Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bombay police amendment act 2008 maharashtra section 5 repeal of mah ord ix of 2008 and saving Court: central administrative tribunal principal bench new delhi

Mar 25 2014 (TRI)

Mahatma Mahto, New Delhi Vs. New Delhi Municipal Council (Ndmc) Throug ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

..... bench of the bombay high court in subhash ganpatrao kabade case', that mahadeo koli was recognised for the first time in 1976 under amendment act, 1976, as scheduled tribe is not relatable to reality and an erroneous assumption made ..... is stated that after a gap of six years, from the date the petitioner relinquished charge of the office of the administrator, punjab wakf board, a memorandum dated 5th december, 2008 was received in the office of the central wakf council, containing charges against the petitioner, delay in initiating disciplinary proceedings is not one of the grounds taken in the petition for ..... this court under article 32 seeking a declaration that settibalija though was not declared to be scheduled tribe in maharashtra it was a scheduled tribe for the purpose of the constitution and that he was entitled to the admission into the medical college on the basis of his social status as ..... medical college, this court declared that subject to the law made by parliament under sub-section (2) of section 342, the tribes or tribal communities or parts of or groups within tribes or tribal communities specified by ..... and confiscated, thus, in the said case, the issue for consideration before the apex court was whether the caste to which the appellants belong was scheduled tribe or not in this backdrop their lordships viewed that each directorate should constitute a vigilance cell consisting of senior deputy superintendent of police as over-all in charge and such number of police .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //