Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: banglore development authority act 1976 chapter 4 acquisition of land Page 13 of about 8,076 results (0.549 seconds)

Bangalore Development Vs. Sri. K.n. Basavaradya

Court : Karnataka

..... necessary for consideration of the present appeals are that the acquisition proceedings by the bda for acquiring the lands under the provisions of the bangalore development authority act, 19762. consequent to a resolution dated 3.9.2007 of the bda, on 18.9.2007 it addressed a letter to the state government ..... contended that in exercise of the powers under section 36 of the bangalore development authority act the additional land acquisition officer, bangalore development authority, bangalore, has been authorised to exercise the power conferred under section 4(2) of the land acquisition act, 1894. as the additional land acquisition officer is not an officer of ..... development authority t. chowdaiah road9kumara park west bangalore-560 020. . appellants (by shri. g.s. kannur, senior advocate for shri. k. krishna, advocate) and:1. smt. achamma ammini joseph w/o late mr. k.a. joseph aged about95years no.87, 7th cross, 1st main versova layout, kaggadasapura road sir. c.v. raman nagar post banglore .....

Bangalore Development Authority Vs. Sri S Sudhakar

Court : Karnataka

..... necessary for consideration of the present appeals are that the acquisition proceedings by the bda for acquiring the lands under the provisions of the bangalore development authority act, 19762. consequent to a resolution dated 3.9.2007 of the bda, on 18.9.2007 it addressed a letter to the state government ..... contended that in exercise of the powers under section 36 of the bangalore development authority act the additional land acquisition officer, bangalore development authority, bangalore, has been authorised to exercise the power conferred under section 4(2) of the land acquisition act, 1894. as the additional land acquisition officer is not an officer of ..... development authority t. chowdaiah road9kumara park west bangalore-560 020. . appellants (by shri. g.s. kannur, senior advocate for shri. k. krishna, advocate) and:1. smt. achamma ammini joseph w/o late mr. k.a. joseph aged about95years no.87, 7th cross, 1st main versova layout, kaggadasapura road sir. c.v. raman nagar post banglore .....

Hamed Ali and Others Vs. Kabbalegowda and Others

Court : Karnataka

..... is said to have been issued in the year 1962. the land was said to have been notified for acquisition under the provisions of the bangalore development authority act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the 'bda act', for brevity). the notice under section 17 was issued on 26.5.1984 and the notice under section 19 was issued on 18.12.1986 for ..... not in dispute. the transfer by srinivasan was hence a direct violation of section 4 of the krlt act. similarly, the joint development agreement between accused no.1 and m/s prudential housing etc., is also a direct violation of the said act. it is urged that the property in question was converted from agricultural user to industrial use in the ..... , possession of the land had not been taken of the land pursuant to the final notification under section 19 of the bda act. it would follow that the land had not vested in the acquiring authority. the owner of the land would not cease to be the owner. there is no provision of law prohibiting a sale of the land. .....

S. Vasudeva Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1994SC923; (1994)2GLR949; JT1993(2)SC465; (1993)2MLJ140(SC); 1993(2)SCALE244; [1993]2SCR715

..... as it related to the remaining land mentioned therein was, however, saved by the said declaration; [v] directed the state government, the special deputy commissioner under the act, the bangalore development authority and the municipal corporation of bangalore to identify the extent of 1 acre, 2 gunthas and 58 square yards which was acquired in 1948 out of the said survey ..... sister of the son-in-law of the 4th respondent who was then the chief minister of the state of karnataka.5. on 9.1.1987, the competent authority under the act came to the conclusion that the excess vacant land out of the said survey nos. 6/1 and 6/2 after the grant of exemption by the government ..... the condition that no person is entitled to purchase in public auction more than one site, and to credit the sale proceeds in the office of the competent authority under the act who would pay the amount to the creditors of the firm. the learned judge also further directed that only such number of sites should be sold which are .....

m.somashekar Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... state of karnataka & others 2016(2) akr737 that provisions of section 24(2) of the new la act, 2013, are applicable to acquisition proceedings under the bangalore development authority act, and the karnataka urban development authority act.31. the next question that arises for consideration is, whether in the facts and circumstances of the present ..... case, award was passed five years or more prior to the coming into force of the new land acquisition act, that is to ..... court dealing with the effect of section 11a introduced by land acquisition amendment act, act 68 of 1984, that is in m. nagabhushana vs. state of karnataka and ors. air2011supreme court1113& offshore holdings private limited vs. bangalore development authority and others (2011) 3 supreme court cases139 it has not been laid .....

Sri. p.g.belliappa Vs. The Commissioner

Court : Karnataka

..... chief justice delivered the following:3. judgment this is one of the several cases we have come across where the bangalore development authority (for short bda) constituted under the bangalore development authority act, 1976 (for short, bda act) has illegally taken over possession of a private property belonging to the respondent without acquiring the same in accordance with law ..... /o sri ganapathy aged67years r/a no.19, cunningham road bangalore-560 052. cross objector (by shri murthy d.naik, advocate) and: the commissioner bangalore development authority t.chowdaiah road kumara park west bengaluru-560 020. respondent cross objections is filed under order xli rule22of c.p.c. read with rule26of chapter vi-a ..... not get compensation under the said act of 2013 on account of illegal deprivation of the property from the year 2002 onwards. the law on this aspect has been laid down by the apex court in the case of r.l.jain (dead by l.rs.) .v. delhi development authority and others4. paragraphs 17 and .....

P. Rajappa Alias B.P. Rajappa Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2004(4)KarLJ180

..... landowners, and after considering the same, the final notification under section 28(4) of the act has been issued.8. smt. shobha patil, learned additional government advocate for the 4th respondent-director of industries and commerce and smt. s. sujatha, learned counsel for 8th respondent-bangalore development authority, reiterated the argument of mr. udaya holla and submitted that these appeals are liable to ..... . union of india and ors., : air1996sc2677 their lordships while considering sections 4(1) and 3(f) of the land acquisition act observed that when an authority constituted under the act has initiated the action for acquisition of a large area of land comprising several plots for planned development, the specification of the particular land needed for a specified purpose intended to be for the .....

Sri Francis Ravi Kiran David Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1998KAR844

..... act for permission to transfer the land on which the school building and play ground are situated to the society. the said application was rejected by the government by order dated march 27, 1991 on the ground that the societies are not entitled to acquire and hold agricultural land and the land in question is notified by the bangalore development authority ..... . if a person who is legally prohibited to hold an agricultural land ispermitted by the government in exercise of its power under section 20 of the act, in my considered view it would affect the public interest instead of promoting the public interest. the violation of law is against the public interest. ..... registered sale deed dated june 25, 1983. those very persons established a society called the websters childrens home and registered the same under karnataka societies registration act. the said websters children home constructed a school building on the land in question and also a play ground. that on april 29, 1988 the society .....

Smt. Sharfunnissa Vs. the Deputy Commissioner and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2004KAR5062

..... non-alienation period has not been completed for sale of lands. the issuance of preliminary notification by the state government under the provisions of karnataka urban development authority act of 1987 for acquisition of the lands in question is not in dispute. the fact that 15 years period of non-alienation incorporated in the occupancy ..... and anr., 1986(1) klj 237 wherein the provision of section 95 of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964 (in short klr act) has been interpreted by this court and law has been laid down as under:'the authority to grant conversion cannot refuse the same if it is not covered by the prohibitions contained in section ..... date the petitioner sought conversion of the lands. there is no provision in the klrf act to relax the condition regarding non alienation of the lands either by the state government or any other authority.6. section 60 of the klrf act postulates as follows:'failure to cultivate personally -notwithstanding anything contained in any law, if at .....

Sri Sudhakar Hegde Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... the total alignment of the prr was thus 113.44 km. a preliminary notification under section 17(1) and (3) of the bangalore development authority act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the bda act , for brevity), dated 27.9.2005 was said to have been issued proposing to acquire an extent of 1962.26 acres in respect ..... the principle of incorporation .22. similarly, in western coalfields ltd. vs. special area development authority [1982 (1) scc125, section 69(d) of the madhya pradesh nagar tatha gram nivesh adhiniyam (act 23 of 1973) stated that the special area development authority under that act would, for the 145 purpose of taxation, have the powers which a municipal corporation ..... held as follows :137. 15. so far as the b.d.a. act is concerned, it is not an act for mere acquisition of land but an act to provide for the establishment of a development authority to facilitate and ensure a planned growth and development of the city of bangalore and areas adjacent thereto and acquisition of lands, .....