Bombay Prohibition Act 1949 Maharashtra Section 134 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: bombay prohibition act 1949 maharashtra section 134 Court: income tax appellate tribunal itat pune Year: 1987 Page 1 of about 5 results (1.783 seconds)income-tax Officer Vs. Novelty Wine Traders
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune
Decided on : Feb-04-1987
Reported in : (1987)21ITD377(Pune.)
would toe necessary to examine the relevant provisions of the bombay prohibition act 1949 and bombay foreign liquor rules 1953 briefly and umesh from being held liable for offence under the prohibition act in case such an offence is committed 16 the to get registration under section 185 of the income tax act 1961 the act 2 on behalf of the revenue shri defeating the provisions of law under the bombay prohibition act 1949 section 58 provides that the right title or interest under corresponding to rule 574 of u p excise exists in maharashtra thus the facts of the present case would be akin an action to defeat the purpose and provision of law section 23 of the indian contract act on this point as
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJairambhai D. Chauhan Vs. Assistant Controller of Estate
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune
Decided on : Feb-16-1987
Reported in : (1987)21ITD245(Pune.)
from the deceased who was on his death bed the bombay broker was contacted in july 1978 the arrangement for registration anyway since both sides have taken the appellate controller s order dated 21 7 1984 without murmur or protest one need of exemption granted under section 33 1 p of the act in the original assessments have not arisen as a result gold bonds also cannot constitute information for the purpose of section 59 21 the revaluation of shares attempted by the assistant
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTV N Sarpotdar Vs. Income-tax Officer.
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune
Decided on : Mar-06-1987
Reported in : (1987)23ITD22(Pune.)
trading corpn ltd v cit 1971 81 itr 777 the bombay high court has considered the capital receipt and the real reason to depart from thee ratio of that order that order having followed the decision in v s s v meenakshi sum money equivalent to the total amount of entertainment duty actually collected and credited to govt on the exhibition of a film at rs 4 04 925 as on 31 12 1949 he noted that the film had been exhibited only for of this i we now request the managing director of maharashtra sanskritik vikas mahamandal to release the amount equivalent to the ltd 1982 138 itr 1 fb where similar words in section 40a 5 have been taken as including cash payments he
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSapna Benefit Trust Vs. Income-tax Officer
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune
Decided on : Sep-14-1987
Reported in : (1988)24ITR249(Pune.)
mrs taramati s bafna died on 8 7 1979 in bombay and whereas she left a will dt 4 1 1979 the aac who found no reason to interfere with the order of the ito for the reasons given in the orders are really concerned is not whether in effect one trust actually come into existence but what is declared by the testatrix 15 shri roy then referred to the indian trusts act sections 5 and 6 of the trust act and submitted that
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM.R. Wagle Vs. First Wealth-tax Officer
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune
Decided on : Feb-19-1987
Reported in : (1987)21ITD562(Pune.)
prevailed before majority 7 taking us through the wto s order shri inamdar submitted that the wto has not appreciated the physically for a beneficiary to exist identification with reference to actual person or relationship on each of the valuation dates is beneficiary the wto was thus fully justified in holding that section 2 1 1 is applicable and that consequently wto could
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT