Court : Karnataka
..... other words, the special court is attempting to sit in judgment over the orders passed by the special deputy commissioner under the inams abolition act and order passed by the jurisdictional land tribunal under the karnataka land reforms act by opining that such an order would not have been ..... inserted whereunder, claims relating to the land made by persons which are pending before said authorities on the date of commencement of the act, would be excluded from the purview of the act, namely, where applications have been filed under section 94a, 94b, 94c and 94cc of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964 as well as the applications filed under scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers (recognition of forest rights) act, 2006 are pending, proceedings if already ..... court. the high court may exercise, so far as may be applicable, all the powers conferred by the chapters xxix and xxx of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (central act 2 of 1974) on a high court as if, the special court were a court of sessions trying cases within the local limits of the jurisdictions of ..... neeta bhalla and another (6) (2012)5 scc661aneeta hada vs godfather travels and tours private limited (7) (2011)1 scc176pepsico india holdings private limited vs food inspector and another (8) (2014)16 scc1pooja ravinder devidasani vs state of maharashtra & another (9) (2018)2 gauhati law reports313state of assam, in ..... . municipal corporation of greater bombay and others and ..... . 1952 scr435: air1952sc123 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... other words, the special court is attempting to sit in judgment over the orders passed by the special deputy commissioner under the inams abolition act and order passed by the jurisdictional land tribunal under the karnataka land reforms act by opining that such an order would not have been ..... inserted whereunder, claims relating to the land made by persons which are pending before said authorities on the date of commencement of the act, would be excluded from the purview of the act, namely, where applications have been filed under section 94a, 94b, 94c and 94cc of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964 as well as the applications filed under scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers (recognition of forest rights) act, 2006 are pending, proceedings if already ..... court. the high court may exercise, so far as may be applicable, all the powers conferred by the chapters xxix and xxx of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (central act 2 of 1974) on a high court as if, the special court were a court of sessions trying cases within the local limits of the jurisdictions of ..... neeta bhalla and another (6) (2012)5 scc661aneeta hada vs godfather travels and tours private limited (7) (2011)1 scc176pepsico india holdings private limited vs food inspector and another (8) (2014)16 scc1pooja ravinder devidasani vs state of maharashtra & another (9) (2018)2 gauhati law reports313state of assam, in ..... . municipal corporation of greater bombay and others and ..... . 1952 scr435: air1952sc123 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... other words, the special court is attempting to sit in judgment over the orders passed by the special deputy commissioner under the inams abolition act and order passed by the jurisdictional land tribunal under the karnataka land reforms act by opining that such an order would not have been ..... inserted whereunder, claims relating to the land made by persons which are pending before said authorities on the date of commencement of the act, would be excluded from the purview of the act, namely, where applications have been filed under section 94a, 94b, 94c and 94cc of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964 as well as the applications filed under scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers (recognition of forest rights) act, 2006 are pending, proceedings if already ..... court. the high court may exercise, so far as may be applicable, all the powers conferred by the chapters xxix and xxx of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (central act 2 of 1974) on a high court as if, the special court were a court of sessions trying cases within the local limits of the jurisdictions of ..... neeta bhalla and another (6) (2012)5 scc661aneeta hada vs godfather travels and tours private limited (7) (2011)1 scc176pepsico india holdings private limited vs food inspector and another (8) (2014)16 scc1pooja ravinder devidasani vs state of maharashtra & another (9) (2018)2 gauhati law reports313state of assam, in ..... . municipal corporation of greater bombay and others and ..... . 1952 scr435: air1952sc123 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... other words, the special court is attempting to sit in judgment over the orders passed by the special deputy commissioner under the inams abolition act and order passed by the jurisdictional land tribunal under the karnataka land reforms act by opining that such an order would not have been ..... inserted whereunder, claims relating to the land made by persons which are pending before said authorities on the date of commencement of the act, would be excluded from the purview of the act, namely, where applications have been filed under section 94a, 94b, 94c and 94cc of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964 as well as the applications filed under scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers (recognition of forest rights) act, 2006 are pending, proceedings if already ..... court. the high court may exercise, so far as may be applicable, all the powers conferred by the chapters xxix and xxx of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (central act 2 of 1974) on a high court as if, the special court were a court of sessions trying cases within the local limits of the jurisdictions of ..... neeta bhalla and another (6) (2012)5 scc661aneeta hada vs godfather travels and tours private limited (7) (2011)1 scc176pepsico india holdings private limited vs food inspector and another (8) (2014)16 scc1pooja ravinder devidasani vs state of maharashtra & another (9) (2018)2 gauhati law reports313state of assam, in ..... . municipal corporation of greater bombay and others and ..... . 1952 scr435: air1952sc123 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... other words, the special court is attempting to sit in judgment over the orders passed by the special deputy commissioner under the inams abolition act and order passed by the jurisdictional land tribunal under the karnataka land reforms act by opining that such an order would not have been ..... inserted whereunder, claims relating to the land made by persons which are pending before said authorities on the date of commencement of the act, would be excluded from the purview of the act, namely, where applications have been filed under section 94a, 94b, 94c and 94cc of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964 as well as the applications filed under scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers (recognition of forest rights) act, 2006 are pending, proceedings if already ..... court. the high court may exercise, so far as may be applicable, all the powers conferred by the chapters xxix and xxx of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (central act 2 of 1974) on a high court as if, the special court were a court of sessions trying cases within the local limits of the jurisdictions of ..... neeta bhalla and another (6) (2012)5 scc661aneeta hada vs godfather travels and tours private limited (7) (2011)1 scc176pepsico india holdings private limited vs food inspector and another (8) (2014)16 scc1pooja ravinder devidasani vs state of maharashtra & another (9) (2018)2 gauhati law reports313state of assam, in ..... . municipal corporation of greater bombay and others and ..... . 1952 scr435: air1952sc123 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... other words, the special court is attempting to sit in judgment over the orders passed by the special deputy commissioner under the inams abolition act and order passed by the jurisdictional land tribunal under the karnataka land reforms act by opining that such an order would not have been ..... inserted whereunder, claims relating to the land made by persons which are pending before said authorities on the date of commencement of the act, would be excluded from the purview of the act, namely, where applications have been filed under section 94a, 94b, 94c and 94cc of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964 as well as the applications filed under scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers (recognition of forest rights) act, 2006 are pending, proceedings if already ..... court. the high court may exercise, so far as may be applicable, all the powers conferred by the chapters xxix and xxx of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (central act 2 of 1974) on a high court as if, the special court were a court of sessions trying cases within the local limits of the jurisdictions of ..... neeta bhalla and another (6) (2012)5 scc661aneeta hada vs godfather travels and tours private limited (7) (2011)1 scc176pepsico india holdings private limited vs food inspector and another (8) (2014)16 scc1pooja ravinder devidasani vs state of maharashtra & another (9) (2018)2 gauhati law reports313state of assam, in ..... . municipal corporation of greater bombay and others and ..... . 1952 scr435: air1952sc123 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... other words, the special court is attempting to sit in judgment over the orders passed by the special deputy commissioner under the inams abolition act and order passed by the jurisdictional land tribunal under the karnataka land reforms act by opining that such an order would not have been ..... inserted whereunder, claims relating to the land made by persons which are pending before said authorities on the date of commencement of the act, would be excluded from the purview of the act, namely, where applications have been filed under section 94a, 94b, 94c and 94cc of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964 as well as the applications filed under scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers (recognition of forest rights) act, 2006 are pending, proceedings if already ..... court. the high court may exercise, so far as may be applicable, all the powers conferred by the chapters xxix and xxx of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (central act 2 of 1974) on a high court as if, the special court were a court of sessions trying cases within the local limits of the jurisdictions of ..... neeta bhalla and another (6) (2012)5 scc661aneeta hada vs godfather travels and tours private limited (7) (2011)1 scc176pepsico india holdings private limited vs food inspector and another (8) (2014)16 scc1pooja ravinder devidasani vs state of maharashtra & another (9) (2018)2 gauhati law reports313state of assam, in ..... . municipal corporation of greater bombay and others and ..... . 1952 scr435: air1952sc123 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... other words, the special court is attempting to sit in judgment over the orders passed by the special deputy commissioner under the inams abolition act and order passed by the jurisdictional land tribunal under the karnataka land reforms act by opining that such an order would not have been ..... inserted whereunder, claims relating to the land made by persons which are pending before said authorities on the date of commencement of the act, would be excluded from the purview of the act, namely, where applications have been filed under section 94a, 94b, 94c and 94cc of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964 as well as the applications filed under scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers (recognition of forest rights) act, 2006 are pending, proceedings if already ..... court. the high court may exercise, so far as may be applicable, all the powers conferred by the chapters xxix and xxx of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (central act 2 of 1974) on a high court as if, the special court were a court of sessions trying cases within the local limits of the jurisdictions of ..... neeta bhalla and another (6) (2012)5 scc661aneeta hada vs godfather travels and tours private limited (7) (2011)1 scc176pepsico india holdings private limited vs food inspector and another (8) (2014)16 scc1pooja ravinder devidasani vs state of maharashtra & another (9) (2018)2 gauhati law reports313state of assam, in ..... . municipal corporation of greater bombay and others and ..... . 1952 scr435: air1952sc123 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... other words, the special court is attempting to sit in judgment over the orders passed by the special deputy commissioner under the inams abolition act and order passed by the jurisdictional land tribunal under the karnataka land reforms act by opining that such an order would not have been ..... inserted whereunder, claims relating to the land made by persons which are pending before said authorities on the date of commencement of the act, would be excluded from the purview of the act, namely, where applications have been filed under section 94a, 94b, 94c and 94cc of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964 as well as the applications filed under scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers (recognition of forest rights) act, 2006 are pending, proceedings if already ..... court. the high court may exercise, so far as may be applicable, all the powers conferred by the chapters xxix and xxx of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (central act 2 of 1974) on a high court as if, the special court were a court of sessions trying cases within the local limits of the jurisdictions of ..... neeta bhalla and another (6) (2012)5 scc661aneeta hada vs godfather travels and tours private limited (7) (2011)1 scc176pepsico india holdings private limited vs food inspector and another (8) (2014)16 scc1pooja ravinder devidasani vs state of maharashtra & another (9) (2018)2 gauhati law reports313state of assam, in ..... . municipal corporation of greater bombay and others and ..... . 1952 scr435: air1952sc123 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... other words, the special court is attempting to sit in judgment over the orders passed by the special deputy commissioner under the inams abolition act and order passed by the jurisdictional land tribunal under the karnataka land reforms act by opining that such an order would not have been ..... inserted whereunder, claims relating to the land made by persons which are pending before said authorities on the date of commencement of the act, would be excluded from the purview of the act, namely, where applications have been filed under section 94a, 94b, 94c and 94cc of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964 as well as the applications filed under scheduled tribes and other traditional forest dwellers (recognition of forest rights) act, 2006 are pending, proceedings if already ..... court. the high court may exercise, so far as may be applicable, all the powers conferred by the chapters xxix and xxx of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (central act 2 of 1974) on a high court as if, the special court were a court of sessions trying cases within the local limits of the jurisdictions of ..... neeta bhalla and another (6) (2012)5 scc661aneeta hada vs godfather travels and tours private limited (7) (2011)1 scc176pepsico india holdings private limited vs food inspector and another (8) (2014)16 scc1pooja ravinder devidasani vs state of maharashtra & another (9) (2018)2 gauhati law reports313state of assam, in ..... . municipal corporation of greater bombay and others and ..... . 1952 scr435: air1952sc123 .....
Tag this Judgment!