Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: border security force act 1968 section 108 power to confirm finding and sentence of general security force court Court: chennai Page 1 of about 1 results (0.161 seconds)

Major P.Parathasarathy Versus Union of India, Rep by Its Secretary for ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

..... . thereafter, the petitioner served in the dg (s) establishment 22 (cabinet secretariat) emergency affairs cell ii from july 1969 to january 1971. subsequently, he joined border security force in january 1971 and served as assistant commandant till his release in august 1974. thereafter in august 1977, the petitioner joined territorial army and was released from service ..... of 2001 before the honourable high court of andhra pradesh at hyderabad, which has subsequently been transferred to this tribunal, after the formation of armed forces tribunal under armed forces tribunal act 2007 and renumbered as t.a.no.55 of 2009. 2. the affidavit to the petition filed by the petitioner for the relief of ..... commission. (iii)as explained above even the total qualifying service of the petitioner comes to 7 years 52 days. (iv)the reference to act 14 of constitution is irrelevant as there is no comparison between an emergency commissioned officer who has rendered 12 years of continuous service in the armed .....

M. Loganathan Vs. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1994(73)ELT281(Mad)

..... warrants and authorisation for arrests, search and seizure.' section 42 of the n.d.p.s. act reads as follows :- 'power of entry, search, seizure and arrest without warrant or authorisation - (1 ..... so authorised under sub-section (2) shall have all the powers of an officer acting under sec. 42. this section empowers (in addition to the first class magistrate and specially empowered second class magistrate) the gazetted officers of the central excise, narcotics, drugs control, customs, revenue intelligence, border security force, revenue, excise, police or other departments of the central and state governments to issue .....

P.Mullaivendan. Vs. the Director of School Education

Court : Chennai

..... service and not from different service to government service.20. in the sub-inspector rooplal's case (cited supra), the sub- inspectors belonging to border security force were absorbed into delhi police service. the service rendered in the border security force was not taken into account for fixation of seniority. the honourable apex court after referring to its earlier decisions in k.madhavan vs. union of ..... ) scc 189 fortifies the aforesaid conclusions of mine."16........this is where, as here, the transferor and/or transferee is a state or a state instrumentality, which is required to act fairly and not arbitrarily (see the recent pronouncement in mahabir auto stores v. indian oil corporation and the court has a say as to whether the terms and conditions on .....

Rekha Parameswari Alias Gnanambigal Muthiah Vs. Assistant Collector of ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1992CriLJ901; 1992(37)ECC105

..... central excise, narcotics, customs, revenue, intelligence or any other department of the central government or the border security force. learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that the search, seizure and arrest had been effectuated by the lady security officer at the airport, who is an officer in the cadre of a sub-inspector of police, ..... particulars as the officer referred to in sub-section (1) may consider relevant to the identity of the narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances in any proceedings under this act and make an application, to any magistrate for the purpose of - (a) certifying the correctness of the inventory so prepared, or (b) taking, in ..... the test report for determining the nature of the substance seized from the petitioner has not been obtained from the authority prescribed under the rules framed under the act, and therefore, it is, that the prosecution launched against the petitioner is liable to be quashed. 3. mr. p. rajamanickam, learned counsel appearing for .....

G. Muthu Vs. the Management of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2007)ILLJ9Mad; (2006)4MLJ1669

..... should be attributed to the said provision and section 2(i) of the act is not exhaustive.12.3. in this connection, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant has relied on a judgment of the hon'ble apex court rendered in vijoy and director-general, border security force reported in 2006 (1) l.l.n 665 wherein it has been ..... regard for more than one reason. first of all, the decision reported in air 1991 s.c. 1003 is much earlier to the enactment of the present act which came into force in the year 1995. secondly, even in that case, certain guidelines have been formulated by their lordships wherein the employees have been given certain benefits. in paragraph ..... and should try to give a meaning, which would adhere to the purpose of the statute. we find full force in the submission of the learned counsel for the appellant. the object which section 47 of the act purports to achieve is that appropriate provision should be made for the employees employed in the establishments who acquire a .....

