Court : Himachal Pradesh
..... in other words, his submission is that the matter had attained finality in the year 1990 after the re-partition and after the preparation of revenue records under section 31 of the himachal pradesh holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act' for brevity sake) and handing over of possession under section 32 of the act.3. mr. r.k. ..... their rights were further determined when the proceedings under the himachal pradesh holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1971 commenced in the year 1989 and culminated in the year 1990. ..... the respondents preferred revision petition under section 54 of the himachal pradesh holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1971 on 8.10.2003 before the director consolidation of holdings himachal pradesh. ..... parveen kumar has further contended that after the orders passed by the director consolidation of holdings on 9.1.2004 the possession was handed over to his clients on 13.6.2005.4. ..... this position could not be altered by the order passed by the director consolidation of holdings on 9.1.2004 after a period of more than thirteen years.10. ..... in that case, an application was filed by the land-owner under section 65 of the bombay land revenue code, 1879 for converting agricultural land to non-agricultural use. ..... state of maharashtra and ors. .....
Tag this Judgment!