Court : Karnataka
..... provision. however, the legislature has also intended that all acquisition proceedings which had not been concluded even after five years prior to the 2013 act coming into force, are deemed to have lapsed. provided the conditions prescribed therein could be applied to such acquisitions. a significant condition prescribed is that possession ..... bangalore development authority (2011) 3 scc 139, as contended by the respondents are made applicable to the instant case upon the coming into force of the land acquisition act, 2013, the same would lead to various anomalies and discriminations amongst land owners, more so when the supreme curt in munithimmiah and offshore ..... process. acquisition under urgency clause has also been limited for the purposes of national defence, security purposes and rehabilitation and resettlement needs in the event of emergencies or natural calamities only. 12. to ensure food security, multi-crop irrigated land shall be acquired only as a last resort measure. an equivalent .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... provision. however, the legislature has also intended that all acquisition proceedings which had not been concluded even after five years prior to the 2013 act coming into force, are deemed to have lapsed. provided the conditions prescribed therein could be applied to such acquisitions. a significant condition prescribed is that possession ..... 94 bangalore development authority (2011) 3 scc139 as contended by the respondents are made applicable to the instant case upon the coming into force of the land acquisition act, 2013, the same would lead to various anomalies and discriminations amongst land owners, more so when the supreme curt in munithimmiah and offshore ..... process. acquisition under urgency clause has also been limited for the purposes of national defence, security purposes and rehabilitation and resettlement needs in the event of emergencies or natural calamities only.12. to ensure food security, multi-crop irrigated land shall be acquired only as a last resort measure. an equivalent .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... appeal by the convicted accused. 2. case of the prosecution in brief is that, the deceased, accused, complainant (pw.1), complainant's son and another were working as security guards in ivrcl cement concrete mixing factory; the deceased and accused were working in the day shift, whereas the complainant, his son and another were working in the night shift ..... saw the dead body just outside the concrete mixing factory; the head of the deceased was completely smashed, the deceased was wearing the uniform provided to him by the security agency; looking to the uniform of the deceased, the complainant identified the dead body as that of the deceased and he searched for the accused, but his whereabouts were ..... whereas pw.7 is the witness for recovery of cash under panchanama at ex.p7. pw.7 has deposed that the police called him on 17.3.2009 to act as pancha and accordingly, he went along with the police to the room wherein the accused was staying; at that point of time, the accused was staying in the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... split-up against accused no.1, as he had absconded during the pendency of the case before the court below. the presence of the said accused having been secured after the trial and conviction of accused no.2 to 4 in case no.sc3782011, a fresh trial was conducted in so far as the appellant was concerned. ..... it is not true that my son and i were also involved in keeping the police in confinement. sadashiv dange suspected us of having informed the police about his acts. after the said incident, a police van was regularly stationed at itnal village. we were released on bail. we are shepherds (kurubas) by caste. the majority of ..... furtherance of their common intention the accused channappa mutnal contravened the conditions of licence of revolver and thereby committed an offence punishable under section 30 of the indian arms act?. the above were answered in the affirmative and the accused were convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment and fine for the offence punishable under section 302, apart .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... at a finding of guilt, on the basis of the above evidence, which cannot be faulted. in the second trial, after the presence of accused no. 1 was secured, apart from the evidence of the complainant, examined as pw-1, one hussain paschapur who was examined as pw-2 at both the trials, and who had flatly ..... furtherance of their common intention the accused channappa mutnal contravened the conditions of licence of revolver and thereby committed an offence punishable under section 30 of the indian arms act? ? the above were answered in the affirmative and the accused were convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment and fine for the offence punishable under section 302, apart ..... accused for offences punishable under sections 302 and 201 of the indian penal code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as the ipcfor brevity) and section 30 of the arms act, 1959. the accused are said to have pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. the prosecution had then examined 36 witnesses and had got marked several .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... defendant alone was cultivating the land as a tenant. the land vested in the state government after the land reforms amendment act, 1961 came into force in the year 1974. he filed form no.7-a before the competent authority for grant of land. at the time ..... continued to be in actual possession and cultivation of such land on the date of commencement of the karnataka land reforms (amendment) act, 1997, was entitled to make an application for grant of land. the deputy commissioner or any other officer authorized by the state ..... family? 12. the tenancy under the land reforms act is heritable, which is clear from section 24 of the act. it is manifest from section 44 as amended by act no.1/1974, which has come into force from 1.3.1974 that all lands held by ..... or in possession of the tenant immediately prior to the date of commencement of the said amendment act, other .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... first defendant about 25 years back. the first defendant alone was cultivating the land as a tenant. the land vested in the state government after the land reforms amendment act, 1961 came into force in the year 1974. he filed form no.7-a before the competent authority for grant of land. at the time of filing of the application, his family ..... to the exclusion of other members of the family?. 11 12. the tenancy under the land reforms act is heritable, which is clear from section 24 of the act. it is manifest from section 44 as amended by act no.1/1974, which has come into force from 1.3.1974 that all lands held by or in possession of the tenant immediately prior ..... to the date of commencement of the said amendment act, other than the lands held by them under the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... the taluk panchayat: provided that,- (a) the disqualification in clause (d) will cease to operate after the expiry of the period during which a person is ordered to furnish security; (b) the disqualification in clauses (c), (e), or (f) will cease to operate after the expiry of five years from the date of such sentence, dismissal ..... being chosen and for being member of a taluk panchayat,- (a) if he is so disqualified by or under any law for the time being in force for the purposes of the elections to the state legislature: provided that no person shall be disqualified on the ground that he is less than twenty five years ..... shivamurthy are repeatedly being given contracts for carrying out works under the panchayath. therefore, she should be disqualified under section 128(1) of the karnataka panchayath raj act, 1993 ( the act', for short). 3. subsequently, a notice was issued to the petitioner. the petitioner did appear before the election commissioner, and filed her reply to the application .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... the taluk panchayat: provided that,- (a) the disqualification in clause (d) will cease to operate after the expiry of the period during which a person is ordered to furnish security; (b) the disqualification in clauses (c), (e), or (f) will cease to operate after the expiry of five years from the date of such sentence, dismissal or ..... for being chosen and for being member of a taluk panchayat,- (a) if he is so disqualified by or under any law for the time being in force for the purposes of the elections to the state legislature: provided that no person shall be disqualified on the ground that he is less than twenty five years, ..... are repeatedly being given contracts for carrying out works under the 3 panchayath. therefore, she should be disqualified under section 128 (1) of the karnataka panchayath raj act, 1993 ( the act , for short).3. subsequently, a notice was issued to the petitioner. the petitioner did appear before the election commissioner, and filed her reply to the application. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi
..... the accused by the trial court.3. pw.11-mr. mahantayya has lodged the first information report as per ex.p16 stating that, he has been working in border security force at kolkata. his father by name panchayya has a landed property in survey no.77 measuring 1 acre 39 guntas situated at koutha-k village, aurad taluk, bidar district ..... registered a case in crime no.1/2001 for the offences punishable under sections 7 and 13(1) (d) of the p.c. act, 1988 and taken-up investigation. the investigating officer after securing the panch-witnesses to his office conducted a pre-trap mahazar as per ex.p13, in order to lay a trap against the accused. ..... . therefore, broadly speaking, the expression gratification used in section-7 means illegal or corrupt means of receiving money as used in section 13(1)(d) of the act includes all types of satisfaction or desire of the accused sought to be fulfilled by the complainant. anything which gives satisfaction to the recipient other than the legal remuneration .....
Tag this Judgment!