Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bombay aerial ropeways act 1955 maharashtra section 28 review of orders under section 10 or 21 Court: chennai Page 1 of about 19 results (0.066 seconds)

Jul 10 2012 (HC)

V.D.S.R.Re.Rolling Mill. Vs. the Special Commissioner and Commissioner ...

Court : Chennai

..... contained in section 5 of the act applies automatically in the event an order under section 4 of the act is ..... motu, and after such enquiry as he deems necessary, the assistant commissioner is satisfied that the transfer of any granted land is null and void under sub-section (1) of section 4, he may, (a) by order take possession of such land after evicting all persons in possession thereof in such manner as may be prescribed: provided that no such order shall be made except after giving the person affected a reasonable opportunity of being heard; (b) restore such land to the original grantee or ..... at this juncture, it is to be noted that when such enactments namely, andhra pradesh assigned lands (prohibition on transfers) act, 1977, karnataka scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prohibition of transfer of certain lands) act, 1978 and maharashtra restoration of lands to scheduled tribes act, 1974 have been enacted in other states long back, state of tamil nadu, is yet to come out with ..... placing reliance on the details of lands, assigned to the depressed classes (in short described by the learned counsel as 'dc lands') published by the tahsildar, tiruvanamalai, for the year 1955-56, said to have been obtained under the right to information act, and enclosed in the additional typed set of papers and on the basis of the averments in the additional affidavit, mrs.radha gopalan, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the land in old ..... . decision of bombay light court d/-21 and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 21 1981 (HC)

D. Shanthalakshmi and ors. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1983Mad232; (1983)IIMLJ7

..... the vessels packages and coverings in which any opium liable to confiscation under this section is found and the other contents (if any) of the vessel or package in which such opium maybe concealed and the animals and conveyance used in carrying it shall likewise be liable to confiscation'.the above provision was amended by the opium madhya bharat amendment act 1955 (act xv of 1955) in the following words :-'section 11. ..... adverting to this the supreme court held that there is no higher authority prescribed in the order who could examine the property of the reasons and revise or review the decision of the subordinate office. ..... in ukha kolhe v state of maharashtra air 1963 sc 1531, the supreme court upheld the state law dealing with prohibition and altering provisions of the criminal procedure code and evidence act, which could be referable clearly to entries 2 and 12 of concurrent list, on the ground that the state law had received the assent of the president. ..... 129-a and 129-b will prevail in the state of bombay to the extent of inconsistency with prevail only to the extent of the repugnancy alone and no more is clear from the words of art 254'.64. ..... 66(1) of the bombay prohibition act, and reliance in this behalf was placed upon art. ..... bombay act 12 of 1959 was reserved for the consideration of the president and has received his assent : ss. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 29 1997 (HC)

R. Gandhi and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Rep. by the Ministry of La ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1997(3)CTC255

..... by article 395 of the constitution and, therefore, an order issued under section 94(3) government of india act would not possibly be operative after the inauguration of the constitution; nor could it be regarded as an order made under article 239 of the constitution.after negativing the contention that the order issued under that act was not a law in force within the meaning of article 372, their lordships observed at page 31 that an order made under section 94(3) government of india act conferring certain powers on the chief commissioner was ..... of these object and reasons would indicate that this legislation was brought in order to compensate loss of revenue by consumers who avoid payment of the sales tax or purchase tax on the vehicle payable in the state by purchasing it in another state where the rate was lesser than the state of maharashtra and then to bring the vehicle inside the state. ..... though, it is true, this particular question was not raised therein;'a very perusal of these objects and reasons would indicate that this legislation was brought in order to compensate loss of revenues by consumers who avoid of payment of the sales tax or purchase tax on the vehicle payable in the state by purchasing it in another state where the rate was lesser than the state of maharashtra and then, to bring the vehicle inside the state. ..... context, it is relevant to notice that the maharashtra entry tax act considered by this court in sakthi kumat. ..... . state of bombay : [1955]1scr799 , .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 04 2016 (HC)

N. Renuka Devi Vs. E. Lalitha and Another

Court : Chennai

..... (prayer: t.o.s.no.2 of 2009 numbered on conversion of o.p.no.367 of 2008, filed under sections 232 and 276 of the indian succession act, 1925, read with order 25 rule 5 of the madras high court original side rules, praying that letters of administration with a will annexed, may be granted to the plaintiff as the daughter and one of the legatees under the will of the deceased s.v.ramakrishnan, having effect limited to the state of tamil ..... . the learned judge, after considering the other decisions, came to the following conclusion : -- "a reading of schedule ii, article 11(k) of the tamil nadu court-fees and suits valuation act, 1955, clearly shows that in case of wills not disputed a fixed court-fee is made payable and where the wills are disputed and the matter becomes contentious, a court-fee of one half of the ad ..... . this appeal impugns the judgment of the division bench of the high court of judicature at bombay in a letters patent appeal holding that the amended provision of order 8, rule 1 of the code of civil procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as cpc ) would not apply to the suits on the original side of the high court and that such suits would continue to be governed by ..... . state of maharashtra (2003 (5) scc 413) (vide scc p.436, para 73) this court ..... decision by a court having jurisdiction is as much binding between the parties as a right one and may be superseded only by appeals to higher tribunals or other procedure like review which the law provides." 22 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 17 2012 (HC)

Sri Padmavathi Modern Rice Mill and ors. Vs. the Government of Puduche ...

Court : Chennai

..... union of india and others, (2009) 16 scc 569, to contend that determination of price in exercise of powers under section 3(2)(f) of sugar (control) order, under essential commodities act, 1955, though is a legislative function and the superior courts normally do not interfere with those functions, but when the functions are carried out in contravention of statutory requirements, ..... [(1987) 3 scc 189], it was opined :"25...we hold that the high court was not right in observing that the orders under section 22-b of the act imposing restrictions on consumption of power could not legally and validly be passed by the government "with retrospective effect" in ..... the citizens are in the nature of contractual rights, the manner, the method and motive of a decision of entering or not entering into a contract, are subject to judicial review on the touchstone of relevance and reasonableness, fair play, natural justice, equality and non-discrimination in the type of the transactions and nature of the dealing as in the present case ..... city & industrial development corporation of maharashtra, (2007) 10 scc 674, wherein it was held as under: "on the legal question, it is quite obvious that having acted and held out assurances to the appellants which caused the appellants to alter their position to their prejudice, it was not open to cidco to take a unilateral decision to cancel the allotment on the ground that it had acted without jurisdiction and/or in excess of jurisdiction and in ..... of bombay. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 13 2003 (HC)

Sri P.N. Ananthanarayanan Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Rep. by the Secret ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2003)IIILLJ570Mad; (2003)2MLJ633

..... over the staff of the state bank of india, it has certain amount of control over the highest functionaries of the state bank, and under section 19 of the state bank of india act 1955, the reserve bank of india has a major role to play. ..... that in his report he had to deal with the commissions and omissions of some of the officers as having been responsible for landing the state bank under heavy financial adversity and those very officers were not only reporting and reviewing officers, but had also later managed to climb the ladder of the hierarchy of the state bank while the petitioner had been made to languish as ..... perused the records from 1984 upto date and the remarks with reference to category-wise assessment under several heads as well as the general remarks of the reporting officers and the reviewing authority and the comments are uniformly superlative expressions of his integrity, efficiency and capacity to tackle ..... features contained in the annual appraisal form and the rulings of the court in support of his contention that the courts had power under article 226 of the constitution to intervene and to strike down the promotion policy which could be demonstrated to be either arbitrary or ..... all the candidates who have already appeared for the interview but unsuccessful (repeaters) along with a fresh set of officials are considered in the order of seniority equal to two times the number of vacancies and such individual will come within his zone of consideration. ..... maharashtra .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 18 1989 (HC)

Park View Enterprises Vs. State Government of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1991]71CompCas723(Mad)

..... the inspector-general of registration, and that the deputy inspector-general of registration will inspect the properties and decide whether it comes under the amendment act 38 of 1987 and he will find whether there has been any suppression of facts relating to the consideration of market value as required under section 27, and communicate necessary orders to the concerned registrar, so that the shortfall noticed in stamp duty could be collected and they only ..... [1961]3scr77 , wherein, on a complete analysis of the provisions of the travancore-cochin land tax act, 1955 it was found that inequality is writ large in the act and is inherent in the very provisions of the taxing section and that the act does not lay down any principle or policy for guidance in the exercise of discretion by the government in respect of the selection contemplated by section 7 and, therefore, it was held that failure to classify in a matter of ..... violated. it was a case wherein the floor area was adopted for determining rent for fixing a ratable value under the bombay act 59 of 1949, and it was held that such a method is violative of article 14, because it was felt that it would give rise to inequalities, as there had ..... nature. in spite of being aware of the delhi apartment ownership act, 1984, and the maharashtra act 5 of 1984, half-hearted and ununderstandable amendments have been brought about, which are injected with vagueness and uncertainties in implementation, leading to a high degree of arbitrariness which .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 21 1984 (HC)

Entertaining Enterprises, Madras and ors. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1984Mad278

..... movies on the television screen it is certainly used as an apparatus or the representation of moving pictures or series of pictures and comes within the definition of 'cinematograph' as defined under the cinematograph act (1952) and therefore, exhibiting movies, by playing pre-recorded cassettes in vcr in cafes and restaurants, comes within the ban contained in section 3 of the bombay cinemas (regulation) act, 1953 which prohibits the exhibition by means of a cinematograph elsewhere than in a place licensed ..... of any video cassette, it was no offence to be in such possession without a letter of consent, but the provisions of section 9(2) of the act now make it a punishable offence if the persons running the video library does not have a consent letter as contemplated by section 9(2)(5) in any event, the provisions of the act amount to a violation of the petitioner's fundamental right under article 19(1)(g) and it is not saved by article 19(5) as amounting to a reasonable restriction imposed in the course of regulation of ..... that the body of the film, should not have been altered or tampered with in any manner since the issue of the certificate, is intended to maintain - public morals, and public order and this is jay way of regulation of the distribution of videos by the video libraries to the members of the public, and. ..... ) was not regulated by tamilnadu act 9 of 1955, and as such, there has been it proliferation of exhibition of films recorded on video cassette tapes and ..... maharashtra .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 27 2013 (HC)

A.Arunagiri Vs. Egmore Benefit Society Ltd.

Court : Chennai

..... the discretionary power of the court to fix interest under order xxxiv, rule 11, was held by the supreme court in this case to be an independent power, not traceable either to section 74 of the contract act or to any power under the usurious loans act, 1918 or to any statute permitting a court to scale down contractual rate of interest. 37.29 ..... therefore, the allegations that some unlawful elements were present and that genuine bidders were prevented from effective participation and that a few bidders formed themselves into a cartel and acted in collusion with the mortgagee are all cooked up for the purpose of this case and these averments are obviously added as pepper and salt at the time of filing the plaint into court, presumably on legal ..... , madras-600 084, the first defendant herein, has no right of alienation by private sale invoking section 69 of the transfer of property act in respect of the loan covered under the equitable mortgage deed dated 1.8.1995 except of recovery of the dues by regular suit in accordance with ..... in narandas karsondas, a cooperative housing society registered under the maharashtra cooperative housing finance society limited mortgaged a land and structure with power to sell ..... but the appeal as well as the review filed in review application no.113 of 2000 were dismissed by the division bench ..... similarly, a full bench of the bombay high court held in hari vs. ..... egmore benefit society (air 1955 mad 135). ..... of this court way back in 1955 in v.narasimhachariar v. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 10 2014 (HC)

Mariya Anton Vijay Vs. the State Represented By,

Court : Chennai

..... house officer received the complaint and registered a case in crime no.18 of 2013 at 18.00 hours on 13.10.2013 for offences under section 25(1b)(a) and (f) of the arms act, 1959 and section 3(b) r/w.7(1)(a)(ii) of the essential commodities act, 1955 and section 2(m)(5) of motor spirit and high speed diesel (regulation of supply, distribution and prevention of malpractices) order, 1990. ..... liable for prosecution for violating the control order, 2005 punishable under section 3(ii)(d) r/w 7(1)(a)(ii) of the essential commodities act, 1955. ..... territory of indian sea and further a38 to a45 had illegally supplied foodstuffs and fuel to the ship in violation of motor spirit and high speed diesel (regulation of supply, distribution and prevention of malpractices) order, 1998 punishable under section 7 of the essential commodities act, 1955. ..... 7(1)(a)(ii) of the essential commodities act, 1955 and order 2(e)(v)(vi) of motor spirit and high speed diesel (regulation of supply, distribution and prevention of malpractices) order, 1998 and section 120(b) of indian penal code ..... (uttar pradesh) (3) a8-naveen rana (himachal pradesh) (4) a9-dinesh narayanan (kerala) (5) a10-ramesh kumar (himachal pradesh) (6) a11-rajan thandpani (tamil nadu) (7) a12-abijit ashok sawani (maharashtra) (8) a13-jagdish prasad (chief cook from uttaranchal) the chief cook who hails from uttaranchal state has also been joined in the conspiracy and made accused along with the others; as regards the ..... state of bombay [air1954s .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //