Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: army act 1950 section 72 alternative punishments awardable by court martial Court: karnataka Page 5 of about 249 results (0.380 seconds)

Jul 30 2003 (HC)

Barakur Laxman Setty Vs. the Divisional Traffic Officer, N.W.K.R.T.C. ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2004KAR1317

..... with further cost of rs. 2,000/- etc.3. petitioner appealed to the appellate authority ie., the district judge, bagalkot under section 10 of the karnataka public premises (eviction of un-authorized occupants) act 1974. by order dated 19th september, 2001 the learned district judge having allowed the appeal in part and having setting aside the operation ..... remained in the premises beyond the licence period. though the learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently urged that the petitioner was pursuing his remedies under the act and in fact the appellate order came to be passed only on 19th september, 2001 and the petitioner having vacated the premises much earlier even as on ..... the levy of interest @ 20% per annum is not sustainable inasmuch as the competent officer is not enabled to levy any interest under the provisions of the act or rules framed thereunder. learned counsel also submits that if at all any interest can be levied it should be an equitable rate which is at 6% per .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 16 2024 (HC)

Exalogic Solutions Private Limited Vs. The Director, Serious Fraud Inv ...

Court : Karnataka

..... the petitioner.16. around the same time, a communication is sent by the registrar on 29-01-2021 calling for information under section 206 of the act. proceedings under section 206 of the act, therefore, was sought to be initiated against the petitioner. it did not spring from air, but it was due to the ..... with regard to transactions between cmrl and the petitioner.17. on 01-10-2021, the competent authority again communicates seeking information under sub-section (4) of section 206 of the act directing submission of complete trial balance 19 showing opening balance, debit and credit for the last five years. the communication reads as follows: ..... had been shifted. this results in another notice dated 19-08-2020 issued by the registrar directing the petitioner to file adjudication application under section 454 of the act for the alleged non-maintenance of the office. the petitioner then submits an adjudication application before the registrar who initiates adjudication proceedings against the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 12 1997 (HC)

K.R. Rajalakshmi Devi (Deceased) by L.Rs Vs. K.R. Chandrasekhar

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1998(3)KarLJ634

..... of failure of plaintiff to remove suspicious circumstance by placing satisfactory evidence on record. the supreme court in the said decision held as follows: '(b) succession act (1925), section 61 -- will --genuineness -- proof -- failure of plaintiff to remove suspicious circumstances by placing satisfactory material on record -- will could be said to be ..... '.(d) in shashikumar banerjee's case, supra, on the point of mode of proof and onus, the supreme court indicated the principles as hereunder: '(a) succession act (1925), sections 63 and 289 -- will -- mode of proof -- onus -- principles indicated -- when court would grant probate -- : air1958cal264 , reversed. the mode of proving ..... the court would grant probate, even if the will might be unnatural and might cut off wholly or in part near relations. (c) evidence act (1872), section 3 -- appreciation of evidence -- evidence of attesting witnesses to a will --slight discrepancy as to time of execution. where the evidence of both the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 17 1995 (HC)

Shankar Vs. Karnataka Land Army Corporation Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1996KAR1407

..... be said to be carrying on an industry nor could the provisions of the industrial employment (standing orders) act, 1946, be said to be applicable to it. reliance was placed upon the provisions of section 13-a in support of the argument that any question as to the application or interpretation of a standing ..... , karnataka milk federation, karnataka state financial corporation etc., had increased the age of retirement from 55 years to 58 years. inasmuch as the respondent land army corporation had not similarly enhanced the age of superannuation, contended the petitioners it had committed an illegality and brought about a hostile discrimination as between the employees ..... the age of 58 years.2. learned counsel appearing for petitioners argued that even though the respondent-corporation has framed what are known as 'karnataka land army corporation service rules', yet the said rules are inoperative as the same have not been approved by the government. they relied upon a resolution passed by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 21 2012 (HC)

The Union of India Represented by the Secretary and Others Vs. Major V ...

Court : Karnataka

..... they question the vires of statutory legislations (except where the legislation which creates the particular tribunal is challenged) by overlooking the jurisdiction of the tribunal concerned. section 5(6) of the act is valid and constitutional and is to be interpreted in the manner we have indicated. (underlining supplied) 13. the appeal is accompanied by an application ..... to the extent they exclude the jurisdiction of the high courts and the supreme court under articles 226/227 and 32 of the constitution, are unconstitutional. section 28 of the act and the exclusion of jurisdiction clauses in all other legislations enacted under the aegis of articles 323-a and 323-b would, to the same ..... (prayer: these writ appeals are filed under section-4 of the karnataka high court act praying to set aside the order passed in writ petition no.9762-63/2012 dated 18/06/2012) vikramajit sen, c.j. 1. petitioner no.1, a serving major in the indian army, states that he had fallen in love with petitioner .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 2017 (HC)

Lt Col D S Choudhary Vs. Union of India

Court : Karnataka

..... with regard to the maintainability of the writ petitions. according to the learned senior counsel, the regulations were framed under section 192 of the army act. 25 the regulations clearly proclaim that they are "non-statutory" in nature. regulation 5 of the regulations defines the constituent parts of the ..... s indo-afghan agencies ltd. (supra)].. 31 17. admittedly, the regulations were framed under section 192 of the army act. thus, the regulations are a subordinate piece of legislation. regulation 5 of the regulations mentions different constituents of the army headquarters. the said provision also mentions the quartermaster general. he heads the quartermaster general branch ..... army headquarters; one such constituent part is the quartermaster general. his branch, called the quartermaster general's branch, deals with quartering .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 2017 (HC)

Lt Col D. S. Choudhary and Others Vs. Union of India, Through the Secr ...

Court : Karnataka

..... with regard to the maintainability of the writ petitions. according to the learned senior counsel, the regulations were framed under section 192 of the army act. the regulations clearly proclaim that they are "non-statutory" in nature. regulation 5 of the regulations defines the constituent parts of the ..... m/s indo-afghan agencies ltd. (supra)]. 17. admittedly, the regulations were framed under section 192 of the army act. thus, the regulations are a subordinate piece of legislation. regulation 5 of the regulations mentions different constituents of the army headquarters. the said provision also mentions the quartermaster general. he heads the quartermaster general branch ..... army headquarters; one such constituent part is the quartermaster general. his branch, called the quartermaster general's branch, deals with quartering of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 16 2020 (HC)

Sri Devaraj Vs. Smt Dayarathini

Court : Karnataka

..... court should not venture to compare writings itself, as it would thereby assume to itself the role of an expert is entirely without force. section 73 of the evidence act expressly enables the court to compare disputed writings with admitted or proved writings to ascertain whether writing is that of the person by whom it ..... .d4 to ex.d7, constitute state of things under which the plaintiff entered the picture between the salvation army and the defendants, besides affording an opportunity for explaining the actual transaction. section 7 of the indian evidence act is applicable in this context. 4037. dw4 and dw5 are the persons wrongly identified by the plaintiff. probably ..... two documents produced by the defendants in proof of their applying for permission under section 26 of the urban land (ceiling & regulation) act. they are the affidavits 58 filed by k.shubhacharita, the third defendant and captain g.lazarus, representing the salvation army . ex.d15 and ex.d16 are a notice dated 19.08.1980 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 17 1995 (HC)

Shankar Vs. Karnataka Land Army Corporation Ltd. and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1996(1)KarLJ329; (1997)IIILLJ291Kant

..... be said to be carrying on an industry nor could the provisions of the industrial employment (standing orders) act, 1946, be said to be applicable to it. reliance was placed upon the provisions of section 13a in support of the argument that any question as to the application or interpretation of a standing order ..... , karnataka milk federation, karnataka state financial corporation etc., had increased the age of retirement from 55 years to 58 years. inasmuch as the respondent land army corporation had not similarly enhanced the age of superannuation, contended the petitioners, it had committed an illegality and brought about a hostile discrimination as between the employees ..... age of 58 years.2. learned counsel appearing for petitioners argued that even though the respondent - corporation has framed what are known as 'karnataka land army corporationservice rules', yet the said rules are inoperative as the same have not been approved by the government. they rely upon a resolution passed by the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 11 2020 (HC)

Shri.g.b. Devaraj Vs. State Of Kanataka

Court : Karnataka

..... be placed before the board, as the board of the corporation is the competent authority to take a decision on the report submitted by the lokayukta under section 12(3) of the act. on all these courts, the learned counsel would seek quashing of the impugned proceedings. 66. on the other hand, sri.pavan kumar, learned counsel ..... as the judgments relied upon by the learned counsel appearing for the third respondent is concerned, the judgment reported in ilr1996kar1407in the case of shankar vs. karnataka land army corporation ltd., this court has held as follows: 8. it was next argued by the learned counsel for petitioners that the resolution passed by the board of ..... the karnataka civil service regulations (for short k.c.s.r. ) and made them applicable to employees of the corporation. this court in shankar v. karnataka land army corporation limited [ilr1996kar 1407.]. has held that adopting k.c.s.r. is to supplement the existing rules so as to cover all situations as were not specifically .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //