Court : Kolkata Appellate
..... 582)ix) nikhil merchant vs- central bureau of investigation and another (2008 volume-ix supreme court cases page-677)x) aloke roy & others vs- the state of west bengal & another (2009 volume-i calcutta criminal law reporter (calcutta) page-930)xi) central bureau of investigation vs- a. ravishankar prasad & others (2009 volume-vi supreme ..... supreme court page-2222)iii) state of haryana vs- bhajan lal (1992 supplementary volume-i supreme court cases page- 335)iv) surendra nath mohanty & another vs- state of orissa (1999 supreme court cases (criminal) page- 998)v) b.s. joshi & others vs- state of haryana & another (2003 volume-iv supreme court cases page-675)vi) ..... court cases page-351)xii) rumi dhar (smt) vs- state of west bengal & another (2009 volume-vi supreme court cases page-364)xiii)amar nath shukla vs- state of uttaranchal (2010 volume-i calcutta criminal law reporter (supreme court) page-39 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata Appellate
..... ors. 2003 cr.l.r. (sc) 752 and jahan singh v. delhi administration 1974 scc (cri) 558. 13) mr. swapan mallick, learned counsel for the opposite party/ state of west bengal contended that the fir as well as the c.d. contain sufficient materials suggesting involvement of the petitioners in the alleged crime and at this primary stage of investigation which ..... contention, mr. maitra referred to the decisions in t. vengama naidu v. t. darashawmi naidu and ors. ( 2008) 2 scc (cri) 231 and minu kumari and anr. v. state of bihar (2006) 2 scc (cri) 310. 12) besides the decision of the honble apex court in state of hariyana v. bajan lal 1992 scc (cri) 426, mr. mitra also referred to .....
Tag this Judgment!