Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: border security force act 1968 section 104 order for custody and disposal of property pending trial Court: karnataka Page 21 of about 253 results (0.086 seconds)

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Smt Parvathamma Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... with a view to prohibit the activities of land grabbing and to provide for matters connected therewith has proposed to bring the karnataka land grabbing (prohibition) act into force. apart from declaring land grabbing as unlawful, the state government desires to prohibit land grabbing. therefore, it is proposed to provide for penalty for offences ..... keep the statute within the competence of legislature. 39310. a statute is designed to be workable, and the interpretation thereof by a court should be to secure that object, unless crucial omission or clear direction makes that end unattainable. in the matter of fawcett properties ltd. vs. buckingham county council reported in (1960 ..... uncultivable land. though respondent no.2 herein has contended that the documents relied upon by petitioner is false and in collusion with revenue officials, records secured by special court from the revenue authorities clearly indicated that the register of index of land form no.6 at page no.139 pertain to sy.no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri. K. R. Chandre Gowda Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... with a view to prohibit the activities of land grabbing and to provide for matters connected therewith has proposed to bring the karnataka land grabbing (prohibition) act into force. apart from declaring land grabbing as unlawful, the state government desires to prohibit land grabbing. therefore, it is proposed to provide for penalty for offences ..... keep the statute within the competence of legislature. 39310. a statute is designed to be workable, and the interpretation thereof by a court should be to secure that object, unless crucial omission or clear direction makes that end unattainable. in the matter of fawcett properties ltd. vs. buckingham county council reported in (1960 ..... uncultivable land. though respondent no.2 herein has contended that the documents relied upon by petitioner is false and in collusion with revenue officials, records secured by special court from the revenue authorities clearly indicated that the register of index of land form no.6 at page no.139 pertain to sy.no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Mr Joseph P Cherian Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... with a view to prohibit the activities of land grabbing and to provide for matters connected therewith has proposed to bring the karnataka land grabbing (prohibition) act into force. apart from declaring land grabbing as unlawful, the state government desires to prohibit land grabbing. therefore, it is proposed to provide for penalty for offences ..... keep the statute within the competence of legislature. 39310. a statute is designed to be workable, and the interpretation thereof by a court should be to secure that object, unless crucial omission or clear direction makes that end unattainable. in the matter of fawcett properties ltd. vs. buckingham county council reported in (1960 ..... uncultivable land. though respondent no.2 herein has contended that the documents relied upon by petitioner is false and in collusion with revenue officials, records secured by special court from the revenue authorities clearly indicated that the register of index of land form no.6 at page no.139 pertain to sy.no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Eerappa Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... with a view to prohibit the activities of land grabbing and to provide for matters connected therewith has proposed to bring the karnataka land grabbing (prohibition) act into force. apart from declaring land grabbing as unlawful, the state government desires to prohibit land grabbing. therefore, it is proposed to provide for penalty for offences ..... keep the statute within the competence of legislature. 39310. a statute is designed to be workable, and the interpretation thereof by a court should be to secure that object, unless crucial omission or clear direction makes that end unattainable. in the matter of fawcett properties ltd. vs. buckingham county council reported in (1960 ..... uncultivable land. though respondent no.2 herein has contended that the documents relied upon by petitioner is false and in collusion with revenue officials, records secured by special court from the revenue authorities clearly indicated that the register of index of land form no.6 at page no.139 pertain to sy.no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri H M Muninarayana Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... with a view to prohibit the activities of land grabbing and to provide for matters connected therewith has proposed to bring the karnataka land grabbing (prohibition) act into force. apart from declaring land grabbing as unlawful, the state government desires to prohibit land grabbing. therefore, it is proposed to provide for penalty for offences ..... keep the statute within the competence of legislature. 39310. a statute is designed to be workable, and the interpretation thereof by a court should be to secure that object, unless crucial omission or clear direction makes that end unattainable. in the matter of fawcett properties ltd. vs. buckingham county council reported in (1960 ..... uncultivable land. though respondent no.2 herein has contended that the documents relied upon by petitioner is false and in collusion with revenue officials, records secured by special court from the revenue authorities clearly indicated that the register of index of land form no.6 at page no.139 pertain to sy.no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri G H Nagaraj Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... with a view to prohibit the activities of land grabbing and to provide for matters connected therewith has proposed to bring the karnataka land grabbing (prohibition) act into force. apart from declaring land grabbing as unlawful, the state government desires to prohibit land grabbing. therefore, it is proposed to provide for penalty for offences ..... keep the statute within the competence of legislature. 39310. a statute is designed to be workable, and the interpretation thereof by a court should be to secure that object, unless crucial omission or clear direction makes that end unattainable. in the matter of fawcett properties ltd. vs. buckingham county council reported in (1960 ..... uncultivable land. though respondent no.2 herein has contended that the documents relied upon by petitioner is false and in collusion with revenue officials, records secured by special court from the revenue authorities clearly indicated that the register of index of land form no.6 at page no.139 pertain to sy.no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

C. T. Nanaiah Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... with a view to prohibit the activities of land grabbing and to provide for matters connected therewith has proposed to bring the karnataka land grabbing (prohibition) act into force. apart from declaring land grabbing as unlawful, the state government desires to prohibit land grabbing. therefore, it is proposed to provide for penalty for offences ..... keep the statute within the competence of legislature. 39310. a statute is designed to be workable, and the interpretation thereof by a court should be to secure that object, unless crucial omission or clear direction makes that end unattainable. in the matter of fawcett properties ltd. vs. buckingham county council reported in (1960 ..... uncultivable land. though respondent no.2 herein has contended that the documents relied upon by petitioner is false and in collusion with revenue officials, records secured by special court from the revenue authorities clearly indicated that the register of index of land form no.6 at page no.139 pertain to sy.no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

T M Virupakshaiah Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... with a view to prohibit the activities of land grabbing and to provide for matters connected therewith has proposed to bring the karnataka land grabbing (prohibition) act into force. apart from declaring land grabbing as unlawful, the state government desires to prohibit land grabbing. therefore, it is proposed to provide for penalty for offences ..... keep the statute within the competence of legislature. 39310. a statute is designed to be workable, and the interpretation thereof by a court should be to secure that object, unless crucial omission or clear direction makes that end unattainable. in the matter of fawcett properties ltd. vs. buckingham county council reported in (1960 ..... uncultivable land. though respondent no.2 herein has contended that the documents relied upon by petitioner is false and in collusion with revenue officials, records secured by special court from the revenue authorities clearly indicated that the register of index of land form no.6 at page no.139 pertain to sy.no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Mr Irfan Razack Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... with a view to prohibit the activities of land grabbing and to provide for matters connected therewith has proposed to bring the karnataka land grabbing (prohibition) act into force. apart from declaring land grabbing as unlawful, the state government desires to prohibit land grabbing. therefore, it is proposed to provide for penalty for offences ..... keep the statute within the competence of legislature. 39310. a statute is designed to be workable, and the interpretation thereof by a court should be to secure that object, unless crucial omission or clear direction makes that end unattainable. in the matter of fawcett properties ltd. vs. buckingham county council reported in (1960 ..... uncultivable land. though respondent no.2 herein has contended that the documents relied upon by petitioner is false and in collusion with revenue officials, records secured by special court from the revenue authorities clearly indicated that the register of index of land form no.6 at page no.139 pertain to sy.no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Smt Parvathi Nachiappan Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... with a view to prohibit the activities of land grabbing and to provide for matters connected therewith has proposed to bring the karnataka land grabbing (prohibition) act into force. apart from declaring land grabbing as unlawful, the state government desires to prohibit land grabbing. therefore, it is proposed to provide for penalty for offences ..... keep the statute within the competence of legislature. 39310. a statute is designed to be workable, and the interpretation thereof by a court should be to secure that object, unless crucial omission or clear direction makes that end unattainable. in the matter of fawcett properties ltd. vs. buckingham county council reported in (1960 ..... uncultivable land. though respondent no.2 herein has contended that the documents relied upon by petitioner is false and in collusion with revenue officials, records secured by special court from the revenue authorities clearly indicated that the register of index of land form no.6 at page no.139 pertain to sy.no .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //