Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bayaluseeme development board act 1994 section 25 report Page 14 of about 27,184 results (0.184 seconds)

Karambir Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court No. 1 and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... (6) the appropriate government or the specified authority may, either on its own motion or on the application made by the employer or any workman, review its order granting or refusing to grant permission under sub- section (3) or refer the matter or, as the case may be, cause it to be referred, to a tribunal for adjudication: provided that where a reference has been made to a tribunal under this subsection, it shall pass an award within ..... upon by the learned counsel for the petitioner are concerned, in the case of uttaranchal forest development corporation s case (supra), the court has held that failure to comply with the provisions of section 25-n of the act would entitle the workman full back wages ..... concerned with the order of the tribunal wherein the tribunal has held that the definition of dock worker includes within its scope bargemen too but the wage board had erroneously failed to make any recommendation with regard to the wages and allowances payable to the bargemen ..... up for consideration the second question which was referred to it, namely, if for any reason, the bargemen were not entitled to the benefits under the recommendations made by the wage board, to what other relief with regard to the wages and allowances they were entitled to? ..... consideration before the supreme court in the case reported as (1994) 2 scc323 m ..... the circumstances of the case, the fair wages and allowances payable to the bargemen should be the same as the fair wages payable pursuant to the recommendations made by the wage board .....

Forest Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in : (1996)(83)ELT570Tri(Chennai)

..... - for the purposes of determining the value of clearances under this notification, in respect of chinaware or porcelainware or both, where a manufacturer gets such chinaware or porcelainware or both fired in a kiln belonging to or maintained by a pottery development centre run by the central government or a state government or by the khadi and village industries commission, the value of the x x x" he pleaded that unless the brand name is actually affixed shown to be affixed on the goods fabricated by them ..... where exemption from the whole of the duty of excise leviable thereon is granted based upon the value or quantity of clearances made in a financial year) issued under sub-rule (1) of rule 8 of the said rules, or under sub-section (1) to section 5a of the central excises and salt act, 1944 (1 of 1944), shall not be taken into account. ..... shall be applicable to the specified goods where a manufacturer affixes the specified goods with a brand name or trade name (registered or not) of the khadi and village industries commission, the state khadi and village industries board, the national small industries corporation or the state small industries development corporation. ..... for the purposes of this notification, the expression 'value' means either the value as determined in accordance with the provisions of section 4 of the central excises and salt act, 1944 (i of 1944) or, as the case may be, according to the tariff values fixed or altered under section 3 of the said act explanation ii. .....

Forbes Gokak Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in : (2005)(102)ECC257

..... the dta clearances are being effected on the basis of the permissions given by the assistant development commissioner, cochin export processing zone, sub-office, bangalore, from time to time. ..... cc, 2003 (86) elt 505 (sc) : 2003 (153) elt 276 (sc) which lays down that reports obtained by department itself has greater force and it should not be ignored. ..... they had been importing the same regularly from 1994 and there was no question of suppression of any fact in the matter.2. ..... the appellants' contention is that in terms of the board's circular and clarification, if consumables are used, then they are not disentitled from the benefit of the notification. ..... the sitra, in their report, have clearly indicated that the application of wax to a warp sheet is to improve its weaving performance. ..... in terms of the board's circular no. ..... the appellant is a 100% eou engaged in the manufacture of combed grey cotton yarn of various counts falling under ch 5205 of the schedule to cet act. .....

Nlrb Vs. Bell Aerospace Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... " after the act's passage, however, the board developed the concept of "managerial employee" in a series of ..... [ footnote 21 ] section 6 provides: "the board shall have authority from time to time to make, amend, and rescind, in the manner prescribed by the administrative procedure act, such rules and regulations as may be necessary to carry out the ..... sections 9(c)(1) and (2) of the national labor relations act (nlra) empower the board to investigate petitions involving questions of unit representation, to conduct hearings on such petitions, to direct representation elections, and to ..... " the discussion of "confidential employees" in both the house and conference committee reports, however, unmistakably refers to that term as defined in the house bill, which was not limited ..... [ footnote 4 ] section 2(3) of the act defines the term "employee" as follows: "the term 'employee' shall include any employee, and shall not be limited to the employees of a particular employer, unless this subchapter ..... of the foregoing sections, the term "employee" as defined in 2(3) of the act, means "any employee" of the employer, "but shall not include any individual employed as an agricultural laborer, or in the domestic service of any family or person at his home, or any individual employed by his parent or spouse, or any individual having the status of an independent contractor, or any individual employed as a supervisor, or any individual employed by an employer subject to the railway labor act. . . .....

Good Samaritan Hospital Vs. Shalala

Court : US Supreme Court

..... all payments to providers for services to medicare beneficiaries are made under the authority of 1395g, since it is the only section in title xviii of the social security act to deal with that subject; and 1395g thus authorizes all payments to be "adjust[ed] on account of previously made overpayments or ..... part a medicare benefits, for example, cover, among other things, "inpatient hospital services," see 42 cfr 409.5 (1992), a term that encompasses everything from bed and board, nursing services, and use of hospital facilities to medical social services, drugs, biologicals, supplies, appliances and equipment, certain other diagnostic and therapeutic services, and medical or surgical services provided by certain interns or residents ..... moreover, the agency's development-and continued augmentation-of the various exceptions, exemptions, and adjustments to the cost limits is difficult to harmonize with an interpretation of clause (ii) that would give a provider the right to contest the application of any particular and ..... petitioners point to a comment in the committee reports explaining that the cost limits were merely "presumptive" and that "[p]roviders would, of course, have the right to obtain reconsideration of their classification for purposes of cost limits applied to them and to obtain relief ..... , 20 cfr 405.451(b)(1) (1967) stated: "these regulations also provide for the making of suitable retroactive adjustments after the provider has submitted fiscal and statistical reports. .....

Hughes Aircraft Co. Vs. United States Ex Rel. Schumer

Court : US Supreme Court

..... force initially concluded, in a june 1986 preliminary classified audit report, that hughes had improperly billed the b-2 program for certain development costs that should have been charged solely to the f ..... schumer's complaint alleged that hughes knowingly mischarged northrop-and through it the united states-for certain radar development costs that should have been allocated to the fixed-price f-15 subcontract with mcdonnell-douglas instead of to the cost- ..... was awarded the b-2 subcontract, the mcdonnell-douglas corporation awarded hughes a "fixedprice" subcontract to design and develop an upgraded radar system for the f-15 fighter aircraft, which mcdonnelldouglas was then building for the air force ..... 1997-decided june 16, 1997 in 1989, respondent schumer filed an action against petitioner hughes aircraft company under the qui tam provision of the false claims act (fca), which permits, in certain circumstances, suits by private parties on behalf of the united states against anyone submitting a false claim to the ..... postal service, 37 f.3d 535 , 537, 539 (ca9 1994) (relying on landgraf in concluding that "a newly enacted statute that lengthens the applicable statute of limitations may not be applied retroactively to revive a plaintiff's claim that was otherwise barred under the old statutory scheme ..... 298 , 303 (1994) (holding that an increase in monetary liability could not be applied retroactively even though the "normative scope of title vii's prohibition on workplace ..... 1994 .....

Dalbir Singh Bhagat and ors. Vs. Chandigarh Administration and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1993)104PLR600

..... sarin further contended that bareilly development board does not lay down an inflexible rule of thumb and where, as in this case, the increase is totally arbitrary and no justification is offered, the action is subject to judicial review and liable to be set aside being in contravention of article 14 of ..... we, therefore, dispose of these connected writ petitions by setting aside annexure 'p-3' it will be open to the board to take further action in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract in question. ..... it appears that the petitioners paid the amount on april 9, 1992, however, the board issued letter (annexure p-3') seeking to increase the price of the flats in both the categories ..... the objection is that the contract between the petitioners and the board was a non-statutory one and writ petition under article 226/227 of the constitution was not maintainable for the alleged breach of the ..... ashok aggarwal, senior advocate, appearing for the respondent board, states that similar written statement may be taken as having been filed in the remaining connected petitions ..... was placed on bareilly development authority v. ..... did not even once suggest in the course of the arguments that the petitioners were entitled to possession of the flats on the original pi ice and that the board was not entitled to any increase whatsoever. ..... 4 75 lacs in respect of category i and category ii flats, respectively, mentioned in annexure 'p-3' was incorrect and, in act, the escalated cost would be rs. .....

Lipika Das Vs. Kolkata Municipal Corporation and Others

Court : Kolkata

..... tower without obtaining previous sanction and that too atop a building which yet to be granted a completion certificate under section 403 of the act, in my view, the issue is covered by the law laid down in paragraph 25 of the judgment of the apex court in friends colony development committee (supra) relied on behalf of the corporation. ..... though i find from the affidavit in opposition filed by the corporation that the department of environment, government of west bengal had issued an order dated 24th april, 2008 under the environment (protection) act, 1986 and the rules framed thereunder directing the mobile service providers to follow the guidelines contained therein strictly, however, there is nothing on record to show compliance of the said order either by the ..... of ground floor level, there is no bar in granting post facto sanction and the tower erected may be directed to be regularized on payment of fees, cannot be accepted because it is against the provisions contained in section 392 which in no uncertain language creates a complete bar or prohibits in erecting a structure except with the previous sanction of the municipal commissioner .though the word prior . ..... , reveals that permission for installation of tower shall be granted to the owners provided sanctioned plan, agreement with the service provider, no objection certificate from the west bengal pollution control board and structural stability certificate are produced. ..... west bengal pollution control board while applying for .....

Angel Broking Ltd. Vs.sharda Kapur

Court : Delhi

..... the sole issue in this case is that whether the court below or this court has a power under section 34 of the act to modify the award and grant additional reliefs not granted by the award or grant the alternative reliefs which were prayed for in the arbitration proceedings but were denied by the award.7. ..... it is also true that there are no parimateria provisions like sections 15 and 16 of the act of 1940 in the 1996 act but still the provisions of section 34 read together, sufficiently indicate vesting of vast powers in the court to set aside an award and even to adjourn a matter and such acts and deeds by the arbitral tribunal at the instance of the party which would help in removing the grounds of attack for setting aside the arbitral award. ..... asha talwar appears to be consistent with the scheme of the act, and in particular section 34 thereof which is a departure from the scheme of section 16 of the 1940 act which perhaps gave the court a wider amplitude of powers. ..... , fao (os) no.426/2015 decided on 15.3.2016 and it was accordingly argued on the basis of those paras 49 and 50 that the court hearing objections under section 34 of the act has power to grant additional reliefs which are not granted by the award. ..... this court is inclined to follow the decisions in central warehousing corporation, delhi development authority, state trading corporation of india ltd. ..... justice valmiki j.mehta to be referred to the reporter or not?. .....

Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Pearl Beverages Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... although the police had lodged fir under section 185 of the mv act besides sections 279/427 of the ipc, no charge-sheet has been filed against the driver till date, meaning thereby, that the police after investigating the case, could not find any evidence to prosecute ..... only evidence relied upon the insurance company to substantiate the plea that he was under the influence of intoxicating liquor at the time he died, is the report of the laboratory reporting presence of 103.14 mg of ethyl alcohol per 100 ml of the blood of the deceased.4. ..... upon which the doctors have reported/ mentioned/opined "no evidence of any fresh injury for medical examination and smell of breath alcohal ..... upon which the doctors have reported/opined "no evidence of any fresh injury for medical examination and smell of breath alcohal (+)" and mlc no.62214/07 of aman bangia s/o sh. ..... r/o h.no.08, prithvi raj road, delhi out of the said car after great efforts and reported about the incident to wireless opp. ..... as per the chemical analysis report in respect of the viscera of the stomach and intestine of the deceased, there was 120 ml of ethyl alcohol per 100 gm in the blood of the ..... the accident, a first information report came to be lodged. ..... from the appellant s vice president, the investigator of the appellant gave affidavit evidence when he vouchsafed for the correctness of his reports. ..... reportable in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal no.of2021[arising out of slp (civil) no.12489/ .....