Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bad Court: mumbai aurangabad Page 1 of about 2,560 results (0.012 seconds)

Aug 22 2013 (HC)

Praveen S/O Prabhakarrao Jawale Vs. Maharashtra State Electricity Dist ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... ii] quash service regulation no.90 being contrary to law and un-constitutional : [a] dispensation of observance of principles of natural justice by taking recourse to sr 90 is bad because it violates guarantee of fairness in the matter of executive action. ..... 862(a'bad). .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 01 2014 (HC)

Manohar Pandit MaraThe Vs. President, Sharda Vidya Prasarak Mandal and ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... entire back wages and benefits incidental and consequential to reinstatement are then available to an employee if the subsequent order of punishment in the form of dismissal or termination is held to be bad in law since it relates back to the initial date of dismissal. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 2013 (HC)

Anandsagar Bahuddeshiya Social Krida Mandal (Sanstha) Vs. the State of ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... rule 110(b) of the said rules has to be read with section 33(7) of the bombay police act showing that, the application is made by a person of notoriously bad character for holding him as not fit or suitable for grant of licence. ..... the respondent authorities have not shown that, the petitioner is a person of notoriously bad character for holding him as not fit or suitable for grant of licence. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 16 2015 (HC)

Kumar's Liquors and Beers Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. BDA Limited and An ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... is the suit bad for non-joinder of necessary parties i.e. m/s. ..... 1,00,00,000/- is bad in law. ..... said inference is unsustainable and bad. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 06 2016 (HC)

Parmeshwar and Another Vs. The State of Maharashtra, Through Principal ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... therefore, he submits that, the suspension without ordering any fresh enquiry at the behest of minister is bad in law and could be termed as politically motivated. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 03 2010 (HC)

* FakhruddIn S/O. Hyderali Vs. Abbas S/O Abdul HusaIn and ors.

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... state of tamil nadu, 1998 (2) lac 282 (mad).this judgment was cited in respect of publication of notification under section 4 at convenient place in locality which is a mandatory provision and violation of the same would make the notification bad in law. ..... the landowner challenged the acquisition contending that the land was acquired for a society and since procedure prescribed in part vii was not followed, the acquisition was bad in law. ..... therefore, the award is bad in law. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 09 2014 (HC)

Naziruddin Khan s/o Mumtazuddin Khan Since deceased through Legal Repr ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... he contended that suit was bad for non joinder of necessary party as one abidabegum was also necessary party. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 10 2010 (HC)

Sandip Devidas Thorat, Age 31 Years, Vs. the Principal Secretary (Appe ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... accordingly, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the impugned orders dated 24.12.2009 and 23.04.2010 are bad in law and not tenable in law, since they have been passed excessively, without application of mind and therefore, same deserve to be quashed and set aside.12. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 11 2012 (HC)

Narayan S/O Tatayarao Deshmukh and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtra ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... in the facts of that case, this court held that the decision to initiate the proceedings was taken within three years time, however, same was without application of mind and hence held to be bad in law. ..... , holding that the petitioners did not hold land in excess of ceiling limit are bad in law. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 18 2014 (HC)

Dr. Kalpana Pundlik Jamdade and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra an ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... the petitioners want to show that the order suspending the registration could not sustain in law and so cognizance of the offence is bad in law and due to this contention also, it needs to be seen as to whether there is similarity in the provision made with regard to the registration of the centre and with regard to the taking cognizance of the matter by the judicial ..... in this proceeding also cognizance is challenged only on the ground, contention that the complainant had no power to file the complaint and the cognizance is bad in law. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //