Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.152 OF2013TOFAN SINGH Appellant Versus STATE OF TAMIL NADU Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1750 OF2009CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2214 OF2009CRIMINAL APPEAL No.827 OF2010CRIMINAL APPEAL No.835 OF2011CRIMINAL APPEAL No.836 OF2011CRIMINAL APPEAL No.344 OF2013CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1826 OF2013CRIMINAL APPEAL No.433 OF2014SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) No.6338 OF2015CRIMINAL APPEAL No.77 OF2015CRIMINAL APPEAL No.90 OF2017CRIMINAL APPEAL No.91 OF2017SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) No.1202 OF2017JUDGMENT R.F. Nariman, J.1.These Appeals and Special Leave Petitions arise by virtue of a reference order of a Division Bench of this Court reported as Tofan Singh v. State of Tamil Nadu (2013) 16 SCC31 The facts in that 1 appeal have been set out in that judgment in some detail, and need not be repeated by us. After hearing arguments from both sides, the Court recorded that the Appellant in Criminal Appeal No.152 of 2013 ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable 2023 INSC1058IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL WRIT / APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition (Civil) No.1099 of 2019 IN RE: ARTICLE370OF THE CONSTITUTION With Writ Petition (C) No.871 of 2015 With Writ Petition (C) No.722 of 2014 With SLP (C) No.19618 of 2017 With Writ Petition (C) No.1013 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1082 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1068 of 2019 1 With Writ Petition (C) No.1037 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1062 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1070 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1104 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1165 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1210 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1222 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.396 of 2017 With Writ Petition (C) No.756 of 2017 With Writ Petition (C) No.398 pf 2018 With 2 Writ Petition (C) No.924 of 2018 With Writ Petition (C) No.1092 of 2018 With Writ Petition (C) No.1162 of 2018 With Writ Petition (C) No.1048 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1268 of 2019 And With Writ Petition (...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE20H DAY OF DECEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA WRIT PETITION No.53036/2017(GM-RES)BETWEEN : SRI VISHWANATH H. M., S/O L. SHADAKSHARAIAH H. M., AGED ABOUT38YEARS, CLASS-I CONTRACTOR R/AT NO.58 PRESTIGE OASIS VISHWANATHPURA ROAD, RAJANUKUNTE, BENGALURU-560 064. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI S.M. CHANDRASHEKAR, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI H. PAVANA CHANDRA SHETTY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY2. GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE VIDHANA SOUDHA, 2 BENGALURU-5600O1. REPRESENTED BY ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY RESPONDENTS (BY SRI R. NATARAJ, ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERAL A/W MS. NILOUFER AKBAR, AGA FOR R1 & R2; AS PER THE COURT ORDER DATED2210.2018, BY PROF. RAVIVARMA KUMAR, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI H.V. MANJUNATHA, ADVOCATE FOR INTERVENOR IN I.A. NO.1/2018; By Sri H. MOHAN KUMAR, ADV. FOR INTERVENOR IN I.A....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE2023NSC605 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1269 OF2013MOHD. NAUSHAD APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) RESPONDENT(S) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.1270-1271 OF2013AND CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. @ SLP (CRL.) NOS.64476451 OF2013JUDGMENT SANJAY KAROL J.Prosecution Case.........................................................................................8 High Court and Trial Court Findings..........................................................16 Submissions of Counsels...........................................................................36 Submissions on behalf of A3, Mohd. Naushad.........................................36 Submissions on behalf of A9, Javed Ahmed Khan...................................45 Submissions on behalf of A5 and A6.......................................................46 Submission on behalf of the State (NCT of Delhi)....................................47 Prosecution Witnesses...............
Tag this Judgment!