Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: border security force act 1968 section 108 power to confirm finding and sentence of general security force court Court: karnataka Page 1 of about 10 results (0.164 seconds)

Shri Chandram J.M. S/O Shri Jettappa Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) Rep. ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2008(3)KarLJ303; 2007(6)AIRKarR441; 2008LabIC(NOC)83(Kar)

..... made by the petitioner; that the writ petition is to be dismissed.34. petitioner is a member of the border security force which is a paramilitary force created under the border security force act, 1968. this force was part of central police act, 1949. it was given a separate identity as border security force. it appears after the year 1965, it was sought to be given an independent status and that heralded the ..... legislation of the border security force act, 1968. members of this force are governed by the provisions of this act. the service conditions are as prescribed .....

Constable Basavaraj Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [2005(107)FLR468]; ILR2005KAR3513

..... the commandant of bsf (annexure-a) dismissing the petitioner from service on the ground that he was found guilty of charge under section 20(a) of the border security force act, 1968 (in short, 'the act').2. the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-(a) to quash the order of dismissal dated 7.10.2001 bearing no. estt/ssfc-br/63 ..... to be dismissed as devoid of any merits,8. as per annexure-b viz., the proceedings of the summary security force court pertaining to the trial of the accused for the offence under section 20(a) of the act, the commandant, 63 bn bsf had framed a charge on 4,9.2001 against the petitioner alleging that on ..... the petitioner was falsely implicated in the criminal case for the offence of using criminal force or assaulting his superior officer under section 20(a) of the act. accordingly, the petitioner was charge sheeted and tried by the summary security force court (ssfc) under the bsf act. the s s f c found the petitioner guilty of charge under section 20(a .....

Constable Basavaraj S/O Vurpanna Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) Rep. by ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2007KAR485; 2006(4)KCCR2695; 2006(6)AIRKarR272

..... 7-10-2001 and 27-2-2002 produced as annexures-'a' and 'k'. as per annexure-'a', the petitioner basavaraj who is a constable in the border security force was dismissed from service with effect from 7-10-2001. as per annexure-'k' order, the statutory petition filed by the writ petitioner against the dismissal ..... -2001 in the special train carrying troops from samba to farrakka, proceedings were initiated against the petitioner and he was tried by the summary security force court (ssfc) tinder the bsf act. the allegation was that during a quarrel between head constable puran singh and head constable b. balakrishnan, the petitioner intervened and while separating ..... head constable puran singh and head constable balakrishna had taken place and the petitioner had intervened. the area of dispute is only with regard to the acts done by the petitioner in the process of separating the quarrelling superiors. there are different versions regarding the cause of injury suffered by puran singh. according .....

N. Bommon Behram and anr. Vs. the Government of Mysore and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1970Kant89; AIR1970Mys89

..... to the writ petition. certain lands which are owned by the petitioners were notified for acquisition under section 4(1) of the act. the lands were required for the use of the border security force under the control of the central government. prior to the issue of this notification on 1-5-1967, there were certain ..... district. reference is made in this letter to the secretary having forwarded a semiofficial letter from sri p, e. rajagopal, deputy director (admn.) directorate general of border security force, new delhi. it has been stated by the secretary to the deputy commissioner that in view of what rajagopal has stated in his communication, the deputy commissioner ..... 5, 9, 11, 12 and 13 belonging to shri bomman behram and smt. mehra mehta of vaderapura village acquired for locating the viii battalion of the border security force. the breakup of the total award with reasons indicated against each of the items is as under.'then the communication indicates what in the opinion of the .....

Sri Dattusingh Rathod Vs. The Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

..... 06.2016 noticing the fact that the order of penalty of dismissal from service was appealable under section 117 of the border security force act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the said act for short) directed the petitioner to file an appeal before the appellate authority.4. petitioner in terms of the direction ..... the same, suffer from no error.18. in the aforesaid facts, it is necessary to emphasize that border security force is a disciplined force. discipline is of paramount importance in central paramilitary forces like the border security force. the petitioner having violated good order and discipline on several occasions, rightly incurred a penalty of dismissal ..... dated 22.06.2009 passed by the third respondent commandant and the order dated 06.02.2017 passed by the second respondent-director general, border security force imposing penalty of 3 dismissal from service pursuant to certain disciplinary proceedings.2. sans unnecessary details, the facts that are germane for consideration .....

Mr P S Venkatesh Vs. The Secretary

Court : Karnataka

..... of posting and deputation) rules, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the said rules for short). these rules are framed under sub section (2) of section 141 of the border security force act, 1968. it cannot, therefore, be in doubt that the rules are statutes. the rule that is germane for consideration of the issue in the lis is rule 10, ..... yelahanka, bengaluru to odisha.2. brief facts leading to the filing of present petition as borne out from the pleadings are that, the petitioner joined the services of border security force (hereinafter referred to as the bsf for short) as a constable in the year 1984 and at the relevant point in replaced page no.2 vide chamber order dated ..... 3. authority for move : ig (spl ops) bsf odisha 4. purpose of move : as mentioned above 5. he will maintain strict discipline enroute and will not discuss any security matters with any un-authorised person.6. on arrival at destination, he will report to dig (pso), ftr thq (spl ops) bsf odisha for further orders.7. in case .....

Nandi Infrastructure Corridor Enterprise Ltd. Represented by Its Duly ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2008KAR1933; 2008(5)KarLJ583; 2008(2)KCCRSN90

..... ground level reservoir and this is the main pipeline supplying water to the western and northern pert of bangalore city, alongwith new bangalore international airport, indian air force, border security force premises etc. the pipeline is in service for all 24 hours and 365 days of the year. if the proposed work of shifting the pipeline is taken up ..... line,15. it is contended that the transmission line exists in a prohibited area as laid down under section 29 of the bangalore water supply and sewarage board act, 1964, and therefore, no structure or road can be constructed over the water tine. the petitioners cannot as a matter of right, claim or demand that ..... and that the petitioner have every right to execute the project and the components thereof, it would follow that the respondents have a duty cast on them to act in tandem with the petitioners in executing the project notwithstanding, the hurdles that required to be taken in stride. the respondents seeking to procrastinate on the ground .....

Nagaraju Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1999KAR2903; 1999(4)KarLJ668

..... special licences, hotel and boarding house licences, tourist hotel licences, tourist hotel beer bar licences, military canteen licences, military canteen stores bonded warehouse licence, border security force or paramilitary force licences, refreshment room (bar) licence, auctioneer's licences. rule 4 deals with filing of applications; rules 4-a, 5 provides for grant of licences ..... the same are liable to be dismissed.4. to appreciate the above contentions, it is relevant to extract some of the provisions of the act. the act is promulgated with a view to provide uniform laws regarding production, manufacture, import, export, purchase and sale of liquor and in such states ..... interest litigation assailing the action of the officers of the excise department empowered to grant licences, in granting innumerable licences under the karnataka excise act, 1965 ('act', for short) and rules framed therein. brief facts of the case are:2. the petitioners are the residents of different places in the .....

Mahalingappa s/o.amareshwarappa Mathapathi Vs. The State Through Lokay ...

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

..... the accused by the trial court.3. pw.11-mr. mahantayya has lodged the first information report as per ex.p16 stating that, he has been working in border security force at kolkata. his father by name panchayya has a landed property in survey no.77 measuring 1 acre 39 guntas situated at koutha-k village, aurad taluk, bidar district ..... registered a case in crime no.1/2001 for the offences punishable under sections 7 and 13(1) (d) of the p.c. act, 1988 and taken-up investigation. the investigating officer after securing the panch-witnesses to his office conducted a pre-trap mahazar as per ex.p13, in order to lay a trap against the accused. ..... . therefore, broadly speaking, the expression gratification used in section-7 means illegal or corrupt means of receiving money as used in section 13(1)(d) of the act includes all types of satisfaction or desire of the accused sought to be fulfilled by the complainant. anything which gives satisfaction to the recipient other than the legal remuneration .....

K.G. Devraj and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) by Its Secretary, Minist ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2005KAR2057; 2005(4)KarLJ239

..... legal benefits flowing there from to these petitioners.2. the brief facts of the case are that, petitioners herein were appointed as instructors/lecturers/technicians in the border security force (bsf) institute of technology, which is affiliated to aicte. in pursuance of the notification issued by the competent authority, these petitioners have attended their interviews ..... side and without prejudice to para 10 therein. further, sri. krishna s. dixit, learned counsel for union of india vehemently submitted that, the bona fide act of abolition of posts is taken on the ground that, there is poor response from students for taking admission to the said course, which is now ..... control, they could not utilise the services of these petitioners within the institute run by the bsf education fund society in other states and they were forced to terminate the services of these petitioners by abolishing their respective posts. to substantiate the said stand, sri. dixit has also placed heavy reliance on .....