Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bombay children act 1948 maharashtra section 110 repeal of bom xiii of 1924 Sorted by: recent Court: supreme court of india Page 1 of about 52 results (0.239 seconds)

Sep 23 2024 (SC)

Just Rights For Children Alliance Vs. S. Harish

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE2024INSC716IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 2161-2162 OF2024(ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL) NOS. 3665-3666 OF2024 JUST RIGHTS FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE & ANR. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS S. HARISH & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT J.B. PARDIWALA, J.: For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts: - INDEX A. FACTUAL MATRIX ................................................................................ 4 B. IMPUGNED ORDER .............................................................................. 10 C. SUBMISSIONS OF THE PARTIES ...................................................... 16 i. Submissions on behalf of the Appellants. .................................................... 16 ii. Submissions on behalf of the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR). .......................................................................................... 18 iii. Submissions...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 29 2024 (SC)

A (mother Of X) Vs. State Of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reportable 2024 INSC371IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.5194 of 2024 A (Mother of X) Appellant Versus State of Maharashtra & Anr. Respondents JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI Background 1. This appeal emanates from a judgment of a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay dated 4 April 2024 which denied the minor daughter of the Appellant (hereinafter referred to as X) permission to terminate her pregnancy. X is a minor, about fourteen years of age and is alleged to have been subjected to sexual assault in September 2023. The incident did not come to the fore till X revealed the incident on 20 March 2024 by which time she was Page 1 of 22 about 25 weeks into her pregnancy. X, it has been averred, always had irregular periods and could not have assessed her pregnancy earlier.2. An FIR was registered with Turbhe MIDC Police Station against the alleged perpetrator on 20 March 2024 for offences punishable under Section 376 o...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 02 2024 (SC)

M/s. Bharti Airtel Limited Vs. A.s. Raghavendra

Court : Supreme Court of India

1 2024 INSC265REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5187 OF2023M/S BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED APPELLANT VERSUS A.S. RAGHAVENDRA RESPONDENT JUDGMENT AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the respondent-in-person.2. The present appeal arises out of the final judgment and order dated 31.03.2022 (hereinafter referred to as the impugned judgment), passed by a learned Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru (hereinafter referred to as the High Court) in Writ Appeal No.4067 of 2019 (L-TER) arising from Writ Petition No.13842 of 2018 (L-TER) by which the High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant (hereinafter also referred to as the Company), which was occasioned on account of the learned Single Judge partly allowing the respondents writ petition. THE FACTUAL COMPASS:3. The respondent, upon being interviewed by the appellants concerned officials was appointed as the Regional Business He...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 19 2024 (SC)

Apoorva Arora Vs. State (govt. Of Nct Of Delhi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE2024INSC223IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). /2024 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (CRL.) NO(S). 5463-5464/2023 APOORVA ARORA & ANR. ETC. . APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. RESPONDENT(S) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). /2024 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.6786/2023 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). /2024 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.5532/2023 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). /2024 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.8385-8387/2023 JUDGMENT PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, J.1. Leave granted.2. The appellants/accused are the actors, casting director, script writers, creator of the web-series College Romance1, and the media company that owns the YouTube channel on which the 1 TVF Media Labs Private Ltd. 1 web-series was hosted2. They are sought to be investigated and prosecuted for production, transmission, and online publication of obscene and sexually-explicit material under Sections 67 and 67A of the Information Technology Act, 20003. The appellan...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 10 2023 (SC)

National Medical Commission Vs. Annasaheb Chudaman Patil Memorial Medi ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

1 Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No 966 of 2023 (Arising out of SLP(C) No 5623 of 2022) National Medical Commission & Anr .... Appellant(s) Versus Annasaheb Chudaman Patil Memorial Medical College & Ors ....Respondent(s) WITH Civil Appeal No 967 of 2023 (Arising out of SLP(C) No 6345 of 2022) JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI1Leave granted. 2 These appeals arise from a judgment dated 4 March 2022 of a Division Bench at the Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. 3 Annasaheb Chudaman Patil Memorial Medical College1 was established in 1990 with an annual intake capacity of 100 seats for the MBBS degree course. The MBBS degree granted by the University to which the Medical College was affiliated was recognized under Section 11 of the Indian Medical Council Act 1 Medical College 2 1956 for 100 seats in 1997. The recognition was liable to be renewed every five years. For the academic years 2017-18 and 2018-19, t...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 02 2023 (SC)

Prem Singh Vs. State Of Nct Delhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.01 OF2023(ARISING OUT OF SLP(CRIMINAL) No.2958 OF2019 PREM SINGH .APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT DINESH MAHESHWARI, J.Table of Contents Preliminary and brief outline ............................................................................................ 2 Relevant factual and background aspects ......................................................................... 5 Prosecution Evidence ............................................................................................................... 7 Stand of the appellant ........................................................................................................... 21 Trial Court found the appellant guilty and awarded life imprisonment ............................ 22 High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant ................................................... 26 Rival Submission...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 02 2022 (SC)

The State Of Maharashtra Vs. Maroti

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.1874 of 2022 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.718 of 2022) The State of Maharashtra & Anr. Appellants Versus Dr. Maroti s/o Kashinath Pimpalkar Respondent JUDGMENT C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J.1. Leave granted.2. This Court in Shalu Ojha v. Prashant Ojha1 observed: this is an unfortunate case where the provisions of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 are rendered simply a pious hope of the Parliament and a teasing illusion for the appellant. Even while, borrowing those words, we may say, we are 1 (2015) 2 SCC99Page 1 of 28 not peeved, but certainly pained, as a legitimate prosecution under another Act viz., the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short POCSO Act), has been throttled at the threshold by the exercise of power under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short Cr.P.C.), without permitting the materials in support t...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 20 2022 (SC)

Maharashtra State Board Of Wakfs Vs. Shaikh Yusuf Bhai Chawla

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 7812-7814 OF2022(Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 31288-31290 of 2011) MAHARASHTRA STATE BOARD OF WAKFS Appellant (s) VERSUS SHAIKH YUSUF BHAI CHAWLA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.7930 OF2022(Arising out of SLP(C) No.12296 of 2013) CIVIL APPEAL No.7929 OF2022(Arising out of SLP(C) No.12295 of 2013) CIVIL APPEAL No.7928 OF2022(Arising out of SLP(C) No.12291 of 2013) CIVIL APPEAL No.7927 OF2022(Arising out of SLP(C) No.12293 of 2013) CIVIL APPEAL No.7926 OF2022(Arising out of SLP(C) No.12290 of 2013) CIVIL APPEAL No.7925 OF2022(Arising out of SLP(C) No.12288 of 2013) CIVIL APPEAL No.7924 OF2022(Arising out of SLP(C) No.35198 of 2011) CIVIL APPEAL No.7923 OF2022(Arising out of SLP(C) No.35196 of 2011) 1 CIVIL APPEAL No.7922 OF2022(Arising out of SLP(C) No.32636 of 2011) CIVIL APPEAL No.7921 OF2022(Arising out of SLP(C) No.16915 of 2012) CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 7914 - 7920 OF2022(Arising out of SLP(C) ...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2022 (SC)

The State Of Maharashtra Vs. 63 Moons Technologies Ltd

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reportable 2022 INSC465IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos. 2748-49 of 2022 The State of Maharashtra .Appellant Versus 63 Moons Technologies Ltd. Respondent And With Civil Appeal Nos. 2750-51 of 2022 1 JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J Contents A. Facts............................................................................................................3 B. Submissions.............................................................................................17 C. Analysis....................................................................................................25 C. 1 Framework of the MPID Act...................................................................25 C. 2 Framework of NSE..................................................................................27 C. 3 Definitions of Deposit and Financial Establishment: Interpretation of Section 2(c) and 2(d) of the MPID Act....................................................

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 18 2021 (SC)

Attorney General For India Vs. Satish

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1410 OF2021(@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL) No.925 OF2021 ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR INDIA .... APPELLANT(S) VERSUS SATISH AND ANOTHER .... RESPONDENT(S) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1411 OF2021(@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL) No.1339 OF2021 NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR WOMEN .... APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER.... RESPONDENT(S) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1412 OF2021(@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL) No.1159 OF2021 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .... APPELLANT(S) VERSUS SATISH .... RESPONDENT(S) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1413 OF2021(@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL) No.5071 OF2021 1 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .... APPELLANT(S) VERSUS LIBNUS .... RESPONDENT(S) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1414 OF2021(@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL) No.7472 OF2021 SATISH ... APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .... RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT BELA M. TRIVEDI, J.1. Leave granted in all appeals.2. The four Appeals filed by the a...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //