Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bangalore city civil court act 1979 section 17 amendment of karnataka act 11 of1964 Page 9 of about 676 results (0.165 seconds)

Sri. Ashok M .s Vs. The Anti Corruption Bureau

Court : Karnataka

..... respondents quash the impugned complaint dated2102.2023 given by the r2 annexure-a and the impugned first information report in crime no.11/2023 dated2102.2023 registered by the r1 u/s7c) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 annexure-b and all further proceedings pursuant thereto, pending on the file of the xxiii additional city civil and sessions judge (cch-24), bangalore. ..... city civil and sessions judge (cch-24) bangalore ..... or attempting to render any service or disservice to any person, with the central government or any state government or parliament or the legislature of any state or with any local authority, corporation or government company referred to in clause (c) of section 2, or with any public servant, whether named or otherwise, shall be punishable with imprisonment which shall be not less than three years but which may extend to seven years and shall also be liable to fine. ..... issue of presumption under section 20 of the pc act has been answered by the constitution bench by holding that only on proof of the facts in issue, section 20 mandates the court to raise a presumption that illegal gratification was for the purpose of motive or reward as mentioned in section 7 (as it existed prior to the amendment of 2018). ..... patil, learned counsel representing the respondent/karnataka lokayukta in all these cases would contend that it does amount to a trap and, therefore, section 17a of the act need not be complied with prior to ..... [1980 ac402 (1979) 3 wlr263 (1979) 2 all .....

Dr.s.g Savitha, Vs. The State By Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... respondents quash the impugned complaint dated2102.2023 given by the r2 annexure-a and the impugned first information report in crime no.11/2023 dated2102.2023 registered by the r1 u/s7c) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 annexure-b and all further proceedings pursuant thereto, pending on the file of the xxiii additional city civil and sessions judge (cch-24), bangalore. ..... city civil and sessions judge (cch-24) bangalore ..... or attempting to render any service or disservice to any person, with the central government or any state government or parliament or the legislature of any state or with any local authority, corporation or government company referred to in clause (c) of section 2, or with any public servant, whether named or otherwise, shall be punishable with imprisonment which shall be not less than three years but which may extend to seven years and shall also be liable to fine. ..... issue of presumption under section 20 of the pc act has been answered by the constitution bench by holding that only on proof of the facts in issue, section 20 mandates the court to raise a presumption that illegal gratification was for the purpose of motive or reward as mentioned in section 7 (as it existed prior to the amendment of 2018). ..... patil, learned counsel representing the respondent/karnataka lokayukta in all these cases would contend that it does amount to a trap and, therefore, section 17a of the act need not be complied with prior to ..... [1980 ac402 (1979) 3 wlr263 (1979) 2 all .....

Dr.k.g Sreerangappa, Vs. The State By Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... respondents quash the impugned complaint dated2102.2023 given by the r2 annexure-a and the impugned first information report in crime no.11/2023 dated2102.2023 registered by the r1 u/s7c) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 annexure-b and all further proceedings pursuant thereto, pending on the file of the xxiii additional city civil and sessions judge (cch-24), bangalore. ..... city civil and sessions judge (cch-24) bangalore ..... or attempting to render any service or disservice to any person, with the central government or any state government or parliament or the legislature of any state or with any local authority, corporation or government company referred to in clause (c) of section 2, or with any public servant, whether named or otherwise, shall be punishable with imprisonment which shall be not less than three years but which may extend to seven years and shall also be liable to fine. ..... issue of presumption under section 20 of the pc act has been answered by the constitution bench by holding that only on proof of the facts in issue, section 20 mandates the court to raise a presumption that illegal gratification was for the purpose of motive or reward as mentioned in section 7 (as it existed prior to the amendment of 2018). ..... patil, learned counsel representing the respondent/karnataka lokayukta in all these cases would contend that it does amount to a trap and, therefore, section 17a of the act need not be complied with prior to ..... [1980 ac402 (1979) 3 wlr263 (1979) 2 all .....

Sri Appu Poojari A.t., Vs. The State By Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... respondents quash the impugned complaint dated2102.2023 given by the r2 annexure-a and the impugned first information report in crime no.11/2023 dated2102.2023 registered by the r1 u/s7c) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 annexure-b and all further proceedings pursuant thereto, pending on the file of the xxiii additional city civil and sessions judge (cch-24), bangalore. ..... city civil and sessions judge (cch-24) bangalore ..... or attempting to render any service or disservice to any person, with the central government or any state government or parliament or the legislature of any state or with any local authority, corporation or government company referred to in clause (c) of section 2, or with any public servant, whether named or otherwise, shall be punishable with imprisonment which shall be not less than three years but which may extend to seven years and shall also be liable to fine. ..... issue of presumption under section 20 of the pc act has been answered by the constitution bench by holding that only on proof of the facts in issue, section 20 mandates the court to raise a presumption that illegal gratification was for the purpose of motive or reward as mentioned in section 7 (as it existed prior to the amendment of 2018). ..... patil, learned counsel representing the respondent/karnataka lokayukta in all these cases would contend that it does amount to a trap and, therefore, section 17a of the act need not be complied with prior to ..... [1980 ac402 (1979) 3 wlr263 (1979) 2 all .....

Sri. Janardhana. R Vs. The State By Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... respondents quash the impugned complaint dated2102.2023 given by the r2 annexure-a and the impugned first information report in crime no.11/2023 dated2102.2023 registered by the r1 u/s7c) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 annexure-b and all further proceedings pursuant thereto, pending on the file of the xxiii additional city civil and sessions judge (cch-24), bangalore. ..... city civil and sessions judge (cch-24) bangalore ..... or attempting to render any service or disservice to any person, with the central government or any state government or parliament or the legislature of any state or with any local authority, corporation or government company referred to in clause (c) of section 2, or with any public servant, whether named or otherwise, shall be punishable with imprisonment which shall be not less than three years but which may extend to seven years and shall also be liable to fine. ..... issue of presumption under section 20 of the pc act has been answered by the constitution bench by holding that only on proof of the facts in issue, section 20 mandates the court to raise a presumption that illegal gratification was for the purpose of motive or reward as mentioned in section 7 (as it existed prior to the amendment of 2018). ..... patil, learned counsel representing the respondent/karnataka lokayukta in all these cases would contend that it does amount to a trap and, therefore, section 17a of the act need not be complied with prior to ..... [1980 ac402 (1979) 3 wlr263 (1979) 2 all .....

Mr Jagadeesha K Vs. State Of Karnataka Through

Court : Karnataka

..... respondents quash the impugned complaint dated2102.2023 given by the r2 annexure-a and the impugned first information report in crime no.11/2023 dated2102.2023 registered by the r1 u/s7c) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 annexure-b and all further proceedings pursuant thereto, pending on the file of the xxiii additional city civil and sessions judge (cch-24), bangalore. ..... city civil and sessions judge (cch-24) bangalore ..... or attempting to render any service or disservice to any person, with the central government or any state government or parliament or the legislature of any state or with any local authority, corporation or government company referred to in clause (c) of section 2, or with any public servant, whether named or otherwise, shall be punishable with imprisonment which shall be not less than three years but which may extend to seven years and shall also be liable to fine. ..... issue of presumption under section 20 of the pc act has been answered by the constitution bench by holding that only on proof of the facts in issue, section 20 mandates the court to raise a presumption that illegal gratification was for the purpose of motive or reward as mentioned in section 7 (as it existed prior to the amendment of 2018). ..... patil, learned counsel representing the respondent/karnataka lokayukta in all these cases would contend that it does amount to a trap and, therefore, section 17a of the act need not be complied with prior to ..... [1980 ac402 (1979) 3 wlr263 (1979) 2 all .....

Webbs Sales and Services (Private) Limited, Bangalore Vs. M/S. Gurukru ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1999KAR707; 1999(1)KarLJ8

..... 8301 of 1995 in the court of the city civil judge, bangalore on 9-12-1995 for declaration that under the provisions of the burma shell (acquisitions of undertakings in india) act, 1976 is entitled to continue in possession and enjoyment of the above said property for a period of 25 years commencing from 1-10-1995 on payment of quarterly rent of ..... find that there is a public sector corporation involved in this litigation and that this corporation through its chief regional manager had filed a suit before the city civil court which, to say the least, has been very mischievously drafted as far as certain material particulars are concerned'. .... '3. ..... 3632 of 1998, against a-1 in the court of the city civil judge, bangalore and sought for injunction restraining the defendant-company or its servants from interfering with its possession of the ..... single judge, by order dated 3-3-1997 allowed the petition and quashed the said proceedings.thereafter, complainant filed an appeal purporting to be one under section 4 of the karnataka high court act, 1961 challenging the order of the learned single judge in cr. p. no. ..... appeared to us that there is some difficulty with regard to the aspect of maintainability and we have therefore, directed him to give a copy of the petition to the learned additional state public prosecutor and to carry out a formal amendment showing the state as a formal party respondent for this limited purpose as we desired to hear the state on the question of maintainability. .....

In the Matter of Canara Bank Relief and Welfare Society, and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1991Kant6; II(1990)DMC496

..... with the intending adoptive parents filed the said applications in the court of city civil judge to obtain such permission and those applications had been registered in that court as miscellaneous cases.but,the court of city civil judge,by its order under appeals,since took the view that it is only the family court of bangalore city established under the family courts act, 1986 ('the family court act') which had the jurisdiction to deal with such applications,the petitioners ..... and property,among other,(iv) that the court from which permission to give in adoption of such hindu child has to be obtained,is the city or civil court or a district court within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the child to be adopted ordinarily resides;(v) that grant of permission by the court concerned to give a hindu child in adoption must depend upon the satisfaction to be obtained by it as to the welfare of the child as provided for in sub-section (5) thereof;and (vi) that the ..... restriction placed under sub-section (4) in the matter of obtaining previous permission of the court for giving in adoption a hindu .....

Dr. G.M. Mascarenhas Vs. R. Venkatachalam

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1990KAR1396

..... we accordingly direct that the order dated 28-9-1989 passed by the x additional city civil judge, bangalore city, shall operate in conformity with the order dated 12-4-1090 passed in o.s.a. no. ..... 3800/1989 pending on the file of the x additional city civil judge, bangalore city and in which the respondent in this appeal has half share and as such he is the co-owner of the school with late miss. a.b ..... 3800/1989 by the x additional city civil judge, bangalore city, shall have to operate in conformity with the order dated 12-4-1990 passed by us in o.s.a. no ..... in the normal circumstances, it is so, because, as per the provisions contained in the karnataka high court act, and in the light of a decision in ravindranath p.v. v. ..... 3800/1989, the learned x additional city civil judge, bangalore, has passed an order of temporary injunction restraining the appellants and their agents from interfering with the respondent's (who is the plaintiff in the suit) right to peacefully manage, organise and participate in the day-to-day ..... we are of the view that if the order of temporary junction passed by the trial court which to appealed against, if allowed to operate in the terms in which it is passed, it becomes difficult for dr. g.m ..... the jurisdiction exercised by a single judge or a division bench is the jurisdiction of the high court and exercise of jurisdiction is ultimately intended to render justice to the parties. ..... 8/1990, it will not be acting without jurisdiction as the subject matter of m.f.a. no .....

Sri R. Sadagopan Vs. Sri K. Rajaiah S/O Late Sri N. Kodandarama Naidu

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2009KAR3302; 2009(6)KarLJ239

..... prithviraj, the father of the accused, filed a suit in city civil court, bangalore, for decree of declaration and injunction. ..... 25543/2007 in the city civil court, bangalore and thereafter you have filed multiple suits in o.s 25660/2007, 25716/2007, 26048/2007, 25847/2007 and 26992/2007 ..... 25660/07, 25716/07, 25487/07 & 26992/07 in the city civil court, bangalore and company petition no. ..... the accused has filed a suit for decree of permanent injunction, in the city civil court, bangalore, in o.s no. ..... 25413/2008 in the city civil court, in the form of administrative suit for administration of the estate of late k. ..... 25543/07 in the city civil court against him and others and during the pendency of the suit, he has filed o.s ..... the learned advocate general for karnataka, has granted permission under section 15(1)(b) of the act, to the complainant, to initiate criminal contempt proceedings against the accused.2 ..... striking out pleadings: the court may at any stage of the proceedings order to be struck out or amended any matter in any pleading:(a) which may be unnecessary, scandalous, frivolous or vexatious, or(b) which may tend to prejudice, embarrass or delay the fair trial of the suit, or(c) which is otherwise an abuse of the process of the court.the main object behind the said rule is to ensure that every party to a suit should present his pleading in an intelligible form without causing embarrassment to ..... vishva nath khanna : air 1979 delhi 202, does not come to the rescue of the accused .....