Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bombay electricity duty act 1958 maharashtra preamble the bombay electricity duty act 1958 Page 100 of about 2,273 results (0.304 seconds)

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri Bhaskara Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... indeed, it is surprising that the court has not even referred to the long preamble to the act which clearly sets out the context and purpose of the said enactment. ..... where a statute empowers the specified authorities to take preventive action against the citizens it is essential that it should expressly make it a part of the duty of the said authorities to satisfy themselves about the existence of what the statute 415 regards as conditions precedent to the exercise of the said authority. ..... these proposition get support from the following authoritative pronouncements of the hon'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd. ..... state of maharashtra reported in air1963scc200 the apex court has held that a conviction can be reasonably founded on circumstantial evidence and an inference of guilt can be drawn if the proved facts are wholly inconsistent with the innocence of the accused and are consistent with his guilt. ..... municipal corporation of greater bombay and others and connected matters.6. ..... (2007) 6 scc236 greater bombay coop. ..... , bombay (ii).16. ..... bombay municipal corporation and others99air2017sc5500: nikesh tarachand shah vs. ..... bombay municipal corporation and others. 72.w.p. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Smt. A S Nirmala Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... indeed, it is surprising that the court has not even referred to the long preamble to the act which clearly sets out the context and purpose of the said enactment. ..... where a statute empowers the specified authorities to take preventive action against the citizens it is essential that it should expressly make it a part of the duty of the said authorities to satisfy themselves about the existence of what the statute 415 regards as conditions precedent to the exercise of the said authority. ..... these proposition get support from the following authoritative pronouncements of the hon'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd. ..... state of maharashtra reported in air1963scc200 the apex court has held that a conviction can be reasonably founded on circumstantial evidence and an inference of guilt can be drawn if the proved facts are wholly inconsistent with the innocence of the accused and are consistent with his guilt. ..... municipal corporation of greater bombay and others and connected matters.6. ..... (2007) 6 scc236 greater bombay coop. ..... , bombay (ii).16. ..... bombay municipal corporation and others99air2017sc5500: nikesh tarachand shah vs. ..... bombay municipal corporation and others. 72.w.p. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri D R Siddaramaiah Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... indeed, it is surprising that the court has not even referred to the long preamble to the act which clearly sets out the context and purpose of the said enactment. ..... where a statute empowers the specified authorities to take preventive action against the citizens it is essential that it should expressly make it a part of the duty of the said authorities to satisfy themselves about the existence of what the statute 415 regards as conditions precedent to the exercise of the said authority. ..... these proposition get support from the following authoritative pronouncements of the hon'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd. ..... state of maharashtra reported in air1963scc200 the apex court has held that a conviction can be reasonably founded on circumstantial evidence and an inference of guilt can be drawn if the proved facts are wholly inconsistent with the innocence of the accused and are consistent with his guilt. ..... municipal corporation of greater bombay and others and connected matters.6. ..... (2007) 6 scc236 greater bombay coop. ..... , bombay (ii).16. ..... bombay municipal corporation and others99air2017sc5500: nikesh tarachand shah vs. ..... bombay municipal corporation and others. 72.w.p. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Smt. Pushpavathi Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... indeed, it is surprising that the court has not even referred to the long preamble to the act which clearly sets out the context and purpose of the said enactment. ..... where a statute empowers the specified authorities to take preventive action against the citizens it is essential that it should expressly make it a part of the duty of the said authorities to satisfy themselves about the existence of what the statute 415 regards as conditions precedent to the exercise of the said authority. ..... these proposition get support from the following authoritative pronouncements of the hon'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd. ..... state of maharashtra reported in air1963scc200 the apex court has held that a conviction can be reasonably founded on circumstantial evidence and an inference of guilt can be drawn if the proved facts are wholly inconsistent with the innocence of the accused and are consistent with his guilt. ..... municipal corporation of greater bombay and others and connected matters.6. ..... (2007) 6 scc236 greater bombay coop. ..... , bombay (ii).16. ..... bombay municipal corporation and others99air2017sc5500: nikesh tarachand shah vs. ..... bombay municipal corporation and others. 72.w.p. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

G T Srinivas Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... indeed, it is surprising that the court has not even referred to the long preamble to the act which clearly sets out the context and purpose of the said enactment. ..... where a statute empowers the specified authorities to take preventive action against the citizens it is essential that it should expressly make it a part of the duty of the said authorities to satisfy themselves about the existence of what the statute 415 regards as conditions precedent to the exercise of the said authority. ..... these proposition get support from the following authoritative pronouncements of the hon'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd. ..... state of maharashtra reported in air1963scc200 the apex court has held that a conviction can be reasonably founded on circumstantial evidence and an inference of guilt can be drawn if the proved facts are wholly inconsistent with the innocence of the accused and are consistent with his guilt. ..... municipal corporation of greater bombay and others and connected matters.6. ..... (2007) 6 scc236 greater bombay coop. ..... , bombay (ii).16. ..... bombay municipal corporation and others99air2017sc5500: nikesh tarachand shah vs. ..... bombay municipal corporation and others. 72.w.p. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri H Vishwanath Vs. The Tahasildhar

Court : Karnataka

..... indeed, it is surprising that the court has not even referred to the long preamble to the act which clearly sets out the context and purpose of the said enactment. ..... where a statute empowers the specified authorities to take preventive action against the citizens it is essential that it should expressly make it a part of the duty of the said authorities to satisfy themselves about the existence of what the statute 415 regards as conditions precedent to the exercise of the said authority. ..... these proposition get support from the following authoritative pronouncements of the hon'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd. ..... state of maharashtra reported in air1963scc200 the apex court has held that a conviction can be reasonably founded on circumstantial evidence and an inference of guilt can be drawn if the proved facts are wholly inconsistent with the innocence of the accused and are consistent with his guilt. ..... municipal corporation of greater bombay and others and connected matters.6. ..... (2007) 6 scc236 greater bombay coop. ..... , bombay (ii).16. ..... bombay municipal corporation and others99air2017sc5500: nikesh tarachand shah vs. ..... bombay municipal corporation and others. 72.w.p. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri H B Devaraju Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... indeed, it is surprising that the court has not even referred to the long preamble to the act which clearly sets out the context and purpose of the said enactment. ..... where a statute empowers the specified authorities to take preventive action against the citizens it is essential that it should expressly make it a part of the duty of the said authorities to satisfy themselves about the existence of what the statute 415 regards as conditions precedent to the exercise of the said authority. ..... these proposition get support from the following authoritative pronouncements of the hon'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd. ..... state of maharashtra reported in air1963scc200 the apex court has held that a conviction can be reasonably founded on circumstantial evidence and an inference of guilt can be drawn if the proved facts are wholly inconsistent with the innocence of the accused and are consistent with his guilt. ..... municipal corporation of greater bombay and others and connected matters.6. ..... (2007) 6 scc236 greater bombay coop. ..... , bombay (ii).16. ..... bombay municipal corporation and others99air2017sc5500: nikesh tarachand shah vs. ..... bombay municipal corporation and others. 72.w.p. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

D N Kumar Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... indeed, it is surprising that the court has not even referred to the long preamble to the act which clearly sets out the context and purpose of the said enactment. ..... where a statute empowers the specified authorities to take preventive action against the citizens it is essential that it should expressly make it a part of the duty of the said authorities to satisfy themselves about the existence of what the statute 415 regards as conditions precedent to the exercise of the said authority. ..... these proposition get support from the following authoritative pronouncements of the hon'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd. ..... state of maharashtra reported in air1963scc200 the apex court has held that a conviction can be reasonably founded on circumstantial evidence and an inference of guilt can be drawn if the proved facts are wholly inconsistent with the innocence of the accused and are consistent with his guilt. ..... municipal corporation of greater bombay and others and connected matters.6. ..... (2007) 6 scc236 greater bombay coop. ..... , bombay (ii).16. ..... bombay municipal corporation and others99air2017sc5500: nikesh tarachand shah vs. ..... bombay municipal corporation and others. 72.w.p. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

G Basavaraja Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... indeed, it is surprising that the court has not even referred to the long preamble to the act which clearly sets out the context and purpose of the said enactment. ..... where a statute empowers the specified authorities to take preventive action against the citizens it is essential that it should expressly make it a part of the duty of the said authorities to satisfy themselves about the existence of what the statute 415 regards as conditions precedent to the exercise of the said authority. ..... these proposition get support from the following authoritative pronouncements of the hon'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd. ..... state of maharashtra reported in air1963scc200 the apex court has held that a conviction can be reasonably founded on circumstantial evidence and an inference of guilt can be drawn if the proved facts are wholly inconsistent with the innocence of the accused and are consistent with his guilt. ..... municipal corporation of greater bombay and others and connected matters.6. ..... (2007) 6 scc236 greater bombay coop. ..... , bombay (ii).16. ..... bombay municipal corporation and others99air2017sc5500: nikesh tarachand shah vs. ..... bombay municipal corporation and others. 72.w.p. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri. A. H. Sundaresh Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... indeed, it is surprising that the court has not even referred to the long preamble to the act which clearly sets out the context and purpose of the said enactment. ..... where a statute empowers the specified authorities to take preventive action against the citizens it is essential that it should expressly make it a part of the duty of the said authorities to satisfy themselves about the existence of what the statute 415 regards as conditions precedent to the exercise of the said authority. ..... these proposition get support from the following authoritative pronouncements of the hon'ble apex court: (1) (1989)4 scc630sham sunder & others vs state of haryana (2) (1998)5 scc343state of haryana vs brij lal mittal & others (3) (2008)5 scc662s.k.alagh vs state of uttar pradesh & others588(4) (2008)17 scc285tamil nadu electricity board vs rasipuram textile private limited & others (5) (2005)8 scc89s.m.s.pharmaceuticals ltd. ..... state of maharashtra reported in air1963scc200 the apex court has held that a conviction can be reasonably founded on circumstantial evidence and an inference of guilt can be drawn if the proved facts are wholly inconsistent with the innocence of the accused and are consistent with his guilt. ..... municipal corporation of greater bombay and others and connected matters.6. ..... (2007) 6 scc236 greater bombay coop. ..... , bombay (ii).16. ..... bombay municipal corporation and others99air2017sc5500: nikesh tarachand shah vs. ..... bombay municipal corporation and others. 72.w.p. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //