Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bombay prevention of fragmentation and consilidation of holdings act 1947 chapter 1 preliminary Page 1 of about 6 results (0.247 seconds)

Patel Jividas Trikamdas and ors. Vs. Collector and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1997Guj121; (1996)2GLR688

..... amount for the development and for taking crops every year.3. the respondent no. 1, district collector, had initiated proceedings under the provisions of bombay prevention of fragmentation act, 1947 (act) in the year 1987, i.e. after 19 years for declaring the aforesaid sale transaction as invalid being in violation of ..... : (air 1969 sc 1297).5. the provisions of the bombay prevention of fragmentation and consolidation of holdings act, 1947 are designed to provide for prevention of fragmentation of agricultural holdings and for their consolidation. one of the important and underlying objects is to prevent fragmentation of agricultural holdings and provide for consolidation of agricultural holdings for ..... 8 provides that no land in any local area shall be transferred or partitioned so as to create a fragment. section 8aa which came to be inserted by amendment act of bombay, 61 of 1953 provides restriction on partition of land. section 9 of the act prescribes penalty fortransfer or partition .....

Ranjit Shripatrao Holkar (Since Deceased by His Heirs Mrs. Vijayadevi ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2005(1)BomCR403; 2004(4)MhLj842

..... to him, or(2) in such a manner as will result in a contravention of the provisions of the bombay prevention of fragmentation and consolidation of holdings act, 1947, or in making any part of the land leased a fragment within the meaning of that act, or(3) if the tenant has become a member of a co-operative ..... thereof cannot be surrendered in accordance with the provisions of section 15, the entire land or such portion thereof, as the case may be, notwithstanding that it is a fragment, shall be disposed of by sale to any person in the following order of priority (hereinafter called 'the priority list') :-(i) a co-operative farming society, ..... february 18, 1987. the proceedings have emanated from an application preferred by the landlord for possession of the suit lands under sections 14, 25 and 29 of the bombay tenancy and agricultural lands act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the act). the original petitioner is the successor-in-interest of the landlady malatibai shripatrao holkar, who was .....

Mansing Bajirao Sawant Vs. Waman Laxman Sawant

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1995(1)BomCR645

..... the case.27. the learned advocate for the appellant, however, urged before me that the plaintiff's plaint is not tenable in view of the provisions of the bombay prevention of fragmentation and consolidation of holdings act, 1947. he put reliance on sections 7 and 8 of the said act of 1947. if the provisions of sections 7 and 8 ..... quite clear that they do not support his contention. section 8 says that no land in any local area shall be transferred or partitioned so as to create a fragmentation. therefore, what is going to be passed is a decree for joint possession of 1/4th share in the suit properties which was mortgaged with the present appellant-defendant ..... and the decree is not going to partition or create any fragmentation in the present case. section 7 then says that no person shall transfer any fragmentation in respect of which a notice has been given under sub-section (2) of section 8 except to the owner of .....

Sambhaji Shripati Bankar (Since Deceased by L.Rs. Babai Sambhaji Banka ...

Court : Mumbai

..... rs. and ors. v. nivrutti krishna bhilare and ors. : 2001 (4) mh.l.j. 31, held that the powers under section 32(1) of the bombay prevention of fragmentation and consolidation of holdings act, 1947 are required to be exercised within reasonable period though no specific limitation is provided for. the absence of specific period of limitation will not ..... mahale v. vithal deo and ors. : air 1997 s.c. 2695. the apex court held that there is no specific limitation provided under section 21 of the bombay mamlatdar's court act, 1906. it is held that the eviction order could have been executed at any time. this authority is hardly of any relevance in the ..... limits under the provisions of the maharashtra ceiling on holdings act, 1961 (for short, 'the ceiling act'). the tribunal directed thereafter that appropriate action under section 32p of the bombay tenancy and agricultural lands act, 1948 (for short, 'the bt&al; act') may be taken. the deceased respondent no. 1 (landlord) did not take any action .....

Prakash Nathyaba Bhosale Vs. Laxman Ganaba Bhosale

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR2003Bom41; 2003(1)ALLMR1016; 2003(1)BomCR218

..... the tahsildar is illegal for various reasons including that it is contrary to the decree passed by the civil court as well as in contravention of provisions of bombay prevention of fragmentation and consolidation of holdings act, 1947 (hereinafter referred as 'the said act'). the petitioner also prayed for temporary injunction which was allowed by the trial ..... otherwise, or can be sub-divided whether under a decree or order of a civil court or any other competent authority or otherwise, so as to create a fragment, without the previous sanction of the collector. such sanction shall be given by the collector in such circumstances and subject to such conditions as may be prescribed. ..... those of the said act. section 8 of the said act provides that no land in any localarea shall be transferred or partitioned so as to create a fragment. section 8aa(1) provides that where by transfer, decree, succession or otherwise, two or more persons are entitled to shares in an undivided agricultural land in .....

Gulzar Khan Vs. Commissioner of Consolidation and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 76(1993)CLT161; 1993(II)OLR194

..... the preparation of maps and land registers chapter-iii deals with preparation of consolidation scheme, chapter-iv deals with enforcement of the scheme, chapter-v deals with prevention of fragmentation and the last one deals with miscellaneous provisions. the very scheme of the act does not show that this act regulates the right of the tenure of land ..... which this full bench is seized on a reference from a division bench, which is whether the power conferred by section 37 of the orissa consolidation of holdings and prevention of fragmentation of land act. 1972 (hereinafter called 'the act' ) would be available for exercise after a notification has been issued as contemplated by section 41(1) of ..... . 1984 bom. 131 in this regard.the apex court in an earlier decision reported in a.i.r. 1959 sc 459 (sri ram narain v. state of bombay) stated thus :'if the language of the enactment is clear and unambiguous it would not be legitimate for the courts to add any words thereto and evolve therefrom some .....