Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bombay khadi and village industries act 1960 maharashtra chapter vi miscellaneous Sorted by: old Page 4 of about 68 results (0.149 seconds)

P.G.F. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [2005]124CompCas201(P& H); (2004)4CompLJ288(P& H); [2004]55SCL165(Punj& Har)

..... /vendee pankaj karnatak is a resident of new delhi (in the union territory of delhi), whereas the land purchased by him is hundreds of miles away in village vellugudari (in the state of andhra pradesh). can pankaj karnatak the purchaser (of agricultural land from pgfl), be expected to be in a position to control ..... 444)'the apex court, in the aforesaid case concluded, that merely because a bank guarantee had been executed by the respondents at delhi and transmitted for performance to bombay, would not constitute a cause of action, so as to enable the respondents to initiate proceedings in the delhi high court.19. reliance was also placed by ..... be deemed to have jurisdiction to entertain the claim projected by the petitioners in the instant case. it is, therefore, reiterated, by learned counsel, that the bombay high court, within whose jurisdiction the impugned order was passed can only rightfully entertain the controversy in hand.16. it is pointed out, that a transfer petition bearing .....

Farrukhabad GramIn Bank Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Agra

Reported in : (2006)103ITD207Agra

..... extending credit facilities through implementation of various government sponsored schemes for social and economic upliftment of the weaker sections of the society and to small and marginal farmers, village artisans, landless labourers for the purpose of agriculture and allied activities, trade, commerce, etc. the assessee-bank is a scheduled commercial bank and is authorized to do ..... was that the order of the tribunal in the case of rayalaseema qramin bank (supra) pertains to slr as well as non-slr. the order of the bombay bench in the case of maharashtra state co-operative bank (supra) pertains to only non-slr and the observations on which reliance has been placed by the learned ..... only to the facts of these cases in which the judgment was given and the fact remains that in the facts, as placed earlier, their lordships of bombay high court held that no facts were investigated by any authority and the judgment was as such rendered on the facts available on record. considering the above .....

Oberoi Constructions Private Limited a Company Registered Under the Co ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR546; 2008(3)BomCR408; (2008)110BOMLR951

..... proclamation and enquiry. section 26 provides for prohibited acts in 'reserved forest'. section 27 provides for dereservation of the reserved forest. chapter iii deals with 'village forests' and chapter iv deals with 'protected forests'. then, comes chapter v which is titled 'of the control over forests and lands not being the property ..... pil no. 17 of 2002. on behalf of this intervenor submissions were canvassed by learned counsel mr.g.s.patel. the intervenors are action group called bombay environmental action group (beag for short). the state government and the forest department were given opportunity to file their affidavits.32. mr. nairman, learned senior ..... as the buildings under construction are concerned, respondent no. 4 the municipal corporation of brihan mumbai issued stop work notice under section 354a of the bombay municipal corporation act, 1888. these notices made a reference to the same communication from the second respondent i.e. state of maharashtra/deputy conservator of .....

Ashoka Kumar Thakur Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors. (Obc Judgment)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2008(56)BLJR1292; 2008(3)CTC97; [2008(3)JCR176(SC)]; JT2008(5)SC1; (2008)3MLJ1105(SC); 2008(5)SCALE1; (2008)6SCC1; 2008AIRSCW2899; 2008(3)Supreme331; 2008(2)LH(SC)1534

..... parliament desires that agrarian reform in a broad and comprehensive sense must be introduced in the interests of a very large section of indian citizens who live in villages and whose financial prospects are integrally connected with the pursuit of progressive agrarian policy. thus, if the pith and substance test is applied to the amendment made by ..... the constitution is conceptually different from 14th amendment to the american constitution as was noted in state of west bengal v. anwar ali sarkar : 1952crilj510 and state of bombay and anr. v. f.n. balsara 1952 scr 682. in anwar ali's case (supra) at pages 363 and 364 it was noted as follows:i find ..... that their recommendations were accepted.the rule of grammatical construction has been accepted in india before and after independence. in the state of travancore- cochin and ors. v. bombay company ltd., alleppey air 1952 s.c. 366, chief justice patanjali sastri delivering the judgment of the court, said:it remains only to point out that the .....

Barla Rami Reddy and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by Its ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(3)ALD752; 2008(3)ALT336

..... pradesh issued notification under section 13(1) of the madhya pradesh nagar tatha gram nivesh adhiniyam (act 23 of 1973) constituting indore planning area comprising 37 villages. two villages, viz., bicholi and kanadia, were not included in the said notification. in respect of the said notified area, the state government, by a notification, ..... learned counsel relied on the judgment of the supreme court in pune municipal corporation and anr. v. promoters and builders association and anr. : air2004sc3502 . and bombay dyeing and . v. bombay environmental action group and ors. 2006 (2) scj 705 : 2006 (3) supreme 49. in support of his contention that the word 'modifications' shall ..... such as ramachandrapuram, medchal, ghatkesar etc.in order to avoid the truck traffic entering the city and congesting the existing roads, major truck terminals are proposed on bombay road (nh no. 9) at kukatpally, second on bangalore route opposite to police academy (on nh no. 7) and the third on the vijayawada road .....

Smt. Selvi and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... prosecution discharges the said onus.93. these concerns have been recognised in indian as well as foreign judicial precedents. for instance, das gupta, j. had observed in state of bombay v. kathi kalu oghad : [1962] 3 scr 10, at pp. 43-44:. for long it has been generally agreed among those who have devoted serious thought to ..... to other persons in other situations does not call for decision in this case.'101. these observations were cited with approval by b.p. sinha, c.j. in state of bombay v. kathi kalu oghad and ors. : [1962] 3 scr 10, at pp. 26-28. in the minority opinion, das gupta, j. affirmed the same position, id. at ..... a society.174. coming to the cases cited before us, in state of maharashtra v. sheshappa dudhappa tambade air 1964 bom 253, the bombay high court had upheld the constitutionality of section 129a of the bombay prohibition act, 1949. this provision empowered prohibition officers and police personnel to produce a person for `medical examination', which could include the .....

K.T. Plantation Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... provisions of the existing land acquisition act 1894 and the impugned act. in support of his contentions learned counsel placed reliance on judgments of this court in gram panchayat of village jamalpur v. malwinder singh & others (1985) 3 scc 661; kaiser-i- hind pvt. ltd. & another v. national textile corporation (maharashtra north) ltd. ..... & another (1995) supp. 1 sc 596, this court examined whether section 69-a, introduced by the gujarat amendment act 8 of 1982 in the bombay land revenue code which dealt with vesting mines, minerals and quarries in lands held by persons including girasdars and barkhalidars in the state violated article 300a of the ..... act, 1950 (1951) 2 scr 747, rajnarain singh v. the chairman, patna admnistration committee, patna& another, air 1954 sc 569, vasantlal maganbhai sanjanwala v. state of bombay and ors. air 1961 sc 4, hamdard dawakhana (wakf) lal kuan, delhi & another v. union of india & others (1960) 2 scr 671. 18. learned .....

Sehajdhari Sikh Federation Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... should not be so indefinite as to amount to an abdication of the legislative function- schwartz american administrative law, page 21."; d. vasantlal maganbhai sanjanwala v. state of bombay and ors., air 1961 sc 4, carefully demarcates the duty of a court to hold a fair, generous and liberal construction of a statute as to whether the legislature ..... or `ordinary' meaning unless there are compelling reasons. it is desirable to follow rule of strict construction when the purpose of the statute needs it; i. indian express newspapers (bombay) pvt. ltd. and ors. v. union of india and ors., (1985) 1 scc 641 has been relied upon to reinforce that a piece of `subordinate legislation' can ..... of the act; (vi) in state of maharashtra v. narayan shamrao puranik, (1982) 2 scc 440 and (1982) 3 scc 519, section 51(3) of the bombay re-organization act, 1960 empowering chief justice of the high court to constitute more benches was interpreted to hold that there was no time limitation for the chief justice to .....

High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Vs. M/S. Atma Tube Products Ltd. a ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... regulate what is to follow, not the past .these principles have been laid down and reiterated in a string of decisions including in (i) keshavan madhava menot versus state of bombay, air 195.sc 128.(ii) arjan singh versus state of punjab, air 197.sc 703.(iii) ex.capt.kc arora & anr. versus state of haryana & ors.(1984) 3 scc 281 ..... taken by this court in smt. ram kaur s case; the patna high court in guru prasad yadav versus state of bihar, crl. app no.582 of 2011; and the bombay high court in balasaheb rangnath khade s case, and held that:- if the victim also happens to be complainant and the appeal is against acquittal, he is required to take ..... section 482 crpc no.5934 of 2012. contrary to it, (i) madhya pradesh high court in dharamveer singh tomar versus ram raj singh tomar, 2011(3) rcr (crl.) 607; (ii) bombay high court in shanta ram versus deepak, 2012(2) mhlj 39 as well as in (iii) balasaheb rangnath khade versus state of maharashtra & ors., (2012) bom cr(crl.) 632 have .....

Delhi High Court Bar Association and anr Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi and ...

Court : Delhi

..... extensively relied upon the binding pronouncements of the supreme court in a plethora of judgments including air1955bombay 35 basantlal banarsilal v. bansilal dagdulal; (1985) 3 scc661gram panchayat of village jamalpur v. malwinder singh &ors.; (2002) 8 scc182kaiser-ihind pvt. ltd. v. national textile corporation (maharashtra north) ltd. &ors.; (2009) 5 scc342grand ..... relevant portion of the letter, which referred to the bill passed by the maharashtra legislative council and the maharashtra legislative assembly extending the duration of the bombay rent act for 5 years from 1st april, 1986. xxx xxx xxx a telegraphic message dated 25th february, 1986 sent by the special commissioner, ..... . the early legislative measures in india on court fees were the madras regulation iii of 1782, the bengal regulation act xxxviii of 1795 and the bombay regulation viii of 1802. subsequently all provincial regulations were amalgamated into a single legislation, the court fees act xxvi of 1860. this act was also .....