Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bad Court: delhi Page 94 of about 167,948 results (0.133 seconds)

Sep 16 2003 (HC)

Airogo Travel and Cargo Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2004IAD(Delhi)440; 2004(1)CTLJ220(Del); 110(2004)DLT395; 2003(70)DRJ757

..... either way, the decision was bad. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 15 1991 (HC)

Mohd. Razak and Vs. Mahendra Prasad and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 45(1991)DLT188

..... union of india & another : 1990(47)elt188(sc) has heldthat: 'if the apprehension of the detaining authority was true, the bail application bad to be opposed and in case bail was granted, challenge against the order in the higher forum bad to be raised.merely on the ground that an accused in detention as an under trial prisoner was likely to get bail an order of detention under the national security act should not ordinarily be passed. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 01 1994 (HC)

Pawan Kumar Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 54(1994)DLT674; 1994(29)DRJ438

..... the satisfaction of the detaining authority is bad in law and shows the casual exercise of powers. ..... the long and unreasonable delay is bad in law. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 01 1996 (HC)

Rajiv Kumar Aggarwal Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1996IIIAD(Delhi)269; 63(1996)DLT183; 1996(38)DRJ95

..... hearing as contemplated by the proviso to sub-section (1) of section 7 and is not also preceded by formation of opinion contemplated by the twin clauses of sub-section (3) of section 7 of the act then the notice of acquisition published in the official gazette would be bad .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 08 1994 (HC)

Surinder Kumar Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 57(1995)DLT519

..... and the date of arrest of detenu, such delay unless satisfactorily explained, throws a considerable doubt on the reasonable subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority in passing the detention order and consequently renders the detention order bad and void. ..... in execution of the detention order inspire of the fact that the petitioner was apprehended from his house and was appearing before the court of sub-divisional judicial magistrate,makes the detention illegal and bad in law. ..... there is a long and unreasonable delay of about six months in execution ofthe detention order, makes the detention illegal and bad in law. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 01 1997 (HC)

Sudarshan Devi Vs. Mohd. Yasin

Court : Delhi

Reported in : II(1997)ACC268; 1998ACJ1212; 1997IVAD(Delhi)1021; 68(1997)DLT122; 1997(43)DRJ309; (1998)118PLR51

..... much of the calculation necessarily remains in the realm of hypothesis 'and in that region arithmetic is a good servant but a bad master' since there are so often many imponderables. ..... whether petition is bad in view of preliminary objections raised in w.s. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 14 1995 (HC)

Raj Malhotra Vs. Delhi Administration

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1996(36)DRJ22

..... ' (10) for the reasons recorded above, i hold that the impugned letters are bad in law. ..... the petitioner was bad in law. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 03 1999 (HC)

Y.K. Singla Vs. Punjab National Bank and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 79(1999)DLT585

..... bank has made admissionbefore di & cgc that thereis no irregularity committedby its officials.this relates to insuranceagainst bad-debts. ..... of claiming the moneythat has become bad. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 12 1996 (HC)

Air India Ltd. Vs. Atma Ram Properties (P) Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 62(1996)DLT305; 1996(37)DRJ504

..... and paid advance deposit and in spite of the fact that the appellant is not using the premises in question (as is revealed from inc local commissioner's report dated 28.2.96, which shows that the premises inside is in very bad shape). ..... concerns even the period after suit and hence no damages for use and occupation could be awarded from the date of plaint (september, 1994) to 30.9.95 nor for every month beyond 30.9.95, and the impugned order is bad. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 03 2003 (HC)

Bpl Communications Ltd. Vs. Punj Lloyd Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2004IAD(Delhi)8; 2004(1)ARBLR46(Delhi); [2005]125CompCas41(Delhi); 108(2003)DLT198; 2004(1)RAJ256

..... chief justice of india scheme, 1996, goes beyond section 11 by requiring, in clause 7, the service of a notice upon the other party to the arbitration agreement to show cause why the nomination of an arbitrator, as requested, should not be made, it is bad and must be amended. ..... if the schemes, as drawn go beyond the terms of section 11, they are bad and have to be amended. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //