Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: border security force act 1968 section 104 order for custody and disposal of property pending trial Sorted by: recent Court: karnataka kalaburagi

Apr 29 2015 (HC)

Mahalingappa s/o.amareshwarappa Mathapathi Vs. The State Through Lokay ...

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

..... the accused by the trial court.3. pw.11-mr. mahantayya has lodged the first information report as per ex.p16 stating that, he has been working in border security force at kolkata. his father by name panchayya has a landed property in survey no.77 measuring 1 acre 39 guntas situated at koutha-k village, aurad taluk, bidar district ..... registered a case in crime no.1/2001 for the offences punishable under sections 7 and 13(1) (d) of the p.c. act, 1988 and taken-up investigation. the investigating officer after securing the panch-witnesses to his office conducted a pre-trap mahazar as per ex.p13, in order to lay a trap against the accused. ..... . therefore, broadly speaking, the expression gratification used in section-7 means illegal or corrupt means of receiving money as used in section 13(1)(d) of the act includes all types of satisfaction or desire of the accused sought to be fulfilled by the complainant. anything which gives satisfaction to the recipient other than the legal remuneration .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //