Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: border security force act 1968 section 104 order for custody and disposal of property pending trial Court: gujarat Page 1 of about 5 results (0.410 seconds)

Feb 09 2005 (HC)

Gajaji Gopalji Jadeja Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2005)2GLR1142

..... anti-national elements were being readied to infiltrate through the rann and the coastal area of kachchh district, the petitioners were employed to assist the border security force personnel for containing any infiltration during such times. during kachchh earthquake, the petitioners had been mobilised to help non-governmental organisations and ordinary people in ..... are required to work all round the year.(iii) it was denied that the services of the petitioners are not comparable with those of the border security force personnel.(iv) it was also stated that by the very nature of their appointment as home guards, petitioners are liable to be embodied when the ..... residing within 50 kilometres of the kachchh border. there is no such area requirement for recruitment of ordinary home guards under the bombay home guards act, 1947 and the rules framed thereunder.26.1 the petitioners are concerned with national security as they are a paramilitary force whereas the ordinary home guards are concerned .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 25 2004 (HC)

Ongc Labour Union Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : [2004(102)FLR461]; (2005)3GLR1941

..... one of them with and the other without the necessities of the job, facilities and benefits of the service.' the claim of bwhg for parity with bsf (border security force) personnel was rejected. but, there being no real distinction between the permanent bwhg and the part-time bwhg, the hon'ble supreme court upheld the decision ..... transfers are regulated by the corporation. mr.sahani has submitted that the corporation is, under the provisions of the act of 1952, obliged to deduct the amount of provident fund from the wages of these security guards and to deposit the same with the provident fund authorities. the corporation, however, has failed to perform its ..... report'. on receipt of the failure report, the appropriate government was under a bounden duty to refer the dispute to the tribunal under section 10(1) of the act of 1947. however, the appropriate government, by its impugned communication dated 28th november, 1984, opined that, 'there is no relation between the oil & natural gas .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 28 2006 (HC)

State of Gujarat Vs. Jaman Haji Mamad Jat and 3 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 2007CriLJ1584; (2007)2GLR1165

..... judgment.7. short facts of the prosecution case are as under:1. the border security force ('bsf' for short) was keeping more vigil and watch in the months of may and june, 1999 in the open border area of kutch district, gujarat state, connecting pakistan border particularly in view of ongoing kargil war. on 1-6-1999, bsf khura ..... investigation, they recorded statements of various witnesses and also investigated towards the local people i.e. indian nationals staying very near to the border whose names were disclosed during investigation with their act and, therefore, some of them were arrested also and statements of various witnesses were recorded. raid was carried out at the house ..... press. this witness granted sent letter dated 30.08.1999 for sanction to the home department and letter dated 24.08.1999 for granting sanction under arms act and explosives act.xli. p.w.41, dilipbhai shantilal mehta, police inspector, l.c.b., first i.o., ex.290. this witness wrote letters to fsl for examination .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 05 1989 (HC)

Aslambhai Ibrahimbhai Memon and anr. Vs. the State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 1990CriLJ1787; (1990)1GLR150

..... the official gazette, invest any officer of the department of central excise, narcotics, customs, revenue intelligence or border security force or any class of such officer with the powers of an officer-in-charge of a police station for the investigation of the offence under this act.(2) the state government may, by notification published in the official gazette, invest any officer of the ..... state government to invest any officer of the department of central excise, narcotice, customs, revenue intelligence or border security force or any class of such officers with the powers of an officer-in-charge of a police station for purposes of investigating the offences under the act. same is the position under sub-section (2) which empowers the state government to invest any officer .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 01 2003 (HC)

MunruddIn WajiruddIn Kazi Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2003)4GLR781

..... , invest any officer of the department of central excise, narcotics, customs, revenue intelligence or border security force or any class of such officers with the powers of an officer-in-charge of a police station for the investigation of the offences under this act.(2) the state government may, by notification published in the official gazette, invest any officer ..... of sub-sec.(2) of sec. 41 of the said act is concerned, it has been mentioned therein that any such officer of gazetted rank of the departments of central excise, narcotics, customs, revenue intelligence or any other department of the central government or of the border security force as is empowered in this behalf by general or special ..... (61 of 1985) and in supersession of all previous orders or notifications, issued under sec.22 of the dangerous drugs act, 1930 (ii of 1930) and in force in any part of the state, the government of gujarat hereby invests the following officers with the powers of an officer, in charge of a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 13 1995 (HC)

Dhanpalsingh Barunsingh Thakur and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 1995CriLJ3751; (1996)1GLR219

..... such officer of gazetted rank of the departments of central excise, narcotics, customs, revenue, intelligence or any other department of the central government or of the border security force as is empowered in this behalf by general or special order by the central government, or any such officer of the revenue, drugs, control, excise, police ..... to take measures for preventing and combating abuse of an illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and to appoint authorities and officers to exercise the powers under the act. the provisions in chapter iii deal with prohibition, control and regulation of cultivation of coca plant, opium, poppy, etc. and to regulate the possession, ..... , the expert has opined that the substance sent to him is charas. the question is whether charas found by expert is a 'charas' as defined in ndps act. under section 293 criminal procedure code, opinion of the expert is admissible in evidence. however, at the request of the defence counsel, the expert was presented for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 22 1990 (HC)

State of Gujarat Vs. Abdulrasid Ibrahim Mansuri

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1990)2GLR947

..... p.s. act provides for the power of entry, search, seizure and arrest without warrant or authorisation. any officer (being an officer superior in rank to a peon, sepoy or constable) of the departments of central excise, narcotics, customs, revenue intelligence or any other department of the central government or of the border security force as is empowered ..... to law of such person or article. so far as dealing with such person is concerned, the officer is charge of the police station may either secure police custody remand or send such person to judicial custody under the provisions of the criminal procedure code. so far as the articles, which are produced before the ..... parcel. in that case, the prosecution had not adduced any evidence to establish that the accused was knowingly in possession of the opium. the accused had secured endorsement on the railway receipt from the consignee and presented it before the parcel clerk and obtained the parcel. there was no evidence that the accused was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 22 1990 (HC)

Surajmal Kanaiyalal Soni Vs. the State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 1991CriLJ1483; (1990)2GLR923

..... . section 42, ndps act, provides for the power of entry, search, seizure and arrest without warrant or authorisation. any officer (being an officer superior in rank to a peon, sepoy or constable) of the departments of central excise, narcotics, customs, revenue intelligence or any other department of the central government or of the border security force as is empowered ..... record it may not be easily possible to tamper with the evidence or create evidence. the very fact that the first information report is made is sufficient security and after that there may not be any possibility for changing the record. in such circumstances, it should be held that even though compliance of that section ..... arrest the accused nor could he conduct the search in violation of the relevant provisions contained in chapter v nor the opium recovered (had?) been seized or secured in the manner provided for in the said chapter. it is also observed that :'it hardly need be emphasised that if the power of the special or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 13 2003 (HC)

Sajjansing @ Raju Jagdishsinh Pawar Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2004)1GLR676

..... per sub-section (2) of section 41 of the n.d.p.s. act any such officer of gazetted rank of the departments of central excise, narcotics, customs, revenue intelligence or any other department of the central government or of the border security force as is empowered in this behalf by general or special order by the central government or any other departments ..... (61 of 1985) and in supersession of all previous orders or notifications issued under sec.22 of the dangerous drugs act, 1930 (ii of 1930) and in force in any part of the state, the government of gujarat hereby empowers for the purpose of the said sub-sec. (2) of the following officers of the state government, namely :- ..... (61 of 1985) and in supersession of all previous orders or notifications, issued under sec.22 of the dangerous drugs act, 1930 (ii of 1930 and in force in any part of the state, the government of gujarat hereby invests the following officers with the powers of an officer, in charge of a police station within the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 08 2003 (HC)

Abdul Salam Yusufbhai Shaikh Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2003)2GLR1643

..... p.s. act reads as follows :'section 42 : power of entry, search, seizure and arrest without warrant or authorisation :- (1) any such officer (being an officer superior in rank to a peon, sepoy or constable) of the departments of central excise, narcotics, customs, revenue intelligence or any other department of the central government or of the border security force as is ..... (lxi of 1985) and in suppression of all previous orders or notifications issued under section 22 of the dangerous drugs act, 1930 (ii of 1930) and in force in any part of the state, the government of gujarat hereby empowers for the purpose of the said sub-section (2) of the following officers of the state ..... (lxi of 1985) and in supersession of all previous orders or notifications, issued under section 22 of the dangerous drugs act, 1930 (ii of 1930) and in force in any part of the state, the government of gujarat hereby invests the following officers with the powers of an officer, in charge of a police station .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //