Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: bad Court: delhi Page 87 of about 167,948 results (0.072 seconds)

Aug 05 2002 (HC)

Sanjeev R. Apte Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2003CriLJ369; 99(2002)DLT567

..... the notice envisaged under section 251 of the cr.pc would not become legally bad or infirm for non filing of the lease agreements dated 30.6.1994 and 30.3.1996, referred to in the complaint, or at the time of the service of the notice under section 251. ..... 1 company, service of notice under section 251 cr.pc will be bad in law and the petitioner will be liable to be discharged at the threshold of trial. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 11 1996 (HC)

Chander Kanta Singhal Etc. Vs. Kapadia Exports and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1996VAD(Delhi)108; 65(1997)DLT926; (1997)115PLR56

..... the mere fact that the defendant contended in the written statement that the suit is bad for want of a valid and binding notice terminating the tenancy does not tantamount to making the requisite pleas. ..... 2 and 6 of the written statement to the following effect: para 2:-'that the suit is bad because no valid notice terminating the tenancy of the defendants has been served on the defendants and is liable to be dismissed on the ground only. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 11 1995 (HC)

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Manohar Khushalani and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : II(1995)ACC573

..... the petition, thereforee, was bad for non-joinder of parties. ..... the vehicle was badly damaged and his left leg suffered fracture of shaft femur. ..... whether petition is bad for non-joinder of necessary party m/s. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 23 2003 (HC)

Daler Singh Vs. State of Nct of Delhi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2004(72)DRJ465

..... however, taking into consideration, the petitioner's background more particularly the letter dated 2.8.2002 which prima facie shows possibility of some bad blood between the petitioner and his brother shamsher singh, who is in custody, cannot be ruled out. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 25 2004 (HC)

Ramesh Chandra Khurana Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2005CriLJ434

..... alternative it is submitted by the learned additional solicitor general that even assuming that the documents referred to in the panchanama were relied upon by the detaining authority but still it will not make the detention order bad in as much as it shall be deemed to have been made separately on each of the 'grounds' as visualised in section 5a of cofeposa and, thereforee, supply of even one relied upon document, which constitutes an independent ground would be sufficient to sustain the subjective ..... order of detention shall be deemed to have been made separately on each of such grounds and accordingly, if one ground is irrelevant or an inadmissible ground has been taken into consideration, that would not make the detention order bad because of the availability of the other relevant or valid ground.14. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 2000 (HC)

R.P. Locks Company Vs. Deputy Commissoiner of Income Tax

Court : Delhi

Reported in : (2000)67TTJ(Del)588

..... according to him, it was not known as to which previous year(s) the income has been computed and thus the requirements of a provisions having not been met, the assessment was bad in law. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 16 2008 (HC)

Onkar Nath Goenka Vs. Gujarat Lease Finance Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : IV(2008)BC514

..... sidharth luthra, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, that the impugned order dated 27.4.2005 passed by the learned trial court is bad in law as it has failed to take into consideration the important facts. ..... 5427/1, arraigning the petitioner for the offence under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act, 1881 is bad in law and, therefore, hereby stands quashed.10. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 13 2004 (HC)

Dy. Cit Vs. Satya Prakash (individual) and (Huf)

Court : Delhi

Reported in : (2004)91TTJ(Del)90

..... the notification under section 17(l) is also bad in law for non-compliance of the requirement of sub-section (3a) of section 17 of the land acquisition act. ..... hon'ble delhi high court also considered the issue relating to the compliance of section 17(1)/17(3a) and has held that these are mandatory requirements and non-compliance of the same renders the acquisition itself bad in law. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 25 2008 (HC)

Mr. Y.R. Midha Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 154(2008)DLT692

..... from that day his behavior changed.on monday he called me and rebuked me badly saying that you were misbehaving on friday, i was giving you respect. ..... when i was about to leave he started abusing me with bad abuses.even then i listened to his bad abuses quietly and went out of the room. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 09 2001 (HC)

Mohd. Ashan and anr. Vs. Delhi Administration

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 91(2001)DLT169; 2001(58)DRJ265

..... the only ground taken before me by learned counsel for the petitioners is that the sanction under section 20 of the act is bad for reasons that sanction order was without application of mind.2. ..... in this view of the matter, i hold that the sanction order is bad to non-application of mind. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //