gained significance and shades with time. these observations apply with full force to the facts of our case. in view of what we have said above, we have no hesitation in holding that the show cause notice is not only .....

Reliance Infocomm Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) (Dot)

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

..... vests that privilege and right in the central government".it must also be noticed that licenses have been granted under section 4 of the telegraph act before the trai act came into force. we, therefore, do not find any merit in this contention of mr.salve and reject the same.44. in the present case ..... the tender conditions supreme court noticed that in section iii contained different conditions including in respect of security in clause 16. the court said that there was no dispute with the expression 'telegraph' as defined in the telegraph act shall include telephones and telecommunication services. the court noticed: "in view of the clear and ..... the nature of license is such that any breach of its obligations on the security aspect can be of serious consequence for the nation. mr.vahanvati, learned solicitor general said that conduct of the respondent borders .....

Kishore Rajaram Chhabria Vs. the Chairman Securities and

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Reported in : (2003)46SCL385SAT

..... -compliance of the conditions of the listing agreement. for violation of any provision of the listing agreement, at the highest, only the provisions of the securities contracts (regulations) act, 1956 ("scra") would be applicable. assuming that even a non-party to such listing agreement could be penalized, that section 23(2) of the ..... cannot invoke the general provisions of section 11 and 11 b of the sebi act since any breach of listing agreement could be actionable only under the scra and not under the sebi act. the securities contract regulation rules which has statutory force, having been prescribed under the scra does not contain any provisions akin to ..... in section 11a as may be appropriate in the interests of investors in securities and the securities market." section 11b was incorporated in the act with effect from 25.1.1995 vide "securities (laws) amendment act, 1995".119. chapter via of the sebi act provides for penalties and adjudications. sebi has invoked section 15a and 15h for .....

Rakesh Agrawal Vs. Securities Exchange Board of

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

..... regulation 11 would be "inoperative and infructuous" in the facts and circumstances, pursuant to section 11(1) r/w section 11 b of the securities and exchange board of india act, 1992 ("act" or "sebi act") the chairman who wuomoto directed the appellant to deposit a sum of under the provisions of section 11(1) read with section 11b the ..... promoters. this is recorded in the minutes of the meeting.20. in the last week of december, 1996, owing to considerable pressure from the financial institutions, bayer was forced to increase the offer price from rs.70/- per share to rs.80/- per share. the announcement to increase in the offer price appeared in the news paper ..... no relevance in the present context. the issue in that matter, related to the construction of the word "obtained", in section 1(3) of the companies securities (insider dealing) act 1985. in the present appeal, there cannot be any dispute that the appellant was an insider at the appropriate time and that by reason of his possession he .....

In Re: Harikishan Hiralal Now

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

..... the orders pipl 40702800000015724 p111 00.00.56 to 00.01.44 pipl 40702800000015725 p111 pipl 40702800000015726 p111 pipl 40702800000015727 p111 pipl 40702800000015728 p111 asl 29320100000586707 p089 parkligh securities hh 26700600010046538 5070 hh 26700600010046539 5070 hh 26700600010046540 5070 hh 26700600010046541 5070 b.executed with each other for time difference between the orders hh 26700600010046585 5070 26700600010046586 5070 ..... shivkumar h bissa, proprietor of hh on all the four days.29. it is thus established that all the acts of hh resulted in violation of regulation 4 (a), (b) & (d) of sebi (prohibition of fraudulent and unfair trade practices relating to securities market) regulations, 1995.30. coming to the violation of clauses a (2), (3) and (4) of ..... /s harikishan hiralal now known as shreehari hira stock broking pvt. ltd. (pan no.aajcs0518d) for a period of one month.35. this order shall come into force immediately after the expiry of 21 days from the date of this order. .....