Sundaresan Alias Meganathan Alias Mega Vs. State

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1993CriLJ3342

..... .s. act reads as follows :- '42. power of entry, search-seizure and arrest without warrant or authorisation :- (1) any such officer (being an officer superior in rank to a peon, sepoy, or constable) of the departments of central excise, narcotics, customs revenue, intelligence or any other department of the central government or of the border security force as is ..... his body for anything he would do so in the presence of a magistrate or a responsible government official of a higher rank. babu and other police persons forced the petitioner to deliver him gold bracelet, gold diamond ring, gold chain and cash of about rs. 200/-. all these were taken by babu, the inspector of ..... bail. in case of inconsistency between section 439, cr.p.c. and section 37 of the ndps act, section 37 prevails. the provisions of s. 48 cr.p.c. also make it clear that when there is an enactment in force relating to the manner of investigation, enquiry of otherwise dealing with such offences, the other powers under .....

K. Leela Vs. State

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1999(113)ELT398(Mad)

..... the act the first contention raised by the learned counsel for the appellant does not survive. he has invited my attention to section 41(2) which reads as follows :- 'any such officer of gazetted rank of the departments of central excise, customs, revenue intelligence or any other department of the central government or of the border security force as is ..... a lady should search an accused who is lady. p.w. 3 being a lady she searched the person of the accused in his presence. similarly, he secured the presence of one murugan who is the manager of the lodge. in the cross examination of all these witnesses noting particulars have been brought on record to ..... o. 824(e), dated november 14, 1985 wherein in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of section 41 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (61 of 1985), the central government hereby empowers the officers, of and above the rank of superintendent being officers of gazetted rank and working in the executive .....

K. Kuvendran Vs. Union of India, rep. by the Secretary, Ministry of Ho ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... -591 and seeking a direction to the respondents to take the petitioner into the strength of bsf as constable with all monetary benefits. 2. the petitioner joined border security force as constable on 08.12.2002 and was given training at rajasthan and posted at west bengal. he was sanctioned earned leave for 60 days from 04.01 ..... is also incorrect and unsustainable. furthermore, the writ petitioner failed to respond to all the communication sent by the respondents and finally filing of appeal provided under bsf act. having failed to avail the opportunities, now the petitioner cannot complain of any illegality. 11. in the result, the writ petition is dismissed. there is no ..... the impugned order. 6. the respondents had contended that the petitioner was given ample opportunity to report back to duty and as per section 62 of the bsf act and rules, court of enquiry was conducted and letter of apprehension was also given. subsequently, a show cause notice, dated 20.05.2006, was sent to the .....

Ramu Vs. the State

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2000CriLJ3412

..... section 43 of the act at this stage. section 42(1) of the act reads thus :-any such officer (being an officer superior in rank to a peon, sepoy or constable) of the departments of central excise, narcotics, customs, revenue intelligence or any other department of the central government, or of the border security force as is empowered in ..... an offence punishable under chapter iv has been committed, and, along with such drug or substance, any animal or conveyance or article liable to confiscation under this act, any document or other article which he has reason to believe may furnish evidence of the commission of an offence punishable under chapter iv relating to such ..... house, room enclosure, animal or conveyance, was aware of the fact that such place or conveyance was intended to be used for commission of an offence under the act. the insertion of the extra word 'knowingly', it must be presumed, has been intentionally used by the legislature.19. learned counsel for the appellant also relies .....

M.Suresh Kumar Vs. Union of India Rep. by Its Secretary and Others

Court : Chennai

..... union public service commission, (ii) the chief secretary to the government of tamil nadu, (iii) secretary, border management of the ministry of home affairs, new delhi; and (iv) the director general of central industrial security force, new delhi, met on 30.10.2012. after a great deal of deliberations, they forwarded their recommendation to ..... two years irrespective of his date of superannuation. the dgp may, however, be relieved of his responsibilities by the state government acting in consultation with the state security commission consequent upon any action taken against him under the all india services (discipline and appeal) rules or following his conviction in ..... second contention is also rejected. 22. third contention: the third contention revolves around an information received by the petitioner under the right to information act. it would be useful to extract the question raised by the petitioner and the reply given by the deputy secretary cum central public information officer of .....