Asset Reconstruction - Judgment Search Results

JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Mahar ...

Court: Mumbai

There was no legal provision for facilitating securitisation of financial assets of banks and financial institutions, and unlike international banks, the give way to the measures taken under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002,

Asset Reconstruction Company Vs. Kumar Metallurgical Corporation

Court: DRAT Madras

Reported in: IV(2005)BC117

No. 1 and for handing over the possession of secured assets to the Authorised Officer of the appellant. On receipt of out by respondent No. 1 ARCIL under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002

Pegasus Asset Reconstruction P. Ltd. Vs. Haryana Concast Ltd.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: [2009]152CompCas215(P& H)

than one secured creditors or joint financing of a financial asset by secured creditors, no secured creditor shall be entitled to by the official liquidator. It should be noticed that the reconstruction company did not seek to stand outside the winding up

JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Board of T ...

Court: Mumbai

the restoration of possession and or management of the secured assets can be ordered by the DRT. He submitted that Section in the case of Harshad Govardhan Sondagar Vs International Assets Reconstruction Co. Ltd and Anr. (2014) 6 SCC 1)and Vishal N.

Pegasus Assets Reconstruction P.Ltd. Vs. M/S Haryana Concast Limited a ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Court and approved of certain fetters placed upon M/s. Pegasus Assets Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd., while allowing it to exercise its powers any bank or financial institution by any securitization company or reconstruction company, inter alia, by entering into an agreement and this

Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited Rep. by Its Vice Presiden ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [2006]134CompCas267(Mad); 2006(3)CTC529; (2006)2MLJ822; [2006]72SCL18(Mad)

He submitted that the appellant has failed to sell the assets despite an order by the BIFR on 24.09.2003, and it be made to the Board of Industrial and the Financial Reconstruction after the commencement of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial

Asset Reconstruction Company Vs. Paharpur Cooling Towers Ltd. and anr.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: (2008)1CompLJ306(MP); 2007(4)MPLJ560

that, in its overzealousness, the securitisation company may alienate the assets for price lower than the price it would otherwise fetch, is initiating enforcement of the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002

Asset. Reconstruction Company Vs. Paharpur Cooling Towers Ltd. and anr ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR2008MP79

as under:(9) In the case of financing of a financial asset by more than one secured creditors or joint financing of is initiating enforcement of the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002

M/s. Asset Reconstruction Company (india) Limited Vs. The Senior Sub R ...

Court: Karnataka

SENIOR SUB-REGISTRAR, PEENYA BANGALORE AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.9193 OF2017BETWEEN M/S ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY (INDIA) LIMITED (ARCIL) THE RUBY, 10TH FLOOR, NO.29, & P RESPECTIVELY AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.9578 OF2017BETWEEN M/S ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY (INDIA) LIMITED (ARCIL) THE RUBY, 10TH FLOOR, NO.29, SENAPATI

Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd. Vs. Excel Dealcomm Pvt. Ltd. ...

Court: Kolkata

secured creditor possessed the industrial unit and thereafter transferred the assets to Webtech. EXCEL would contend, ARCIL entered into an agreement that it would intend to work in the field of reconstruction of industrial units. Unless appropriate licence is obtained from the