Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bombay commissioners of divisions act 1957 Page 13 of about 4,803 results (0.052 seconds)

Thina Boomi Vs. State Rep. by Inspector of Police, City Crime Branch

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2000(1)CTC351

..... malar containing a prize coupon carrying some prize or the other which are not equal in value, definitely would mean a prize scheme within thedefinition of section 2(b) of the act, constituting an offence punishable under section 4 read with sections 3 and 5 of the act, in which case, the words 'in any other manner' used in the definition of the prize scheme, certainly covers the alleged sale of tickets for deepavali special malar ..... , learned senior counsel, invited my attention to the letter dated 12.8.1999 issued by the additional deputy commissioner of police, central crime branch, egmore, chennai-8, wherein, the petitioner was called upon to furnish ..... monopolies & restrictive trade practices commission, 1999 (6) scc 485, which arises under the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act, 1969, wherein, the apex court has held that the fact that some bottles of horlicks which contain a slip of paper entitle the buyer to a prize, is not a lottery ..... ravindran, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, contends that what is prohibited under section 3 read with section 2(b) of the act is only a 'lot' or 'draw'; it would attract only the prize or gift offered or proposed to be given or delivered by lot or draw; and that the words 'in any other manner' should have a nexus to the 'lot ..... to my notice that the petitioner, as the publisher of thina boomi daily, is also a party to the decision of a division bench of this court in voice (consumer care council) v. ..... bombay state, : [1957] .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Rashid Exports Industries

Court : Allahabad

..... 422, the high court of bombay in commissioner of income-tax v. ..... courses permissible in law and it has resulted in loss of revenue; or where two views are possible and the income-tax officer has taken one view with which the commissioner does not agree, it cannot be treated as an erroneous order prejudicial to the interests of the revenue unless the view taken by the income-tax officer is unsustainable in law. ..... (supra) has clearly held that where two views are possible and income tax officer has taken a view with which the commissioner does not agree it does not mean nor it can be treated that the order passed by the assessing officer was an erroneous order prejudicial ..... and the income tax officer has taken one view the same cannot be treated as an erroneous order which is prejudicial to the interest of the revenue merely because the commissioner does not agree with the order unless the view taken by the income tax officer was not sustainable in law. 10. ..... aforesaid pronouncement, sri shubham agrawal, advocate urged that the assessing officer did not consider nor mentioned the provision of section 80-ib (13) read with section 80-ia(9) of the act and the assessment order was, therefore, passed in complete ignorance of the provisions and, therefore, the assessment order granting deductions was passed on incorrect application of law ..... abaraham relied on the judgment of the division bench of the high court of madras ..... jain [1957] 31 itr 872, the high court of karnataka in commissioner of income .....

Regional Director, E.S.i.C. Vs. Golden Gate Restaurant

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [2002(92)FLR1078]; (2002)ILLJ972Bom

..... lay-off and] other additional remuneration, if any, [paid at intervals not exceeding two months], but does not include- (a) any contribution paid by the employer to any pension fund or provident fund, or under this act; (b) any travelling allowance or the value of any travelling concession; (c) any sum paid to the person employed to defray special expenses entailed on him by the nature of his employment; or (d) any gratuity payable on discharge;' according to shri ..... the appellant is aggrieved by the judgment and order dated december 20, 1996 passed by the employees' insurance court, mumbai in exercise of its powers under section 75 of the act in the two separate applications filed by the respondent-restaurant to challenge the orders passed by the appellant-corporation for the recovery of the amounts mentioned in the impugned orders to the tune of ..... regional provident fund commissioner, bombay, the chief justice chagla had observed as back as all in 1956 as under at ..... relevant time: '2(9) ''employee' means any person employed for wages in or in connection with the work of a factory or establishment to which this act applies and - (i) who is directly employed by the principal employer on any work of, or incidental or preliminary to or connected with the work of, the factory or establishment whether such work is done by the employee in the factory or establishment or elsewhere; or (ii) who ..... has relied on a judgment of division bench of this court reported in : (1957)illj448bom j.g. .....

Pillani Investment Corporation Ltd. Vs. I.T.O. 'A' Ward, Calcutta and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1972SC236; [1972]83ITR217(SC); (1972)1SCC122; [1972]2SCR502

..... navanagar transport & industries(1) it was held that-'an order under section 23a of the indian income-tax act, 1922, as amended by the finance acts of 1955 and 1957, made by the income-tax officer directing payment of additional super-tax is not an order of assessment within the meaning of section 34(3) of the act, and to such an order the period of limitation prescribed under section 34(3) does not apply.'5. ..... commissioner of income-tax, bombay : [1965]56itr365(sc) , 921 where gajendragadkar, c.j. ..... the end of the year in which the income, profits or gains were first assessable' in section 34(3) are not really apposite to cover the order made under section 23a, as it stood before its amendment by the finance act ii of 1957. ..... the division bench followed the decision of this court in m.m. ..... a division bench of this court (hegde and grover, jj. ..... the appellant company protested that an order under section 23a would be an order of assessment or reassessment within section 34(3) of the indian income tax act, 1922, and, therefore, would be barred.3. ..... we may first point out that this point is not likely to arise under the income-tax act, 1961, as section 106 thereof specifically provides a period of limitation regarding orders under section 104, which is equivalent to section 23a of the income-tax act, 1922. mr. .....

Kottathala Handloom Weavers Indl. Co-op. Socy. Vs. Enforcement Officer ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2008(2)KLJ59; 2008(2)KLT486; (2008)IIILLJ101Ker

..... for a continues period of not less than one year the number of persons employed therein has been less than 15, the employer in relation to such an establishment may cease to give effect to the provisions of this act and any scheme framed thereunder with effect from beginning of the month following the expiry of the said period of one year but he shall within one month of the date of such cessation, intimate, by registered ..... the relevant portion reads as follows:in order to ensure that the establishment once covered under the act do not go out of the purview of the act merely due to a small reduction in their strength, provision is being made that an establishment once covered under the act will continue to be so covered despite a reduction in the employment strength.however, section 1(5) was later amended in 1972 to delete ..... (1) llj 87 cannot in these circumstances be pressed into service by the respondents though i must confess that the bombay view does appear to me to rhyme better with the objects and purposes of the statute. ..... but i must alertly note that in joseph the division bench was only attempting to ascertain the law as it stood prior to the amendment introducing ..... regional provident fund commissioner 1961 klj 1203, the kerala high court took the ..... the contention is that even before the dates of the alleged offences under the act, the employment strength had fallen below 50 - nay below 20, and therefore, the prosecutions are not legally correct ..... : (1957)iillj202bom and .....

Gujarat Electricity Board Vs. Hind Mazdoor Sabha

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1991)1GLR577; (1995)IIILLJ218Guj

..... regional provident fund commissioner, reported in 1957 (1) llj 448, a division bench of the bombay high court observed that the canon of construing a social legislation is very different from the canon of construing a taxation law. ..... after considering the aforesaid aspects and all other relevant aspects the tribunal in terms held that apart from the fact that no valid licence under the contract labour (regulations & abolition) act, 1970 was produced, other facts and circumstances were sufficient to lead to the conclusion that the workmen were the employees of the board.7. ..... it is further observed that if necessary the court must strain the language of the act in order to achieve the purpose which the legislature had in placing the legislation on the statute book. ..... way back in the year 1957 in the case of j.g. ..... the tribunal has based its finding on the sole ground that there were no valid licences for certain period with certain contractors, issued under the provisions of the contract labour (regulations and abolition) act, 1970. ..... therefore it was contended that the tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider the question of abolition of contract labour in view of the provisions of the contract labour (regulations and abolition) act, 1970. .....

Mst. Bashiran Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1957Raj348; 1957CriLJ1315

..... in that case also a pakistani national had come to india under a passport and a visa with category 'c' issued by the indian high commissioner at karachi.this visa was valid only during the period ending 16th may, 1954. ..... the state, air 1956 all 69 (a), a pakistani national chhanga khan had come to india with a passport valid for five years, that is, upto 19th november, 1957.several visas were made on this passport and the last visa was dated 21st april, 1954 by which chhanga khan was permitted to stay in india upto 9th july, 1954, chhanga khan, however, over ..... very recently another case of similar nature came before a division bench of the bombay high court consisting of gajendragadkar and gokhale jj. ..... 'with respect i entirely agree with the view taken by the allahabad and bombay high courts in the above cases and hold that the conviction of the applicant ..... entered india with this visa, the accused obtained permission to continue his stay in india upto 6th june, 1954 from the deputy commissioner of police, special branch. c. i. d. ..... further extensions were also granted to him at his request by the passport officer to the government of bombay and the last extension expired on the 6th july, 1954. ..... she may be said to be staying in india illegally but for an illegal act a person can be punished only if it is made punishable by law.reading through the passport rules ..... (note: section 3 of the passport act appears to have been mentioned in place of rule 3 of the passport rules by some over-sight .....

Ashoka Marketing Ltd. Vs. Company Law Board

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1968]38CompCas519(Cal)

..... and berar revocation of land revenue exemption act (37 of 1948), the state government acts in a quasi-judicial manner giving an opportunity to the claimants to state their case in the light of the report of the deputy commissioner and, therefore, the state government must give reasons for the order made under the said section ..... : [1966]1scr466 it was held that the central government exercising powers of revision of orders of state government under the mines and minerals (regulation and development) act and the rules framed thereunder, specially under sections 30 and 13 of the said act and the rules framed under section 13, that is, rule 55 of mineral concession rules, 1960, acts as a judicial tribunal and, as such judicial tribunal, the central government must give reasons for its decision. ..... it was decided that the central government, in hearing an appeal from an order by a board of directors of a company refusing to register shares in the name of the transferees in respect thereof in exercise of jurisdiction under section 111 of the companies act, 1956, acts as a judicial tribunal and is subject to the appellate jurisdiction of the supreme court under article 136 of the constitution.13. ..... it was also represented that an industrial dispute had been raised by the labour commissioner and was pending before him. ..... commissioner of hills division, : [1958]1scr1240 ..... reference in this connection may be made to the case of province of bombay v. ..... state industrial tribunal, : (1957)iillj1sc . 20. .....

M/S. Arole Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Shaikh Sadullah ShahabuddIn and ...

Court : Mumbai

..... and 227 of the constitution of india is invoked against the order dated 13/9/2013 passed by the learned joint charity commissioner, pune division, pune by which order the application no.5 of 2009 filed under section 36(2) of the bombay public trusts act (herein after referred to as the said act) came to be allowed and resultantly the permission granted by the joint charity commissioner under section 36(1)(b) of the said act came to be revoked. 3. ..... by the judgment rendered in appeal no.539 of 1957 the mode of succession of the trustees was prescribed and the father of the respondent no.2 herein was to be entrusted ..... suo motu suspend, remove or dismiss any trustee of a public trust, if he, a) makes persistent default in the submission of accounts, report or return (b) willfully disobeys any lawful orders issued by the charity commissioner, under the provisions of this act or rules made there-under by the state government; (c) continuously neglects his duty or commits any malfeasance or misfeasance, or breach of trust in respect of the trust ; (d) misappropriates or deals improperly ..... satisfied with the fact that the order dated 29/12/1994 was challenged in the year 2009 by the applicant shaikh sadullah shahabuddin peerzade by invoking section 36(2) of the said act, the joint charity commissioner nevertheless without taking into consideration the developments subsequent to the order dated 29/12/1994 has allowed the application on the ground that the consent of the fit person was .....

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Guntur Vs. Vasireddy Rama Bhanu Bhupal ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1970AP262

..... in response to the commissioner's request, proceedings for the acquisition of the land were started under the land acquisition act (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') and notification under section 4(1) of the act was published on 12-4-1956. ..... even tough the government according to the government pleader did not take possession of the land under the act at any time it was submitted that having regard to section 16 of the act it must be deemed that the government took possession of the land only immediately after the collector made the award i.e ..... the respondents in their case state that they expropriated the land on 13-10-1920, the date from which the appeal division directed the interest to be calculated and that date may be taken as correct. ..... lord warrington of clyffee delivering the judgment of the board stated as follows:'it is true that the appropriation under the act in question is not effected for private gain, but for the good of the public at large, but for all this the owner is deprived of his property n this case as much as in the other, and the rule ..... municipal commissioner for the city of bombay, ilr 43 bom 181 = (air 1918 pc 129 ) where the judicial committee observed as follows:'the board is of opinion that the right to interest depends upon the following broad and clear consideration. ..... , air 1957 andh pra 34 where in anticipation of the transfer of the property the prospective buyer was put in possession of the property it was held that section 55(4)(a) of the t. p .....