Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bombay prohibition act 1949 maharashtra section 24a this chapter not to apply to certain articles Court: mumbai aurangabad

Nov 02 2012 (HC)

Arif Ali S/O Yusuf Ali Sayyed Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... 2006 (2) mh.l.j. (cri.) 855, which is as follows:- the charge of offence punishable under section 66(1)(b) of the bombay prohibition act or section 117 of the motor vehicles act, for which imprisonment prescribed is less than one year, was sought to be added seventeen years after the incident. this amounts to persecution and not prosecution ..... for himself or for any other person, any gratification whatever, other than legal remuneration, as a motive or reward for doing or forbearing to do any official act or for showing or forbearing to show, in the exercise of his official functions, favour or disfavour to any person or for rendering or attempting to render any ..... in the said charge by altering the said charge. 10] learned counsel for the petitioner further argued that the definition of section 7 of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 contemplates that, whoever, being, or expecting to be a public servant, accepts or obtains or agrees to accept or attempts to obtain from any person, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 15 2013 (HC)

Vijay Vs. State of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary Home Department a ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... when the order of externment was in force, he entered the prohibited area and invited action under section 142 of the bombay police act, giving rise to crime no.i-35/2012. the later offence speaks of mindset of the petitioner; disrespect and reek of arrogance ..... petitioner is apparently involved with offences of cheating, deception, forgery, preparing false documents; assault to an individual; intimidation; threat and infraction of section 135 of the bombay police act. he has not even spared government officials and faced the brunt for offence under section 353 and 186 of indian penal code. 12. added to it is, ..... against the law and order. he vividly and brazenly, in spite of prohibitory orders, against him, crossed the limits of prohibited areas. this was to demonstrate .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 17 2012 (HC)

Santosh Govind Mahajan Vs. State of Maharashtra and Another

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... is intended to give effect to the resolutions passed by the legislatures of the aforesaid states." apart from above, the provisions of section 189 of the bombay provincial municipal corporations act, 1949, cast duty upon the state and in particular, in the present case, respondent no.2, to supply potable water to the citizens of aurangabad. apart ..... contents of the said affidavits, at this juncture, it would be appropriate to refer to some of the provisions of the constitution and also the bombay provincial municipal corporations act,1949 and also the judgments of the supreme court and this court, which cast a duty upon the respondents and in particular, respondent no.2 ..... standard of living of its people and the improvement of public health as among its primary duties and, in particular, the state shall endeavour to bring about prohibition of the consumption, except for medical purposes of intoxicating drinks and of drugs which are injurious to health." 3. equally, the citizens owe the duty .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 17 2012 (HC)

Santosh Govind Mahajan Vs. State of Maharashtra and Another

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... is intended to give effect to the resolutions passed by the legislatures of the aforesaid states." apart from above, the provisions of section 189 of the bombay provincial municipal corporations act, 1949, cast duty upon the state and in particular, in the present case, respondent no.2, to supply potable water to the citizens of aurangabad. apart ..... contents of the said affidavits, at this juncture, it would be appropriate to refer to some of the provisions of the constitution and also the bombay provincial municipal corporations act,1949 and also the judgments of the supreme court and this court, which cast a duty upon the respondents and in particular, respondent no.2 ..... standard of living of its people and the improvement of public health as among its primary duties and, in particular, the state shall endeavour to bring about prohibition of the consumption, except for medical purposes of intoxicating drinks and of drugs which are injurious to health." 3. equally, the citizens owe the duty .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 09 2016 (HC)

Ambadas and Others Vs. Exide Industries Limited and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... emphasis is on the words "where such a union is not a recognised union". it clearly suggests that unless the union is recognized under the act, the employer is strictly prohibited from interfering with or supporting to any of the unions either by show of partiality or favouritism, the whole idea being that the employer should treat ..... thirty per cent of the total number of employees employed in any undertaking. the application has to be made to the industrial court set up under the bombay industrial relations act. on receipt of the application, the industrial court has to cause a notice to be displayed on the notice board of the undertaking, declaring its ..... , therefore, the sole bargaining agent in respondent no.1 factory. 16. the learned division bench of this court, in the matter of maharashtra state road transport corporation, bombay and others vs. maharashtra motor kamgar federation, nagpur and another, 1986 labour and industrial cases 253 : 1985 mh.l.j. 802, has dealt with the menace of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 05 2012 (HC)

Ashok @ Aau S/O Pitambar Choudhary and Another Vs. the State of Mahara ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... or are permitted to have access, or in any race course under clause (a) or section 12 or under section 12a of the bombay prevention of gambling act, 1887; or (b) twice or more of an offence under the bombay prohibition act, 1949 not being an offence under section 65, 66a and 68 or; [b-a] twice or more of an offence under section 3 or ..... certain offences:- [(1)] if a person has been convicted - (a) (i) of an offence under chapter xii, xvi, xvii of the indian penal code, 1949 ; or (ii) of any offence under section 65, 66a or 68 of the bombay prohibition act, 1949 ; or (iii) of an offence under section 3,4,5,6, or 9 of the suppression of immoral traffic in women and girls ..... , act 1956 ; or (iv) of an offence under section 135 of the customs act, 1962; or (v) of an offence under section 4, or for accepting .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 18 2015 (HC)

Gnyanoba Tejrao Hake Vs. The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secreta ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... that, an offence was registered against the petitioner in police station sadar bazar, jalna, vide c.r.no. 3013/2000 under section 12-a of the prevention of bombay gambling act dated 22.01.2000 and the charge sheet was filed against the petitioner vide s.t.c.no. 1053/2000 in jmfc court, jalna and the matter was ..... after enquiry it was noticed by respondent no.3 that, the crime is registered against the petitioner vide cr no. 3013/2000 under section 12 (a) of the bombay prevention of gambling act on 22.01.2000. it is further stated that, this clearly shows that, the petitioner has purposely hidden the said fact in the sakshankan namuna form . it ..... find out the reasons for termination of his services. he was orally told that, one crime was registered against the petitioner under section 12-a of the bombay prevention of gambling act and at the time of submitting the application, which was in prescribed form in the column. the petitioner was supposed to disclose information in said column about .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 05 2012 (HC)

Ashok @ Aau S/O Pitambar Choudhary and Another Vs. the State of Mahara ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... or are permitted to have access, or in any race course under clause (a) or section 12 or under section 12a of the bombay prevention of gambling act, 1887; or (b) twice or more of an offence under the bombay prohibition act, 1949 not being an offence under section 65, 66a and 68 or; [b-a] twice or more of an offence under section 3 or ..... certain offences:- [(1)] if a person has been convicted - (a) (i) of an offence under chapter xii, xvi, xvii of the indian penal code, 1949 ; or (ii) of any offence under section 65, 66a or 68 of the bombay prohibition act, 1949 ; or (iii) of an offence under section 3,4,5,6, or 9 of the suppression of immoral traffic in women and girls ..... , act 1956 ; or (iv) of an offence under section 135 of the customs act, 1962; or (v) of an offence under section 4, or for accepting .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 20 2014 (HC)

Jaishri and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra, Through Its Secretary, Ur ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... india, the petitioners are challenging the constitutional validity of section 3 of the then bombay provincial municipal corporations act, 1949, now, the maharashtra municipal corporations act, 1949. 3. it is prayed that subsection (4) to section 3 of the bombay provincial municipal corporations act, 1949 and proviso to subclause (d) of subsection (1) to section 6 of ..... issued on 1st november, 2011, by the government of maharashtra, appointing the collector as administrator/authorized officer under section 452a of the then bombay provincial municipal corporations act, 1949. it is the case of the petitioners that they were busy in some meeting and particularly, on the subject of the water conservation and ..... the governor within the meaning of sub-article (1) of article 243q of the constitution in the field, then, the state government was not prohibited from issuing the notification specifying the urban area with a population of not less than 3 lakhs, as a larger urban area, within the meaning .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 23 2013 (HC)

Ananta Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... dowry and as to what constitutes dowry. the demand of scooter was made after the marriage and the apex court held that such demand falls under 'dowry' defined under dowry prohibition act. 18. in the case reported as [2013] acr 398 supreme court of india [indrajit sureshprasad bind and ors. vs. state of gujrat], the apex court has held that ..... case. there was the charge for offences punishable under sections 304-b and 498-a of i.p.c. though there was no separate charge for offences under dowry prohibition act, there is the evidence to show that there was an agreement of dowry and there was the demand of dowry. in the case reported as 2007 air scw 3219 ..... placed reliance on the case reported as all m.r. (cri)-2013-1-640 [sampat narayan hakevs. the state of maharashtra] and the judgment delivered by aurangabad bench of bombay high court in criminal appeal no. 217/2000 [jitendra baburao patil vs. the state of maharashtra]. the facts of both the cases are different. so the observations made by .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //